Russia's Strategic Priorities in the Global Monetary System from the Point of View of Ensuring Foreign Economic Security
https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2020-3-297-305
Abstract
The presented study analyzes the reasons for the need to move away from the US dollar (hereinafter referred to as the dollar) as a universal means of payment in international trade based on the existing threats, examines alternative means of international payments, and identifies their benefits and drawbacks in the context of Russia’s economic security.
Aim. The study aims to identify and characterize the means of international payments that fall in line with Russia’s strategic priorities from the perspective of economic security.
Tasks. The author considers the risks of using the dollar in international payments and reserves, assesses various means of international payments from the perspective of Russia’s strategic interests, and evaluates the possibility of substituting the dollar with alternative means of international payments.
Methods. This study analyzes information from the International Economic Forums, statistics of the Central Bank of Russia, Federal State Statistics Service, Decree of the President of the Russian Federation on the economic security strategy of the Russian Federation until 2030, reports of news agencies, and works of Russian and foreign authors on the subject.
Results. Based on the results of the conducted study, the author draws several conclusions. Due to many factors, the most important of them being the volume of trade in dollars, the dollar will remain the world’s leading currency in international trade. However, given that de-dollarization is a global process, the existing trends will amplify. A supranational currency is unlikely to appear for a number of reasons. First, the obvious opposition of the United States due to its unwillingness to let go of such a powerful lever of economic well-being and political influence as the use of the dollar as a global means of payment. The US would probably agree to creating a supranational currency in the medium term if the global process of de-dollarization reaches critical values. Second, the financial and trade centers of the euro and renminbi area are likely to focus on developing their own currencies, especially given the growing global GDP and China’s trade. Creating a supranational currency based on the existing structure of the International monetary Fund (hereinafter — the IMF), following the example of Special Drawing Rights (SDR), with the IMF virtually controlled by the United States, will not eliminate the threat of the currency being used as an instrument of political pressure on individual countries. Replacing the dollar with such kind of supranational currency does not serve the interests of Russia’s economic security. A potential alternative involves creating a supranational currency based on a structure that is independent of the IMF. In this case, the obstacles would include the obvious opposition of the US and its allies and the potential influence of the US on the emission of the supranational currency using its foreign political resources to affect the decisions made by other countries. Using national currencies in international trade in the medium term under the influence of globalization would lead to a formation of multiple currency centers. These centers would most likely be the dollar, euro, renminbi, and ruble.
Conclusions. The creation of a ruble-based International Monetary Center with the CIS, BRIC countries (except China), and Turkey serves Russia’s strategic interests. Further consolidation around the ruble would require implementing a financial sustainability policy, maintaining the stability of the macroeconomic environment, creating an international bank similar to the IMF with payments made in rubles, strengthening offshore ruble areas, and increasing high-tech exports.
About the Authors
E. B. MalykhRussian Federation
Elena B. Malykh – Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Economic Theory and Business Economics
Lermontovskiy Ave 44/A, St. Petersburg, 190103
V. I. Pakhomov
Russian Federation
Vyacheslav I. Pakhomov – Candidate of Economic Sciences, Professor, Professor at the Department of Material Security
Makarova Emb. 8, St. Petersburg, 199034
References
1. Vladimir Putin spoke at the plenary meeting of the second “Russian Energy Week”, the international forum on energy efficiency and energy development. Oct. 3, 2018.: Official website of the President of Russia. URL: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/58701 (accessed on 16.02.2020). (In Russ.).
2. Fadeikina N. V., Savradym V. M. The impact of external economic sanctions on Russia and the de-dollarization policy on the state of national economies. Nepreryvnoe professional’noe obrazovanie i novaya ekonomika = Continuing Professional Education and New Economy. 2018;(1):185-216. (In Russ.).
3. Khorsun D. V. The impact of sanctions on the economic security of Russia. Nauchnye trudy KubGTU = Scientific Works of the Kuban State Technological University. 2018;(6):996-1002. URL: https://ntk.kubstu.ru/data/mc/0054/2256.pdf (accessed on 16.02.2020). (In Russ.).
4. Platonova I. N. The vector of de-dollarization in trade and economic relations between Russia and China. In: Russia and China: History and prospects of cooperation. Proc. 9 th Int. sci.-pract. conf. Blagoveshchensk: Blagoveshchensk State Pedagogical Univ.; 2019:125-132. (In Russ.).
5. Shvandar K. V., Anisimova A. A., Yakovleva I. I. Prospects of monetary integration of the EAEU countries. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya = Financial Analytics: Science and Experience. 2018;11(2):205-222. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24891/fa.11.2.205
6. Strokan’ S. et al. Congressional dissonance: US lawmakers have prepared “devastating measures” against Moscow. Kommersant. 2018;(137). URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3702816 (accessed on 16.02.2020). (In Russ.).
7. Official website of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. URL: https://cbr.ru/ (accessed on 16.02.2020). (In Russ.).
8. On the Economic Security Strategy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 13, 2017 No. 208. URL: http://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/41921 (accessed on 16.02.2020). (In Russ.).
9. Losev A. BRICS Pay — a unified payment system in the BRICS countries. Valdai: International Discussion Club. Mar. 05, 2019. URL: https://ru.valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/brics-pay/ (accessed on 16.02.2020). (In Russ.).
10. Ageeva O., Tkachev I. Russia and Turkey agreed to get away from the dollar in mutual settlements. RBC. Oct. 08, 2019. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/economics/08/10/2019/5d9c7b539a7947b0de346b49 (accessed on 16.02.2020). (In Russ.).
11. Official website of the Federal State Statistics Service. URL: https://www.gks.ru/ (accessed on 16.02.2020). (In Russ.).
12. The volume of settlements in national currencies inside the BRICS will grow, Ryabkov said. RIA Novosti. Jan. 20, 2020. URL: https://ria.ru/20200120/1563636997.html (accessed on 16.02.2020). (In Russ.).
13. Putin proposed to use the ruble for settlements between the BRICS countries. Izvestiya. Nov. 14, 2019. URL: https://iz.ru/943334/2019-11-14/putin-predlozhil-ispolzovat-rubl-dlia-raschetovmezhdu-stranami-briks (accessed on 16.02.2020). (In Russ.).
14. Petrov A. The ruble will lead the national currencies in trade of the CIS countries. Russian Institute for Strategic Studies. Oct. 01, 2018. URL: https://riss.ru/smi/54041/ (accessed on 16.02.2020). (In Russ.).
15. China hit the dollar by launching oil futures trading in yuans. SMART-LAB. Mar. 26, 2018. URL: https://smart-lab.ru/blog/news/460631.php (accessed on 16.02.2020). (In Russ.).
16. Fadeeva A. Russia invited China to participate in determining Urals oil prices. RBC. Aug. 28, 2017. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/business/28/08/2017/599ec4979a7947274da7e253 (accessed on 16.02.2020). (In Russ.).
17. Tkachev I., Pudovkin E. European de-dollarization: How the EU wants to get away from the hegemony of the dollar. RBC. Dec. 05, 2018. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/economics/05/12/2018/5c07f6249a7947199114084f (accessed on 16.02.2020). (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Malykh E.B., Pakhomov V.I. Russia's Strategic Priorities in the Global Monetary System from the Point of View of Ensuring Foreign Economic Security. Economics and Management. 2020;26(3):297-305. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2020-3-297-305