Preview

Economics and Management

Advanced search

Pension Reform in Russia: Assessing the Susceptibility of GDP Production to a Shift in the Number of the Working-Age Population

https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2019-9-80-86

Abstract

The presented study considers the susceptibility of gross domestic product (GDP) production to a shift in the number of the working-age population due to an increase in retirement age starting with 2019.
Aim. The study aims to examine the quantitative assessments of GDP production in Russia with allowance for the changes in the number of the working-age population due to an increase in the actual retirement age.
Tasks. The authors forecast the number of the working-age population with allowance for an increase in the retirement age; develop a model to establish a correlation between the number of the workingage population, investment in fixed capital, and GDP production; quantify the impact of the shift in the number of the working-age population on GDP production in Russia.
Methods. This study is based on the results of modeling and long-term forecasting.
Results. An economic-mathematical model to establish a correlation between the number of the working-age population, investment in fixed capital, and GDP production is presented. To specify the economic effects of a shift in the number of the working-age population due to an increase in the retirement age, Russia’s GDP production is forecasted for the “old” and “new” (increased retirement age) pension scheme. The forecast is provided for three variants of the number of the working-age population.
Conclusions. It is found that with the “old” pension scheme with a lower retirement age GDP production across all three variants will decrease by 2036 compared to 2017. With regard to the “new” scheme that increases the retirement age, it is concluded that an increase in the retirement age is a factor that facilitates GDP production. However, its effect on economic growth will be insignificant.

About the Authors

T. P. Skufina
Federal Research Centre Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences (KSC RAS)
Russian Federation

Tatiana P. Skufina

Fersmana St. 24A, Apatity, Murmansk Oblast, Russian Federation, 184209,



S. V. Baranov
Federal Research Centre Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences (KSC RAS)
Russian Federation

Sergey V. Baranov

Fersmana St. 24A, Apatity, Murmansk Oblast, Russian Federation, 184209



References

1. Sinyavskaya O. V. Russian pension system in the context of demographic challenges and constraints. Ekonomicheskii zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki = The HSE Economic Journal. 2017;21(4):562–591. (In Russ.).

2. Baranov S. V., Skufina T. P. Influence of increasing retirement age on the gross domestic product in Russia. Innovatsii = Innovations. 2018;(9):38–44. (In Russ.).

3. Kalemli-Ozcan S., Ryder H. E., Weil D. N. Mortality decline, human capital investment, and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics. 2000;62(1):1–23. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00073-0.

4. Baranov S. V., Skufina T. P. Opportunities to promote economic growth in Russia at a rate not lower than the world average. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2018;11(5):49-60. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2018.5.59.3.

5. Chakraborty S. Endogenous lifetime and economic growth. Journal of Economic Theory. 2004; 116(1):119–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2003.07.005.

6. Bongaarts J. Pensions at a glance 2015: OECD and G20 indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2015. 376 p. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2016.00147.x.

7. Mao H., Ostaszewski K. M., Wen Z. The retirement decision with consideration of part-time work after retirement. Journal of Insurance Issues. 2019;42(1):86-112.

8. Van Riet A., ed. Euro area fiscal policies and the crisis. ECB Occasional Paper Series. 2010;(109). URL: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecbocp109.pdf

9. Mao H., Ostaszewski K. M., Wang Y. Optimal retirement age, leisure and consumption. Economic Modelling. 2014;43:458–464. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.09.002.

10. Amaglobeli D., Chai H., Dabla-Norris E., Dybczak, K., Soto M., Tieman A. The future of saving: The role of pension system design in an aging world. IMF Staff Discussion Note. 2019;(1). DOI: 10.5089/9781484388990.006.

11. Chai H., Kim J.I. Demographics, pension systems and the saving-investment balance. IMF Working Paper. 2018;(265). URL: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2018/12/07/Demographics-Pension-Systems-and-the-Saving-Investment-Balance-46384.

12. Attanasio O., Bonfatti A., Kitao S., Weber G. Global demographic trends: Consumption, saving and international capital flows. In: Piggott J., Woodland A., eds. Handbook of the economics of population aging. Vol. 1. Amsterdam, Oxford: North-Holland; 2016:179–235.

13. Staveley-O’Carroll J., Staveley-O’Carroll O.M. Impact of pension system structure on international financial capital allocation. European Economic Review. 2017;95:1–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.03.008.

14. Li H., Zhang J., Zhang J. Effects of longevity and dependency rates on saving and growth: Evidence from a panel of cross countries. Journal of Development Economics. 2007;84(1):138-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.10.002.

15. Mitchell O. S. Retirement systems in developed and developing countries: Institutional features, economic effects and lessons for economies in transition. NBER Working Paper. 1993;(4424). URL: https://www.nber.org/papers/w4424.pdf.

16. Skufina T., Baranov S., Samarina V., Shatalova T. Production functions in identifying the specifics of producing gross regional product of Russian Federation. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2015;6(5 S3):265–270. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s3p265.

17. Skufina T., Baranov S., Samarina V., Korchak E. Increasing GDP production in the Russian Federation and raising the retirement age: Is there a connection? AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research. 2019;9(1):69–72.

18. Skufina T. P., Baranov S. V. Mathematical and statistical modeling of the GRP production dynamics in the regions of the North and the Arctic: In search of a better model. Voprosy statistiki. 2017;(7):52-64. (In Russ.).

19. Minakir P. A. Spatial interdisciplinary synthesis: Experience of policy studies. Regional Research of Russia. 2015;5(4):299–309. DOI: 10.1134/S2079970515040115.

20. Ushakov D., Elokhova I., Kharchenko I. Tax instruments in public regulation of population employment: The factors of today’s efficiency. International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics. 2017;38(2):161–168.

21. Cobb C. W., Douglas P. H. A theory of production. The American Economic Review. 1928;18(1):139-165.

22. Felipe J., Adams F. G. “A theory of production” the estimation of the Cobb-Douglas function: A retrospective view. Eastern Economic Journal. 2005;31(3):427-445.

23. Solow R.M. Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1957;39(3):312–320. DOI: 10.2307/1926047.


Review

For citations:


Skufina T.P., Baranov S.V. Pension Reform in Russia: Assessing the Susceptibility of GDP Production to a Shift in the Number of the Working-Age Population. Economics and Management. 2019;(9):80-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2019-9-80-86

Views: 355


ISSN 1998-1627 (Print)