Adapting TOGAF ADM to the Development and Implementation of Architectural Solutions in FMCG Chain Retailing

The presented study adapts the TOGAF Architecture Development Method (ADM) to the development and implementation of architectural solutions in FMCG chain retailing.

Aim. The study aims to adapt TOGAF ADM to the development and implementation of architectural solutions in FMCG chain retailing.

Tasks. The authors formulate a definition of FMCG chain retailing architecture, determine the detail levels of architectural solutions, develop a basic architecture model, and examine the transition from the basic towards the target architecture. Building an efficient architectural solution for FMCG chain retailing enterprises using ADM requires creating a functional model and identifying groups of architectural areas for consistent architecture construction.

Methods. The architecture of FMCG chain retailing is an efficient planning tool that combines the IT architecture of chain retailing with business architecture and makes it possible to achieve the strategic objectives of chain retailing. By developing an architectural solution, it becomes possible to determine business structure, systematize information for efficient business operations, build a map of the company’s business processes, and identify appropriate technologies to support these processes. The preliminary phase of building an architecture begins with the development of the business concept of a chain retailing company based on a business model. Starting with the preliminary phase, the working group launches an architecture project, goes through all the phases from the first stage to the last, and then launches the next project.

Results. ADM TOGAF does not necessarily involve planning methods, which is why the result largely depends on the opinion of the working group. During TOGAF ADM activity, particular attention should be paid to the analysis of factors that affect the implementation and planned changes. Architecture blocks and architecture roadmap are two important elements of the development process. After analyzing the differences between the basic and the target architecture models (gap analysis), it is necessary to identify transient, excludable, and input architecture blocks, set and harmonize similar requirements for similar business processes, specify risks, and develop a strategy for the implementation of the target architecture. When making decisions, special attention should be paid to the priority of the chosen architectural solutions, formation of transit architectures (if necessary), and development of a plan for the implementation of the architectural roadmap in FMCG chain retailing.

Conclusions. In the context of reengineering business processes of chain retailing companies, the most solid basis for building architectural solutions using ADM would be the company’s functional model. The proposed ADM adaptation on the basis of the functional model significantly increases the effi-ciency of development and management of architecture development for FMCG chain retailing companies.

1. Program “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation”. Approved by order of the Government of the Russian Federation of July 28, 2017 No. 1632-r. Available at: http://static.government.ru/ media/files/9gFM4FHj4PsB79I5v7yLVuPgu4bvR7M0.pdf. Accessed 27.04.2019. (in Russ.).

2. Review and forecast for the Russian retail market in 2018-2019. Promdevelop.ru. 10 Oct., 2018. Available at: https://promdevelop.ru/obzor-rynka-roznichnoj-torgovli-v-2018-2019-v-rossii/. Accessed 25.05.2019. (in Russ.).

3. Korotkov A. Enterprise architecture: How to make IT work for your company? Available at: http:// andrey-korotkov.ru/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/andrey-korotkov.ru_Enterprise_architecture.pdf. Accessed 27.03.2019. (in Russ.).

4. Lankhorst M. Enterprise architecture at work: Modelling, communication and analysis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2009. 338 p.

5. The Open Group Architecture Framework. TOGAF® Version 9. The Open Group. Available at: https://www.up.ac.za/media/shared/Legacy/sitefiles/file/44/1066/2018/8136/tempfolder/togaf9. pdf. Accessed 27.03.2019.

6. Gorelik V. I., Makarov S. M. Metodologiya biznes-analiza pri postroenii arkhitektury predpriyatiya [Business analysis methodology for building enterprise architecture]. Teoriya. Praktika. Innovatsii, 2018, no. 2 (26), pp. 39–44.

7. Efremova L. I., Kurganov A. N. Arkhitektura predpriyatiya kak instrument povysheniya effektivnosti deyatel’nosti ekonomicheskogo ob”ekta [Enterprise architecture as a tool to improve the efficiency of the economic object]. Ogarev-Online, 2017, no. 2 (91), p. 3.

8. Il’in I. V., Zapivakhin I. M. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya roznichnoy torgovli (riteyla): arkhitekturnyy podkhod [Digital transformation of retail: An architectural approach]. Prikladnaya informatika, 2018, vol. 13, no. 5 (77), pp. 5–11.

9. Voronova O. V., Il’in I. V. Agregirovannaya model’ motivatsionnogo rasshireniya dlya postroeniya arkhitekturnykh resheniy setevogo riteyla FMCG-segmenta [An aggregate motivation extension model for building architectural solutions for chain retailing in the FMCG segment]. Ekonomika i upravlenie, 2019, no. 2 (160), pp. 78–85.

10. Kozin E. G., Il’in I. V., Levina A. I. Reinzhiniring IT-arkhitektury predpriyatiya na baze servisorientirovannogo analiza arkhitektury predpriyatiya [IT-architecture reengineering using serviceoriented analysis of the enterprise architecture]. Perspektivy nauki, 2016, no. 9 (84), pp. 48–56.

11. Smirnov A. B., Il’ina O. V. Protsess sistematizatsii informatsii dlya analiza biznes-protsessov v sfere torgovli [The process of systematization of information for the analysis of business processes in the field of trade]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo, 2017, no. 2-2 (79), pp. 523–527.