The impact of structural complexity on the sustainability of regional economic systems to shocks
https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2025-8-979-989
Abstract
Aim. The work aimed to study and measure quantitatively the relationship between the structural complexity of the economies of Russian regions and their sustainability to economic shocks.
Objectives. The work seeks to adapt the methods for assessing the structural complexity of regional economies taking into account Russian specifics; test the methods for assessing the sustainability of regional economies to shocks; perform the model analysis of the relationship between the economy structural complexity and sustainability to shocks using the example of 85 constituent entities of the Russian Federation (RF).
Methods. The methods included correlation-regression and cluster analysis to assess the relationship between economic complexity and sustainability to shocks while controlling for the level of economic development and other factors.
Results. Based on the analysis of data on 85 constituent entities of the Russian Federation for 2014–2023, a modified regional economic complexity index (RECI) and a regional shock sustainability index (RSI) were developed. The sustainability of regions to economic shocks was measured using a regression model. Clustering of regions by level of sustainability and economic complexity was performed. It was established that regions with a high level of gross regional product (GRP) but low economic complexity (for example, raw materials regions) demonstrate high volatility of economic growth and low sustainability to shocks. Significant differentiation of Russian regions by level of economic complexity and sustainability to shocks was revealed.
Conclusions. The study confirms the hypothesis that regions with a more complex economic structure are more resilient to economic shocks. Economic complexity was revealed to be a more significant factor in sustainability to shocks than the overall level of economic development measured by GRP per capita.
About the Authors
A. G. Polyakova
Moscow City University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Aleksandra G. Polyakova, D.Sc. in Economics, Professor, Deputy Director of the Institute of Economics, Management and Law
4 Vtoroy Selskohoziajstvenny dr., Moscow 129226
Competing Interests:
the authors declare no conflict of interest related to the publication of this article.
V. V. Kolmakov
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Kolmakov, D.Sc. in Economics, Associate Professor, Deputy Director of the Higher School of Finance
36 Stremyanny per., Moscow 115054
Competing Interests:
the authors declare no conflict of interest related to the publication of this article.
References
1. Smirnov E.N. Economic sanctions: Theory and international practice. Moscow: RuScience; 2024. 328 p. (In Russ.).
2. Lukin E.V. Fundamentals of the study of economic complexity. In: Karpova I.A., ed. Towards the heights of knowledge. Proc. 13th Int. sci.-pract. conf. (Noyabrsk, April 01-30, 2023.). In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Tyumen: Tyumen Industrial University; 2023:164-166. (In Russ.).
3. Hidalgo C. A., Hausmann R. The building blocks of economic complexity // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009. Vol. 106. No. 26. P. 10570–10575. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900943106
4. Hausmann R., Hidalgo C. A., Bustos S. et al. The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2014. 368 p. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9647.001.0001
5. Briguglio L., Cordina G., Farrugia N., Vella S. Economic vulnerability and resilience: Concepts and measurements // Oxford Development Studies. 2009. Vol. 37. No. 3. P. 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810903089893
6. Balland P.-A., Rigby D. The geography of complex knowledge // Economic Geography. 2017. Vol. 93. No. 1. P. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1205947
7. Balland P.-A., Broekel T., Diodato D. et al. The new paradigm of economic complexity // Research Policy. 2022. Vol. 51. No. 3. Article 104450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104450
8. Martin R., Sunley P. On the notion of regional economic resilience: Conceptualization and explanation // Journal of Economic Geography. 2015. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu015
9. Zemtsov S.P., Voloshinskaya A.A. Russian regional resilience under sanctions. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association. 2024;(3):54-83. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31737/22212264_2024_3_54-83
10. Polyakov S.V. Internet federalism and consolidation of civil society as a factor in sustainable development. In: Young scientists’ view of sustainable development problems. Proc. 4th Int. congr. of young scientists on sustainable development issues (Moscow, May 16-20, 2018). Vol. 5. Moscow: RuScience; 2019:132-138. (In Russ.).
11. Boschma R. Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience // Regional Studies. 2015. Vol. 49. No. 5. P. 733–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
12. Lyubimov I.L., Gvozdeva M.A., Kazakova M.V., Nesterova K.V. Economic complexity of Russian regions and their potential to diversify. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association. 2017;(2):94-122. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2017-34-2-4
13. Artem’ev N.V., Petrov A.D., Makovetskii M.Yu., et al. Sustainable development of the Russian Federation in the context of global challenges and threats to economic security. Moscow: Witte Moscow University; 2023. 210 p. (In Russ.).
14. Mikheeva N.N. Adaptation of the spatial structure of the Russian economy to external shocks. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2023;34(6):871-879. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700723060096 (In Russ.: Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2023;(6):207-219. https://doi.org/10.47711/0868-6351-201-207-219).
15. Tagarov B.Zh. The structure of the Russian economy as a factor in the implementation of the concept of sustainable development. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya = Fundamental Research. 2024;(12):127-132. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17513/fr.43751
16. Fedina E.V. The importance of taking into account the economic complexity of territories when assessing their export potential. Tamozhennoe regulirovanie. Tamozhennyi kontrol’. 2023;(7):42-48. (In Russ.).
17. Enhancing hybrid manufacturing with AI-driven real-time adaptive process control: Integrating machine learning models and robotic systems / B. Swathi, S.V. Polyakov, S.R. Kandavalli [et al.] // The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-14155-w
18. Polyakov S.V. The problem of cognitive opacity of artificial intelligence as a risk factor in the context of digital transformation. In: Ershova N.M., ed. Artificial intelligence and spiritual culture. Proc. Int. sci.-pract. conf. (Moscow, October 30, 2024). St. Petersburg: Scientia; 2025:94-97. (In Russ.).
19. Polyakov S.V. Virtual identity in modern society: Dialectic of real and digital space. In: Tarasov A.N., ed. Actual problems of philosophical anthropology and philosophy of culture. Proc. 3rd All-Russ. sci.-pract. conf. with int. particip. (Lipetsk, January 24-25, 2025). Lipetsk: Lipetsk State Pedagogical University named after P.P. Semenov-Tyan-Shansky; 2025:136-140. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Polyakova A.G., Kolmakov V.V. The impact of structural complexity on the sustainability of regional economic systems to shocks. Economics and Management. 2025;31(8):979-989. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2025-8-979-989
Views:
55
