Digital Technologies in the System of Modern Models of Interaction between Taxpayers and Tax Authorities
https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2020-8-840-850
Abstract
The presented study addresses the peculiarities of using digital technologies in the field of interaction between taxpayers and tax authorities.
Aim. The study aims to explore the possibilities of introducing advanced digital technologies (Automated Control System (ACS) VAT-2, product labelling, and introduction of online cash registers) into the system of modern models of interaction between taxpayers and tax authorities.
Tasks. The authors analyze the specific aspects of implementing ACS VAT-2, product labeling, and online cash registers in business practice and develop recommendations for improving the efficiency of these tools.
Methods. This study uses general scientific methods: legal and statistical analysis, synthesis, induction, and deduction.
Results. The operating features of ACS VAT-2 are considered, the scheme used by tax authorities to identify organizations benefiting from VAT deduction is shown, and sanctions applied to these entities are described. The study analyzes the operating principle of online cash registers, the major stages of their implementation, and the sanctions applied to entrepreneurs using outdated cash register equipment. In the context of consideration of the mandatory product labeling system, the algorithms for preparing entrepreneurs to the transition towards electronic labeling are examined and the transition periods for specific product groups are estimated.
Conclusions. The implementation of ACS VAT-2 digital technologies, online cash registers, and electronic product labeling increases the efficiency of control over product movement along the entire logistics chain and is aimed at preventing tax evasion, particularly with regard to VAT.
About the Author
T. V. Deeva
Market Economy Institute Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tat’yana V. Deeva - Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Doctoral Student.
Nakhimovskiy Ave 47, Moscow, Russia, 117418
References
1. FTS remotely. How electronic audit systems are evolving. Prakticheskoe nalogovoe planirovanie. 2020;(5). URL: https://e.nalogplan.ru/810471 (accessed on 02.08.2020). (In Russ.).
2. Report on the accrual and receipt of taxes, fees, insurance premiums and other mandatory payments to the budgetary system of the Russian Federation. Official website of the Federal Tax Service of Russia. URL: https://www.nalog.ru/rn66/related_activities/statistics_and_analytics/forms/ (accessed on 02.08.2020). (In Russ.).
3. Kobyakova E.A. Use of automated information technologies during tax audits ASK VAT, ASK VAT-2. In: Finance architecture: Anti-crisis financial strategies in the context of global change. Proc. 7th Int. sci.-pract. conf. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Economics; 2016:10-14. (In Russ.).
4. Timoshenko V.A. Improving control over the calculation and payment of VAT on the basis of “ASK VAT-2”. Pravo i ekonomika. 2017;(11):61-65. (In Russ.).
5. Tsykura M.G. Results of the implementation of the program “ASK VAT-2” and its impact on the effective management of public finances. Innovatsionnoe razvitie ekonomiki = Innovative Development of Economy. 2017;(5):113-116. (In Russ.).
6. Zadera O.A. Influence of ASK VAT-2 on the statistics of tax audits of the Federal Tax Service of Russia in the Volgograd region. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. 2017;(9):575-576. (In Russ.).
7. Shalina D.N., Grinkevich A.M. ASK VAT-2: A large-scale “tracking complex” for business. Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola = Siberian Financial School. 2017;(6):55-57. (In Russ.).
8. Sedaev P.V., Chaadaeva O.V. Introduction of the RMS ASK VAT-2: Consequences for taxpayers and the tax authority. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship. 2018;(6):1035-1037. (In Russ.).
9. Lopukhova E.A. PK ASK VAT, the consequences of its implementation for taxpayers. In: Science. Education. Culture: Actual problems and solution practice (federal and regional aspects). Proc. 10th All-Russ. sci.-pract. conf. Prokopyevsk: Branch of the Kuzbass State Technical University named after T.F. Gorbachev; 2017:113-116. (In Russ.).
10. Agranat A.R., Shevchenko A.V., Solnyshkova Yu.N. ASK VAT: A mechanism for controlling value added tax. Vestnik sovremennykh issledovanii. 2018;(11.4):92-94. (In Russ.).
11. Bubakina A.S., Shmeleva A.I. Accounting in the digital economy: the use of online cash registers (online CCP). In: Step into the future: Artificial intelligence and the digital economy. Smart nations: The economy of digital equality. Proc. 3rd Int. sci. forum. Moscow: State University of Management; 2020:160-167. (In Russ.).
12. Matveeva V.S. Features of the use of cash registers in the modern economy with the introduction of online cash registers. In: Sustainable development problems: Sectoral and regional aspects. Proc. Int. sci.-pract. conf. Tyumen: Tyumen Industrial University; 2019:79-82. (In Russ.).
13. Larina Yu.O., Nikolaeva E.S. Digitalization as an effective means of combating product counterfeiting: The role of online cash registers. In: ScienceJuice2019. Proc. student open conf. Moscow: Paradigma; 2020:386-388. (In Russ.).
14. Sachevskaya E.A. Digital control of entrepreneurship: The role of online cash registers. In: ScienceJuice2019. Proc. student open conf. Moscow: Paradigma; 2020:399-401. (In Russ.).
15. Mansurova G.I., Mansurov P.M., Tulupova I.M. Pros and cons of online cash registers in small businesses. Vestnik Ul’yanovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Ulyanovsk State Technical University. 2019;(4):68-71. (In Russ.).
16. Evsyukova O.V., Buryak M.S. Advantages and disadvantages for online checkout business. In: Scientific community of students: Interdisciplinary research. Proc. 18th student int. sci.-pract. conf. Novosibirsk: Sibirskaya akademicheskaya kniga; 2017:271-276. (In Russ.).
17. Buslova E.V., Matveeva V.S. Modern view on the use of online cash registers in Russia and abroad. In: Accounting, analysis and audit: Current state and development prospects. Ekaterinburg: Ural State University of Economics; 2019:24-27. (In Russ.).
18. Samodelkin S.I. Product labeling as an effective tool for the product traceability strategy: First experience, current state and prospects. In: Topical issues of modern science and education. Proc. 18th Int. sci.-pract. conf. Kirov: Moscow University of Finance and Law; 2019:878-891. (In Russ.).
19. Pushilo A.P. Labeling of goods and cash register equipment. In: Law and modern economics: New challenges and prospects. Proc. 2nd sci.-pract. conf. with int. particip. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Economics; 2019:338-340. (In Russ.).
20. Korablev S.V. Product labeling and the fate of small businesses. In: Information as an engine of scientific progress. Proc. All-Russ. sci.-pract. conf. Sterlitamak: International Research Agency; 2019:190-193. (In Russ.).
21. Yaryshkin K.I. Product labeling as a path to total financial control. In: Actual problems of modern financial science. Moscow: KnoRus; 2019:142-144. (In Russ.).
22. Tsvetkov V.A., Dudin M.N., Lyasnikov N.V., Zoidov K.Kh. Tax control system in the Russian Federation and ways to improve its efficiency. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management. 2019;(1):4-15. (In Russ.).
23. Results of activities of the Federal Tax Service of Russia for 2019. Official website of the Federal Tax Service of Russia. URL: https://www.nalog.ru/rn77/related_activities/statistics_and_analytics/effectiveness/ (accessed on 06.08.2020). (In Russ.).
24. Tikhonova A.V. On the role of information and communication technologies in tax legal relations: Russian and foreign experience. Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie = Taxes and Taxation. 2019;(7):51-63. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.7256/2454-065X.2019.7.30591
25. On the use of cash registers when making settlements in the Russian Federation. Federal Law of May 22, 2003 No. 54-FZ. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_42359/ (accessed on 06.08.2020). (In Russ.).
26. On amendments to part two of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation. Federal Law of November 27, 2017 No. 349-FZ. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_283506/ (accessed on 06.08.2020). (In Russ.).
27. On approval of additional details of fiscal documents and formats of fiscal documents that are mandatory for use. Order of the Federal Tax Service of Russia dated March 21, 2017 No. ММВ-7-20 / 229 @ (as amended on August 29, 2019). URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_214339/ (accessed on 06.08.2020). (In Russ.).
28. 1C: Management of a small company. New in version 1.6.8. URL: https://its.1c.ru/db/content/updinfo/src/smallbusiness/1.6.8/index.htm (accessed on 06.08.2020). (In Russ.).
29. On amendments to article 4.7 of the Federal Law “On the use of cash registers for settlements in the Russian Federation” and articles 5 and 8 of the Federal Law “On the fundamentals of state regulation of trading activities in the Russian Federation”. Federal Law No. 487-FZ of December 31, 2017 (as amended on July 3, 2018). URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_286746/ (accessed on 06.08.2020). (In Russ.).
30. DataMatrix Code: The modern way of labeling. URL: https://www.business.ru/article/2896-koddatamatrix (accessed on 06.08.2020). (In Russ.).
31. Methodological recommendations for participants in the experiment on marking with identification means and monitoring the turnover of footwear corresponding to the EAEU nomenclature of goods subject to foreign trade codes 6401-6405 in the Russian Federation. Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_306157/ (accessed on 06.08.2020). (In Russ.).
32. On the basics of state regulation of trading activities in the Russian Federation. Federal Law of December 28, 2009 No. 381-FZ (as amended on December 25, 2018). URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_95629/ (accessed on 06.08.2020). (In Russ.).
33. Mandatory labeling of goods Honest mark. Official website of the state system of labeling and tracking Honest mark. URL: https://честныйзнак.рф/ (accessed on 06.08.2020). (In Russ.).
34. On approval of the list of individual goods subject to mandatory labeling by means of identification (with amendments and additions). Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of April 28, 2018 No. 792-r. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_297114/(accessed on 06.08.2020). (In Russ.).
35. Code of the Russian Federation on administrative offenses. Federal Law No. 195-FZ of December 30, 2001 (as amended on July 31, 2020). URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_34661/ (accessed on 06.08.2020). (In Russ.).
36. The Criminal code of the Russian Federation of June 13, 1996 No. 63-FZ (as amended on June 8, 2020) (with amendments and additions that came into force on July 27, 2020). URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_10699/ (accessed on 06.08.2020). (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Deeva T.V. Digital Technologies in the System of Modern Models of Interaction between Taxpayers and Tax Authorities. Economics and Management. 2020;26(8):840-850. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2020-8-840-850
Views:
709
