Creation of a terminological platform for strategic management of the intellectual maturity of industrial ecosystems for the purposes of technological sovereignty

Aim. The work aimed to construct a scientifically sound and practically applicable terminological platform for strategic management of the intellectual maturity of industrial ecosystems as a key condition for achieving technological sovereignty and industrial leadership of Russia in the context of Industry 6.0.
Objectives. The work seeks to conceptualize the notions of “intellectual maturity”, “intellectual resilience”, “cognitive flexibility”, ‘hyperconnectivity’, and “digital emotional intelligence” in relation to digital and industrial ecosystems; to perform critical analysis of existing theoretical and practical approaches to maturity assessment; to develop grounds for constructing a unified research vocabulary that ensures the cognitive integrity of management decisions.
Methods. The study employed the systemic and cognitive approaches using methods of conceptual analysis, comparative terminological examination, elemental structuring of concepts, and principles of logical and semantic modeling. The provisions of the Strategy for Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation and modern theories of industrial ecosystem management in the era of Industry 6.0 are taken into account.
Results. The author’s interpretation of the key categories that determine the intellectual maturity of ecosystems is substantiated. The relationship between cognitive cooperation, knowledge management architecture and strategic development of industrial structures is established. The work identifies the levels of intellectual maturity and proposes the indicators for its assessment. The authors reveal the role of intellectual maturity as a factor of cognitive autonomy and a generator of technological sovereignty.
Conclusions. The developed conceptual framework is a basis for the formalization and standardization of approaches to the intellectualization of industrial ecosystems, provides a conceptual platform for the subsequent institutionalization of strategic management in the logic of cognitive-centric models. The results open up new opportunities for research in the field of intellectual transformation of industry and the formation of cognitive sovereignty.

1. Sukhobskaya G.S. The concept of “maturity of human socio-psychological development” in the context of andragogy. Novye znaniya. 2002;(4):17-21. (In Russ.).

2. Luchinina A.O. Stimulating the development of giftedness in adolescents. Eksperiment i innovatsii v shkole. 2009;(6):94-100. (In Russ.).

3. Chebotareva E.M. Historiographic analysis of the phenomenon of intellectual maturity in the philosophical, psychological and pedagogical literature. Vestnik Polotskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya E. Pedagogicheskie nauki. 2018;(7):35-42. (In Russ.).

4. Ivankina L.I. Intellectual maturity of a personality as a factor of social subjectness realization. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya = Theory and Practice of Social Development. 2014;(4):14-17. (In Russ.).

5. Hafkamp M. P., Slaets J. P., van Bodegom D. Intellectual maturity and longevity: Late-blooming composers and writers live longer than child prodigies // Aging. 2017. Vol. 9. No. 5. P. 1433–1439. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.101245

6. Khalilzadeh M., Bahari A., Kiaee M. The influence of philosophical mentality and spiritual intelligence on creativity of employees mediated by organizational commitment // Creativity Studies. 2023. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 650–667. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2023.16462

7. Candiotto L., Politis V. Epistemic wonder and the beginning of the enquiry: Plato’s Theaetetus (155d2-4) and its wider significance // Candiotto L., Politis V., eds. Emotions in Plato. Leiden: Brill, 2020. P. 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004432277_003

8. Bruner J. S. Nature and uses of immaturity // American Psychologist. 1972. Vol. 27. No. 8. P. 687–708. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033144

9. Wechsler D. Intellectual development and psychological maturity // Child Development. 1950. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 45–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1126418

10. Bjorklund D. F. The role of immaturity in human development // Psychological Bulletin. 1997. Vol. 122. No. 2. P. 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.122.2.153

11. Shkarupeta E.V., Babkin A.V. Transformation of economic model: Comparative analysis of intellectual, intelligent and smart economy in the context of digitalization. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management. 2023;29(12):1481-1490. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2023-12-1481-1490

12. Vertakova Yu.V., Shkarupeta E.V. Intelligent manufacturing in the context of Industry X.0. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii = Economic Revival of Russia. 2025;(1):146-162. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2025-1-83-146-162

13. Lin C., Hu Z.-Z., Yang C. et al. Maturity assessment of intelligent construction management // Buildings. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 10. Article No. 1742. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101742

14. Susanto A. H., Simatupang T., Wasesa M. Industry 4.0 maturity models to support smart manufacturing transformation: A systematic literature review // Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi). 2023. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 334–344. https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v7i2.4588

15. Patel S., Kelsey S., Patel D. A framework for intelligent maturity model // OOIS’2001, 7th International conference on object oriented information systems (27–29 August 2001, Calgary, Canada) / eds. X. Wang, R. Johnston, S. Patel. London: Springer, 2001. P. 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0719-4_25

16. Sonntag M., Mehmann S., Mehmann J., Teuteberg F. Development and evaluation of a maturity model for AI deployment capability of manufacturing companies // Information Systems Management. 2024. Vol. 42. No. 1. P. 37–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2024.2319041

17. Babkin A.V., Liberman I.V., Klachek P.M., Shkarupeta E.V. Industry 6.0: Methodology, tools, practice. π-Economy. 2025;18(1):21-56. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18721/JE.18102

18. Babkin A.V., Shkarupeta E.V. Industry 6.0: The essence, trends and strategic opportunities for Russia. Ekonomika promyshlennosti = Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2024;17(4):353-377. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2024-4-1369

19. Choori A., Kazemi S. Strategic management in the digital age: A review of decision-making frameworks // International Journal of Innovation Management and Organizational Behavior. 2023. Vol. 3. No. 2. P. 21–32. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.ijimob.3.2.4

20. Index of intellectual maturity of economic sectors, social sphere sectors and public administration system of the Russian Federation: Analytical report. Moscow: National Center for Artificial Intelligence Development under the Government of the Russian Federation; 2023. 75 p. (In Russ.).

21. Index of readiness of priority sectors of the Russian economy for the implementation of artificial intelligence: Analytical report. Moscow: National Center for Artificial Intelligence Development under the Government of the Russian Federation; 2024. 85 p. (In Russ.).