Statistics on the Allocation of Infrastructural Facilities in Russia (Territorial and Economic Aspects)

The presented study examines statistics on the construction of infrastructural objects in the Russian Federation.

Aim. The study aims to analyze the allocation of federal and regional infrastructural facilities with allowance for socio-economic positions.

Tasks. The authors examine the commissioning of different types of infrastructural facilities in the Russian Federation, identify regional peculiarities of their allocation, and assess the socio-economic implications of large-scale construction of similar facilities in Sochi in preparation for the 2014 Winter Olympics.

Methods. This study uses systems analysis methods and data of the Federal State Statistics Service to conduct a retrospective study of the current situation in Russia, structural dynamic analysis of the allocation of infrastructural facilities across the country’s regions, and an assessment of socioeconomic indicators.

Results. The current trends in the allocation of the major types of infrastructural facilities in modern Russia are determined. Regions with the most favorable conditions for the development of such facilities are identified. A methodology for planning corresponding projects with allowance for their mutual influence and funding restrictions is developed. Changes in the quality of life of Sochi residents due to the construction of facilities in preparation for the 2014 Winter Olympics are assessed.

Conclusions. Construction of federal and regional infrastructural facilities affects the socio-economic development of the corresponding regions and serves to improve the quality of life of the local population. In Russia, there is a positive dynamics in terms of the allocation of such facilities. However, these effects are perceived controversially, and the trends towards improving the quality of life (through the example of Sochi) do not align with the results of large-scale construction in the region. When planning federal and regional development programs for the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, it is advisable to conduct an in-depth multi-factor forecasting of social and economic implications of the implementation of such programs.

1. Vlasov S. V., Snakin V. V., Dem’yanov A. E., Stepanov E. G., Melkumyan S. E., Ermakov K. V., Predushchenko A. V. Lineynye ob”ekty PAO “Gazprom”: puti snizheniya ekologicheskogo riska [Line facilities of PJSC “Gazprom”: Ways to reduce environmental risk]. Nauchnyy zhurnal Rossiyskogo gazovogo obshchestva, 2016, no. 1, pp. 10−17.

2. Vypkhanova G. V. Predostavlenie i ispol’zovanie zemel’nykh uchastkov, zanyatykh lineynymi ob”ektami energetiki v usloviyakh izmeneniya zakonodatel’stva [Provision and use of land occupied by linear energy facilities in the context of legislative changes]. Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika, 2017, no. 1 (145), pp. 121−126.

3. Krasnova T. S. Servitut dlya razmeshcheniya i ekspluatatsii lineynogo ob”ekta [An easement for the deployment and operation of the linear object]. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2018, no. 7, pp. 10−19.

4. Krasnova T. S. Ustanovlenie servitutov dlya stroitel’stva i ekspluatatsii lineynykh ob”ektov (v tom chisle v tselyakh realizatsii krupnykh infrastrukturnykh proektov) [Establishment of easements for the construction and operation of linear facilities (for the implementation of large infrastructure projects)]. Pravo i sovremennaya ekonomika. Mat. I Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. yuridicheskogo fakul’teta SPbGEU (5 aprelya 2018 g.) [Law and the modern economy. Proc. 1st Int. sci.-pract. conf. of St. Petersburg State University of Economics, Faculty of Law (April 5, 2018)]. St. Petersburg: SPb. SUE, 2018, pp. 106−114.

5. Mel’nikov N. N. Elementy podrazumevaemogo servituta v otnosheniyakh, svyazannykh s razmeshcheniem lineynykh ob”ektov: obzor doktrinal’nykh polozheniy, zakonodatel’stva i sudebnoy praktiki [Elements of implied easement in relationships associated with the placement of linear objects: A review of doctrinal provisions, legislation and judicial practice]. Khozyaystvo i pravo, 2019, no. 6 (509), pp. 49−61.

6. Verzilin D. N., Mochalov V. F., Maksimova T. G. Ekonomiko-matematicheskoe modelirovanie nagruzki na osobo okhranyaemye prirodnye territorii po dannym distantsionnogo zondirovaniya zemli [Economic and mathematical modeling of the load on specially protected natural areas according to land remote sensing data]. Obshchestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo, 2018, no. 12, pp. 59−65.

7. Verzilin D. N., Maksimova T. G., Antokhin Yu. N. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie i ekologicheskie pokazateli sostoyaniya ekologo-ekonomicheskikh ob”ektov: genezis i razvitie [Socio-economic and environmental indicators of the state of ecological and economic objects: Genesis and development]. Obshchestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo, 2017, no. 12, pp. 56−60. DOI: 10.24158/ pep.2017.12.12.

8. Verzilin D., Maximova T., Sokolova I. Online socioeconomic activity In Russia: Patterns of dynamics and regional diversity. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2017, vol. 745, pp. 55−69. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-69784-0_5.

9. Golovko M. V., Plotnikov V. A. Neekonomicheskie faktory ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti [Non-economic factors of economic security]. Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’, 2019, vol. 15, no. 1 (370), pp. 35−52. DOI: 10.24891/ni.15.1.35.

10. Plotnikov V. A., Nikitin Yu. A., Volkova A. A. Investitsionnyy potentsial kak faktor strukturnykh preobrazovaniy regional’nogo khozyaystvennogo kompleksa [Investment potential as a factor of structural changes in the regional economic complex]. Ekonomika i upravlenie, 2019, no. 2 (160), pp. 38−46.

11. Gorbacheva N. V. Otsenka ekonomicheskogo neravenstva v gosudarstvenno-chastnykh partnerstvakh v promyshlennosti [Evaluation of economic inequality in manufacturing public-private partnerships]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ekonomika, 2018, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 317−342. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu05.2018.206.

12. Vertakova Yu. V., Polozhentseva Yu. S. Otsenka strukturno-dinamicheskoy transformatsii ekonomiki regionov [Evaluation of structural-dynamic transformation of the regional economy]. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Sotsiologiya. Menedzhment, 2018, vol. 8, no. 2 (27), pp. 47−58.

13. Vertakova Yu. V., Risin I. E. Formirovanie sistemy monitoringa strukturnogo razvitiya regional’noy ekonomiki [Formation of a system for monitoring the structural development of the regional economy]. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski, 2019, no. 2, pp. 23−34. DOI: 10.22394/2079-1690-2019-1-2-23-34.

14. Official website of the RF Federal State Statistics Service. Available at: https://www.gks.ru/. Accessed 12.05.2019. (in Russ.).

15. Osnovaniya razmeshcheniya lineynykh ob”ektov federal’nogo i regional’nogo znacheniya na chuzhikh zemel’nykh uchastkakh: otchet o nauchno-issledovatel’skoy rabote [Grounds for placing linear objects of federal and regional significance on other people’s land: Research report]. St. Petersburg: SPb. State Univ., 2019. 133 p. (in Russ.).

16. Shanygin S. I. Strategicheskoe upravlenie organizatsiey: teoretiko-metodologicheskiy podkhod [Strategic management of the organization: Theoretical and methodological approach]. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2011. 187 p.