Theoretical and methodological aspects of making allowance for dual management performance in the development strategy of an industrial enterprise

Aim. The presented study aims to substantiate the inclusion of dual management performance assessment in the development strategy of an industrial enterprise.

Tasks. The author describes the theoretical aspects of assessing the dual performance of the enterprise management system; develops methodological recommendations for making allowance for the dual performance of the management system in the development strategy of an industrial enterprise.

Methods. This study uses general methods of cognition (theoretical synthesis and comparative analysis) to investigate various aspects of the nature of assessment and to substantiate the formation of a new approach to the evolution of management in scientific literature based on the principles of functionality, harmony, and consistency and the estimated duality of management performance.

Results. The main result of the study is the development of a conceptual framework for making allowance for the dual performance of the management system of an industrial enterprise in the strategy for becoming the ‘engine of growth’. That said, the dual performance of the management decisions of an enterprise is identified using a triad of assessments: consolidation of organizational efforts aimed at ensuring the target stability of the management system; adaptive behavior of the management system with allowance for the functional and hierarchical relationships between its structural elements and crystallization of the leadership positions of the enterprise in the context of measuring its contribution to the socio-economic development of the enterprise’s region.

Conclusions. The methodological recommendations developed by the author will be useful to industrial enterprises whose management is focused on solving endogenous and exogenous problems of socio-economic development, to representatives of science dealing with strategic management issues, and to public authorities focused on identifying and supporting the ‘engines of growth’.

1. Golovina A.N., Levchenko R.Yu. Methodology for identifying and managing the “locomotives of growth” of the regional economy. Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra = Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. 2019;9(7-1):81-90. (In Russ.).

2. Stufflebeam D.L., Shinkfield A.J. Evaluation theory, models, and applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2007. 768 p.

3. Njama A.W. Determinants of effectiveness of a monitoring and evaluation system for projects: A case of Amref Kenya WASH programme. Nairobi: University of Nairobi; 2015. 108 p.

4. Kusek J.Z., Rist R.C. Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation: handbook for development practitioners. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2004. 248 p. URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/14926/296720PAPER0100steps.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 20.05.2022).

5. Funnell S.C., Rogers P.J. Purposeful program theory: Effective use of theories of change and logic models. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2011. 576 p.

6. Frankel N., Gage A. M&E fundamentals: A self-guided minicourse. Washington, DC: U.S. Agency for International Development; 2007. 55 p. URL: https://www.endvawnow.org/uploads/browser/files/M_E%20Fundamentals.pdf (accessed on 20.05.2022).

7. Tache F. Developing an integrated monitoring and evaluation flow for sustainable investment projects. Economia. Seria Management. 2011;14(2):380-391.

8. Otieno F.A.O. The roles of monitoring and evaluation in projects. In: Proc. 2nd Int. conf. on construction in developing countries: Challenges facing the construction industry in developing countries (Gabarone, 15-17 November 2000). Kanata: International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction; 2000:15-17.

9. Omonyo A.B. Lectures in project monitoring and evaluation for professional practitioners. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing; 2015. 244 p.

10. Carden E., Alkin M.C. Evaluation roots: An international perspective. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation. 2012;8(17):102-118. URL: https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/348/344 (accessed on 20.05.2022).

11. Katz I., Newton B.J., Shona B., Raven M. Evaluation theories and approaches; relevance for Aboriginal contexts. Sydney: Social Policy Research Center, University of New South Wales; 2016. 54 p. URL: https://www.aboriginalaffairs.nsw.gov.au/conversations/ochre/reports/Evaluation-theories-and-approaches-relevance-for-Aboriginal-contexts.pdf (accessed on 20.05.2022).

12. Patton M.Q. Utilization-focused evaluation. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2008. 688 p.

13. Shadish W.R. Evaluation theory is who we are. The American Journal of Evaluation. 1998;19(1):1-19. DOI: 10.1016/S1098-2140(99)80177-5

14. Kalita T.V. Problems of evaluating the quality of enterprise management. Ekonomika i sovremennyi menedzhment: teoriya i praktika. 2013;(29):79-86. (In Russ.).

15. Vinokurov V.A., Vinokurov A.A. Management quality as a factor in strengthening the market position of an enterprise. Standarty i kachestvo = Standards and Quality. 2005;(12):68- 73. (In Russ.).

16. Lavta J.K. The modern concept of the effectiveness of the management of the organization. Doct. econ. sci. diss. Moscow. 2000. 308 p. (In Russ.).

17. Katkov V. Who can restructure an industrial enterprise. Upravlenie kompaniei. 2000;(2):56- 59. (In Russ.).

18. Stein D., Valters C. Understanding theory of change in international development. London: The London School of Economics; 2012. 25 p. URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/56359/1/JSRP_Paper1_Understanding_theory_of_change_in_international_development_Stein_Valters_2012.pdf (accessed on 20.05.2022).

19. Myslyakova J.G. The institutionalization of the social business responsibility: Evolutional aspect. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii = Russian Journal of the Economic Theory. 2008;(3):45- 57. (In Russ.).

20. Andreeva E.L., Golovina A.N., Myslyakova Y.G. Universities as promoter of a new social and industrial development of national economy. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development. 2018;14(1-2):5-22. DOI: 10.1504/WREMSD.2018.089080

21. Myslyakova Yu.G., Usova N.V. Digital transformation of educational services of higher education institutions in the conditions of global challenges: Regional aspect. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik = Public Administration. E-Journal. 2020;(82):326-353. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2070-1381-2020-10105

22. Andreeva E.L., Karkh D.A., Myslyakova Yu.G. Conceptual approach to forming the basic code of neo-industrial development of a region. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Regions. 2017;13(3):732-745. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17059/2017-3-8