Industrial Сapacity Efficiency Function

The presented study examines the functional relationships between enterprise efficiency and the criteria of estimated utility indicators in the technological cycle of economic industrial growth of quality and value.

Aim. The study aims to propose a mechanism of contractual management of the resource potential of an industrial enterprise and its efficiency according to the given quality parameters of the product.

Tasks. The authors determine the efficiency indicators of resource potential utilization; specify the parameters of the structural relationships within the technological process and the given functionality of production relations; determine the value of the potential of structural links and normative (rent) interest rates on the resources used.

Methods. This study uses general scientific methods of cognition to examine the technological methods of assessing the resource potential of a structural unit in various aspects and to determine the principles of formation of qualitative and quantitative indicators of production output.

Results. The authors propose a methodological approach to assessing the efficiency of industrial structural units under market conditions in terms of utility and value, with many managerial decisions being disintegrated. The result is a snowball of uncertainties that destroys motivational interest in the efficient economic growth of value and utility.

Conclusions. The target functional relationships between the interests of industrial enterprises make it possible to improve the efficiency of value and labor principles in the management of the technological process and to substitute the resulting estimated value indicator for an indicator of added value and utility in a cycle of consumer production. The focus is on balancing interests according to the potential resource capacity of all technological participants of integrated production. This approach allows for an efficient, balanced impact on the technological, organizational, and economic potential of industrial growth.

economic growth, resources, efficiency evaluation, utility growth, integrated structure, quality, capacity utilization efficiency

1. Shcherbakov V .N. Investment potential and industrial growth. Moscow: Dashkov & Co.; 2018. 435 p. (In Russ.).

2. Shukhov N. S. Value in the system of economic categories. Moscow: Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the USSR Academy of Sciences; 1982. 64 p. (In Russ.).

3. Lenchuk E. B., Filatov V. I. The Russian economy: Searching for effective strategy. Mir novoi ekonomiki = The World of New Economy. 2018;12(1):6-21. DOI: 10.26794/2220-6469-2018-12-16-21

4. Shcherbakov V. N., Khalidov R. A. Regulation of economic transformations in industry. Innovatsionnaya ekonomika: informatsiya, analitika, prognozy. 2014;(4-5):7-9. (In Russ.).

5. Airapetyan A. S., Grablev A. N., Makarova I. V. The effective formation of industrial cluster on the basis of the developed technique for the assessment and selection of its members. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship. 2016;(11-2):1009-1013. (In Russ.).

6. Shcherbakov V. N. Macroeconomic Aspects of commercialization of innovations. Moscow: Dashkov & Co.; 2019. 496 p. (In Russ.).

7. Shcherbakov V. N. Criteria for managing institutional transformations. Transportnoe delo Rossii = Transport Business of Russia. 2019;(1):75-77. (In Russ.).

8. Malinetskii G. G. Applied mathematics at the turn of the 21st century. In: Mathematical analysis and mathematical modeling. Proc. 8th reg. school-conf. of young scientists “Vladikavkaz Youth Mathematical School”. Vladikavkaz: Southern Mathematical Institute of the RAS Vladikavkaz Scientific Center; 2012:67-92. (In Russ.).

9. Shcherbakov V. N. The economic potential of the enterprise as an object of management. Biznes v zakone = Business in Law. 2013;(5):162-165. (In Russ.).

10. Shcherbakova N. S. Fundamentals of production and material flow management. Moscow: RUDN University; 2019. 105 p. (In Russ.).