Balancing the Spheres of Life During Professional Economic Education
https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2020-8-886-900
Abstract
Aim. The presented study aims to determine the key employment parameters that allow bachelor’s and master’s degree students to combine work with professional education in the optimal way and help people enrolled on further professional education to maintain a balance between work and family functions.
Tasks. The authors analyze surveys of bachelor’s and master’s degree undergraduates and graduates of continuing professional education (CPE) programs of the Faculty of Economics of Lomonosov Moscow State University (MSU).
Methods. This study uses general logical methods: dialectical, logical, comparative, and systems analysis; methods of sociological research, including public surveys.
Results. The authors identify major employment characteristics that help working students maintain high academic performance and positively affect the work-family balance of older people receiving further professional education.
Conclusions. Increased flexibility of the labor market in the form of more part-time job offers could make a significant contribution to maintaining and improving the quality of training of students who combine work and studies, which is especially relevant for bachelor’s degree students. Diversifying the available forms of employment can positively affect the decision to gain intitial professional experience while studying at the university. Due to the development of remote employment, the forms of occupation available to students need to be further studied in detail.
About the Authors
O. A. ZolotinaRussian Federation
Ol'ga A. Zolotina - Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor of the Department of Labor and Personnel Economics.
1-46 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
M. A. Serpukhova
Russian Federation
Mariya A. Serpukhova - Assistant of the Department of Labor and Personnel Economics.
1-46 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
References
1. Razumova T.O., Burak I.D. Additional vocational education as a tool for implementing the concept of lifelong learning. Nauchnye issledovaniya ekonomicheskogo fakul’teta. Elektronnyi zhurnal = Scientific Researches of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal. 2019;11(1):30-48. (In Russ.).
2. Roshchin S.Yu. Transition “study – work”: Whirlpool or ford? Preprint WP3/2006/10. Moscow: NRU HSE; 2006. 52 p. (In Russ.).
3. Mikhailova N.K., Yarkova T.A. Combining students’ studies with work – the way to a profession? Ekonomika truda = Russian Journal of Labor Economics. 2019;6(2):763-774. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18334/et.6.2.40671
4. Razumova T.O., Zolotina O.A. Features of employment of university graduates in the Russian labor market. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6: Ekonomika = Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2019;(2):138-157. (In Russ.).
5. Roshchin S.Yu., Rudakov V.N. The influence of the “quality” of the university on the wages of graduates. Preprint WP15 / 2015/03. Moscow: NRU HSE; 2015. 30 p. (In Russ.).
6. Bazzhina V.A., Lobatyuk V.V. Balancing the needs of higher education and the labor market during innovative development of Russia. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management. 2014;(12):67-73. (In Russ.).
7. Delors J., Al Mufti I., Amagi A., Carneiro R., Chung F., Geremek B., Gorham W., Kornhauser A., Manley M., Padrón Quero M., Savane M., Singh K., Stavenhagen R., Myong W., Zhou N. Learning: The treasure within. Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. Paris: UNESCO; 1996. 48 p.
8. Blood R.O., Wolfe D.M. Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. New York: Free Press; 1960. 293 p.
9. Lambert S.J. Processes linking work and family: A critical review and research agenda. Human Relations. 1990;43(3):239-257. DOI: 10.1177/001872679004300303
10. Piotrkowski C.S. Work and the family system: A naturalistic study of working-class and lowermiddle- class families. New York: The Free Press; 1979. 337 p.
11. Greenhaus J.H., Beutell N.J. Sources of conflict between work and family roles. The Academy of Management Review. 1985;10(1):76-88. DOI: 10.2307/258214
12. Barnett R., Baruch G. Women’s involvement in multiple roles and psychological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1985;49(1):135-145. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.135
13. Marks S., MacDermid S. Multiple roles and the self: A theory of role balance. Journal of Marriage and Family. 1996;58(2):417-432. DOI: 10.2307/353506
14. Clark S. Work/family border theory: А new theory of work/family balance, Human Relations. 2000;53(6):747-770. DOI: 10.1177/0018726700536001
15. Belsky J., Perry-Jenkins M., Crouter A. The work-family interface and marital change across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Family Issues. 1985;6(2):205-220. DOI: 10.1177/.019251385006002004
16. Kelly R., Voydanoff P. Work/family role strain among employed parents. Family Relations. 1985;34(3):367-374. DOI: 10.2307/583575
17. Frone M.R. Work-family balance. In: Quick J.C., Tetrick L.E., eds. Handbook of occupational health psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2003:143-162. DOI: 10.1037/10474-007
18. Cegarra-Leiva D., Sánchez-Vidal M., Cegarra-Navarro J. Understanding the link between work life balance practices and organisational outcomes in SMEs: The mediating effect of a supportive culture. Personnel Review. 2012;41(3):359-379. DOI: 10.1108/00483481211212986
19. Thornthwaite L. Working time and work-family balance: A review of employees’ preferences. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. 2004;42(2):166-184. DOI: 10.1177/1038411104045360
20. Greenhaus J.H., Powell G.N. When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. The Academy of Management Review. 2006;31(1):72-92. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2006.19379625
21. Razumova T.O., Serpukhova M.A. Achieving family-work balance in the Russian Federation: Theoretical foundations and current trends. Nauchnye trudy: Institut narodnokhozyaistvennogo prognozirovaniya RAN = Scientific Articles: Institute of Economic Forecasting. Russian Academy of Sciences. 2019;17:401-414. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29003/m827.sp_ief_ras2019/401-414
22. Razumova T.O., Serpukhova M.A. Balance “family-work” in the management system of social and labor relations: Theory and practice. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya = Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Management. 2020;(5):15-25. (In Russ.).
23. Kalabikhina I.E. Measuring by time: A new paradigm of social and demographic policy. Narodonaselenie = Population. 2020;23(2):37-50. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/population. 2020.23.2.4
Review
For citations:
Zolotina O.A., Serpukhova M.A. Balancing the Spheres of Life During Professional Economic Education. Economics and Management. 2020;26(8):886-900. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2020-8-886-900