Development and testing of a diagnostic model of innovative organizational culture
https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2022-11-1181-1194
Abstract
Aim. This study presents the results of the development of a diagnostic model of organizational culture, which makes it possible to assess innovativeness as a formal characteristic that can be calculated using empirical methods.
Tasks. The author systemizes methods for diagnosing and studying organizational culture; based on the resulting classification, proposes a diagnostic model of innovative organizational culture as a method for conducting socio-psychological research of organizational changes and assessing the organization’s innovativeness.
Methods. The study uses general scientific methods of logical, structural, comparative, and systems analysis, qualitative methods of survey, observation, questionnaire, documentation analysis.
Results. A review of methods for analyzing and diagnosing organizational culture in terms of innovativeness shows that in modern practice of organizational research there are many methods characterized by mosaic structure and absence of an empirically based model.
Conclusion. The proposed model is a reliable tool for assessing the readiness of organizational culture for changes at the individual, group, and organizational level that have passed a psychometric test and are applicable for assessing socio-psychological phenomena in the context of organizational changes.
About the Authors
T. A. Subtselnaya
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
postgraduate student at the Department of Political Economy
V. A. Negrii
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
postgraduate student at the Department of Educational Technologies
References
1. Burke W.W. Organization development: A process of learning and changing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1994. 214 p.
2. Makarov V.V., Slutsky M.G., Blatova T.A., Godun A.D. Innovative development strategy of the company. Ekonomika i biznes: teoriya i praktika = Economy and Business: Theory and Practice. 2020;(8):90-94. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2411-0450-2020-10654
3. Evseeva S.A. Diagnostics of the innovative orientation of the organizational culture of the company. Tendentsii razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya. 2020;(62-10):30-34. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18411/lj-06-2020-209
4. Lipatov S.A. Methods of socio-psychological diagnostics of the organization. In: Zhukov Yu.M., Petrovskaya L.A., Solov’eva O.A., eds. Introduction to practical social psychology: A collection. Moscow: Smysl; 1999:248-264. (In Russ.).
5. Shein E.H. Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.; 1985. 358 p.
6. Cameron K.S., Quinn R.E. Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2011. 256 p.
7. Handy C. Understanding organizations. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books; 1993. 445 p.
8. Blake R.R., Mouton J.S. The managerial grid. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1960. 350 p.
9. Deal T.E., Kennedy A.A. Corporate culture: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1982. 232 p.
10. Melnikova O.T., Khoroshilov D.A. Methodological principles of qualitative research in psychology. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya = The Moscow University Herald. Series 14: Psychology. 2013;(3):4-17. (In Russ.).
11. Erastova A.V. Methods for diagnosing organizational culture. Aktual’nye problemy gumaitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. 2013;(11-1):212-214. (In Russ.).
12. Argyris C. Integrating the individual and the organization. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1964. 330 p.
13. Herzberg F., Mausner B., Snyderman B. The motivation to work. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1959. 157 p.
14. Mcgregor D. The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.; 1960. 246 p.
15. Vlasov A.B., Pakhomova Yu.V., Kudryavtseva N.N., Duvanova Yu.N. Innovative strategy of management of development of the enterprise. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta inzhenernykh tekhnologii = Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2016;(4):370-375. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20914/2310-1202-2016-4-370-375
16. Korotkovskaya E.V. Strategies of leading companies innovative development. Matematicheskoe i komp’yuternoe modelirovanie v ekonomike, strakhovanii i upravlenii riskami = Mathemati cal and Computer Modelling in Economics, Insurance and Risk Management. 2018;(3):203-207. (In Russ.).
17. Choi M., Ruona W.E.A. Individual readiness for organizational change and its implications for human resource and organization development. Human Resource Development Review. 2011;10(1):46-73. DOI: 10.1177/1534484310384957
18. Bogers M., Lhuillery S. A functional perspective on learning and innovation: Investigating the organization of absorptive capacity. Industry and Innovation. 2011;18(6):581-610. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2011.591972
19. Lewis C.C., Fischer S., Weiner B.J., Stanick C., Kim M., Martinez R.G. Outcomes for implementation science: An enhanced systematic review of instruments using evidence-based rating criteria. Implementation Science. 2015;10:155. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0342-x
Review
For citations:
Subtselnaya T.A., Negrii V.A. Development and testing of a diagnostic model of innovative organizational culture. Economics and Management. 2022;28(11):1181-1194. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2022-11-1181-1194
Views:
278
