Scientific and Innovative Aspects of Regional Economic Development

Innovation-driven development of the Russian economy requires a consistent national policy aimed at boosting scientific and innovative activity in the regions, which would facilitate the development of entrepreneurship and technology. It also plays an important role in ensuring the socio-economic progress of the regions and efficiency of income distribution.

Aim. The presented study aims to examine the potential directions for optimizing scientific and innovative activity in regional socio-economic development and to identify factors that facilitate the intensification of innovative activity in the regions.

Tasks. The authors conduct a correlation analysis between scientific and economic development of the regions with allowance for such factors as the level of education of the population and the number of researchers engaged in research and development (R&D). They also assess the current state of scientific and innovative activity and the national policy on the formation of the scientific and innovative potential of the regions.

Methods. The methodological basis of the study of the scientific and innovative aspects of regional economic development includes correlation-regression analysis and abstract logical methods.

Results. This study substantiates the role of scientific and innovative activity in regional economic development; determines a positive correlation between regional economic growth and the number of researchers; establishes an inverse correlation between scientific and economic development based on the dependence of innovative activity in the regions on the accumulated scientific potential; empirically assesses the impact of innovative factors on regional economic growth and proposes directions for improving the efficiency of the regional system of science and innovation.

Conclusions. Concentrations of knowledge are analyzed as agglomerations of expenses on research and development, science and technology. This leads to an increase in the number of scientists, engineers, scientific and technological personnel of innovative enterprises in various Russian regions. A correlation analysis between scientific and economic regional development shows that per-capita GRP growth rate by the number of researchers is statistically significant, which means there are several factors affecting this dependence: geographical accessibility of higher education, university expenses on infrastructure and services, job creation, additional revenue from students from other countries and regions. It is established that efficient regional higher education systems and innovative development have a positive effect on regional economic development. The conducted analysis shows that a policy on the innovative development of resource regions should be based on government support that would facilitate the creation of innovations and strengthening of scientific potential.

1. On approval of the state program of the Tula region “Industrial Development in the Tula Region”. Decree of the Government of the Tula Region dated July 23, 2015 No. 343 (as amended on March 29, 2019). URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/430504358 (accessed on 09.09.2019). (In Russ.).

2. Agasisti T. Performance and sending efficiency in higher education: A European comparison through non-parametric approaches. Education Economics. 2011;19(2):199-224. DOI: 10.1080/09645290903094174

3. Agasisti T., Johnes G. Heterogeneity and the evaluation of efficiency: The case of Italian universities. Applied Economics. 2010;42(11):1365-1375. DOI: 10.1080/00036840701721463

4. Hanushek E.A. Will more higher education improve economic growth? Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2016;32(4):538-552. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grw025

5. Piras G. sphet: Spatial models with heteroskedastic innovations in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2010;35(1):1-21. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v035.i01

6. Barro R.J., Sala-i-Martin X. Convergence. The Journal of Political Economy. 1992;100(2):223- 251. DOI: 10.1086/261816

7. Goldstein H.A., Maier G., Luger M.I. The university as an instrument for economic and business development: US and European comparisons. In: Dill D.D., Sporn B., eds. Emerging patterns of social demand and university reform: Through a glass darkly. Oxford, Tarrytown, NY: Pergamon Press; 1995:105-133.

8. Hanushek E.A., Woessmann L. Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes and causation. Journal of Economic Growth. 2012;17(4):267-321. DOI: 10.1007/s10887-012-9081-x

9. Belenzon S., Schankerman M. Spreading the word: Geography, policy and knowledge spillovers. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 2013;95(3):884-903. DOI: 10.1162/REST_a_00334

10. Demidova O., Ivanov D. Models of economic growth with heterogenous spatial effects: The case of Russian regions. Ekonomicheskii zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki = The HSE Economic Journal. 2016;20(1):52-75. (In Russ.).

11. Verspagen B. Uneven growth between interdependent economies: A evolutionary view on technology gaps, trade and growth. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd; 1993. 296 p.

12. Sahal D. Patterns of technological innovation. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing; 1981. 381 p.

13. Smith K. Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: Rethinking the role of policy. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies. 2000;1(1):73-102. DOI: 10.1080/146324400363536

14. Magomedgadzhiev Sh.M. Assessing the impact of information and communication technologies on the indicators of innovation in the regions of Russia using the methods of correlation and regression analysis. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya = Fundamental Research. 2014;(5-4);820-824. (In Russ.).

15. Ruchin V.A., Smolina E.S. The effectiveness of science and education in the context of the global educational space: A regional aspect. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo universiteta = Vestnik of Saratov State Socio-Economic University. 2016;(1):62-69. (In Russ.).

16. Kapoor M., Kelejian H., Prucha I. Panel data model with spatially correlated error components. Journal of Econometrics. 2007;140(1):97-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.09.004

17. On approval of the Strategy for socio-economic development of the Belgorod region for the period until 2025. Decree of the Government of the Belgorod Region of January 25, 2010 No. 27-pp (as amended on March 25, 2019). URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/428596289 (accessed on 09.09.2019). (In Russ.).

18. On approval of the Strategy for socio-economic development of the Yaroslavl region for the period until 2025. Decree of the Government of the Yaroslavl Region dated March 6, 2014 No. 188- pp (as amended on October 23, 2019). URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/412703993 (accessed on 09.09.2019). (In Russ.).

19. On the concept of innovative development of the Kaluga region. Decree of the Government of the Kaluga Region of November 21, 2007 No. 302. URL: https://base.garant.ru/15910286/. (accessed on 09.09.2019). (In Russ.).

20. On the state programme for development of the Tver Region “Economic development and innovative economy of the Tver Region” for the period 2018-2023. Decree of the Government of the Tver region dated December 29, 2017 No. 467-pp (as amended on October 25, 2019). URL: http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?doc_itself=&backlink=1&nd=117246513&page=1&rdk=7 (accessed on 09.09.2019). (In Russ.).

21. On approval of the state program of the Tambov region “Economic development and innovative economy” for 2014-2020. Decree of the Administration of the Tambov Region dated September 24, 2013 No. 1057 (as amended on November 20, 2019). URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/467400667 (accessed on 29.11.2019). (In Russ.).

22. On approval of the Strategy for socio-economic development of the Vladimir region until 2030. Decree of the Governor of the Vladimir Region of June 2, 2009 No. 10 (as amended on September 21, 2018). URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/965014297 (accessed on 09.09.2019). (In Russ.).

23. On approval of the Strategy for socio-economic development of the Smolensk region until 2030. Decree of the Administration of the Smolensk region of December 29, 2018 No. 981. URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/553122332 (accessed on 09.09.2019). (In Russ.).

24. On approval of the state program of the Kursk region “Development of the economy and external relations of the Kursk region”. Resolution of the Administration of the Kursk Region dated October 24, 2013 No. 774-pas (as amended on September 5, 2019). URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/463602736 (accessed on 09.09.2019). (In Russ.).

25. On the Strategy of socio-economic development of the Voronezh region for the period until 2035. Law of the Voronezh Region dated December 20, 2018 No. 168-OZ. URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/550300779 (accessed on 13.09.2019). (In Russ.).

26. Regions of Russia. Socio-economic indicators: Stat. coll. 2017. URL: http://old.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/catalog/doc_1138623506156 (accessed on 13.09.2019). (In Russ.).

27. The share of high-tech and knowledge-intensive sectors of the economy in GRP. Federal State Statistics Service. URL: https://www.gks.ru/folder/11186?print=1 (accessed on 13.09.2019). (In Russ.)