Preview

Economics and Management

Advanced search

Factors hindering the integration of Russian companies into digital platforms

https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2022-8-767-777

Abstract

Aim. The presented study aims to identify the main factors (and the degree of their influence) hindering the integration of companies into digital and non-digital platforms that are actively developing in the Russian economy and opening up new horizons of development, removing traditional organizational barriers and boundaries.

Tasks. The authors conduct a pilot qualitative study of twenty companies and twenty platform holders of different levels to identify, systemize, and rank factors affecting the decision of companies to integrate into a specific platform.

Methods. This study uses the methods of in-depth semi-structured interviews, content analysis, systematization, and Spearman’s rank correlation to investigate the relationship between the responses of company executives and platform holders.

Results. It is shown that nine main factors mentioned by both groups of respondents prevent companies from mutually beneficial cooperation with platforms. However, the ranking of determinants produces ambiguous results.

Conclusions. Research makes an ascertainable contribution to science. In particular, it complements existing scientific literature and business practices in several areas. Conceptually new information is obtained about what prevents companies from cooperating with platforms from the perspective of platform holders and company managers. The quantitative ranking of barriers for both groups is presented, making it possible to identify existing and potential problems that platform holders may face, evaluate them, and effectively manage the processes of overcoming barriers with allowance for their rating. Scientific results form a foundation for future research, since the information obtained during the interviews can be used as a basis for indepth quantitative analysis that would make it possible to further generalize and use the results.

 

About the Authors

S. A. Neganov
Ural State University of Railway Engineering
Russian Federation

Sergei A. Neganov, PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Management in Social and Economic Systems, Philosophy and History

66 Kolmogorova str., Ekaterinburg 620130



V. P. Neganova
Ural State University of Railway Engineering; Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Valentina P. Neganova, DSci, PhD in Economics, Professor, Professor at the Department of Management in Social and Economic Systems, Philosophy and History Ural State University of Railway Engineering, Head of the Center for the Development of Agro-Food Systems and Scientific Research Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

66 Kolmogorova str., Ekaterinburg 620130,

29 Moskovskaya str., Ekaterinburg 620014

 



References

1. Henneberg S.C., Mouzas S., Naudé P. Network pictures: Concepts and representations. European Journal of Marketing. 2016;40(3-4):408-429. DOI: 10.1108/03090560610648129

2. Evans P.C., Gawer A. The rise of the platform enterprise: A global survey. The Emerging Platform Economy Series. 2016;(1). URL: https://www.thecge.net/app/uploads/2016/01/PDF-WEB-Platform-Survey_01_12.pdf (accessed on 29.03.2022).

3. Möller K., Halinen A. Managing business and innovation networks – from strategic nets to business fields and ecosystems. Industrial Marketing Management. 2017;67:5-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.09.018

4. Payne A.F., Storbacka K., Frow P. Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2008;36(1):83-96. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-007-0070-0

5. Romero D., Molina A. Collaborative networked organisations and customer communities: Value co-creation and co-innovation in the networking era. Production Planning and Control. 2011;22(5-6):447-472. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2010.536619

6. Nambisan S., Baron R.A. Virtual customer environments: Testing a model of voluntary participation in value co-creation activities. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2009;26(4):388-406. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00667.x

7. De Oliveira D.T., Cortimiglia M.N. Value co-creation in web-based multisided platforms: A conceptual framework and implications for business model design. Business Horizons. 2017;60(6):747-758. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2017.07.002

8. Frow P., McColl-Kennedy J.R., Payne A. Co-creation practices: Their role in shaping a health care ecosystem. Industrial Marketing Management. 2016;56:24-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.03.007

9. Hewett K., Bearden W.O. Dependence, trust, and relational behavior on the part of foreign subsidiary marketing operations: Implications for managing global marketing operations. Journal of Marketing. 2001;65(4):51-66. DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.65.4.51.18380

10. Lu Y. Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. 2017;6:1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005

11. Coreynen W., Matthyssens P., Vanderstraeten J., van Witteloostuijn A. Unravelling the internal and external drivers of digital servitization: A dynamic capabilities and contingency perspective on firm strategy. Industrial Marketing Management. 2020;89:265-277. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.014

12. Adner R., Kapoor R. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal. 2010;31(3):306-333. DOI: 10.1002/smj.821

13. Vargo S.L., Lusch R.F. Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2008;36(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6

14. Hoyer W.D., Chandy R., Dorotic M., Krafft M., Singh S.S. Consumer cocreation in new product development. Journal of Service Research. 2010;13(3):283-296. DOI: 10.1177/1094670510375604

15. Nambisan S., Sawney M. Orchestration processes in network-centric innovation: Evidence from the field. Academy of Management Perspectives. 2011;25(3):40-57. DOI: 10.5465/AMP.2011.63886529

16. Prahalad C.K., Ramaswamy V. Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Business Review. 2000;(Jan.-Feb.):79-87. URL: https://hbr.org/2000/01/co-opting-customer-competence (accessed on 29.03.2022).

17. Sawhney M. Going beyond the product: Defining, designing and delivering customer solutions. In: Lusch R.F., Vargo S.L., eds. The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions. Armonk, NY; London: M.E. Sharpe; 2006:365-380.

18. Dubois A., Gadde L.-E. Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research. 2002;55(7):553-560. DOI: 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00195-8

19. Perks H., Kowalkowski C., Witell L., Gustafsson A. Network orchestration for value platform development. Industrial Marketing Management. 2017;67:106-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.002

20. Corbin J.M., Strauss A. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology. 1990;13(1):3-21. DOI: 10.1007/BF00988593

21. DiCicco-Bloom B., Crabtree B.F. The qualitative research interview. Medical Education. 2006;40(4):314-321. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x

22. Gwinner K.P., Gremler D.D., Bitner M.J. Relational benefits in services industries: The customer’s perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 1998;26(2):101-114. DOI: 10.1177/0092070398262002

23. Abbott W.F., Monsen R.J. On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Selfreported disclosure as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Journal. 1979;22(3):501-515. DOI: 10.2307/255740

24. Andreu L., Sánchez I., Mele C. Value co-creation among retailers and consumers: New insights into the furniture market. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2010;17(4):241- 250. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2010.02.001

25. Bharti K., Agrawal R., Sharma V. What drives the customer of world’s largest market to participate in value co-creation? Marketing Intelligence and Planning. 2014;32(4):413- 435. DOI: 10.1108/MIP-07-2013-0111

26. Kumar N., Stern L.W., Anderson J.C. Conducting interoganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal. 1993;36(6):1633-1651. DOI: 10.2307/256824

27. Bertaux D. From the life-history approach to the transformation of sociological practice. In: Bertaux D., ed. Biography and society: The life history approach in the social sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications; 1981:29-45.

28. Creswell J.W. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 1998. 403 р.

29. Cearley D.W., Burke B., Walker M.J. Top 10 strategic technology trends for 2016: Gartner research. Gartner. 2016. Feb. 29, 2016. URL: https://www.gartner.com/doc/3231617?srcId=1-6595640781 (accessed on 29.03.2022).

30. Grönroos C. Adopting a service logic for marketing. Marketing Theory. 2006;6(3):317-334. DOI: 10.1177/1470593106066794

31. Ardichvili A., Page V., Wentling T. Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2003;7(1):64- 77. DOI: 10.1108/13673270310463626

32. Gerber E.M., Hui J. Crowdfunding: Motivations and deterrents for participation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 2013;20(6):34. DOI: 10.1145/2530540

33. Balaji M.S., Roy S.K. Value co-creation with internet of things technology in the retail industry. Journal of Marketing Management. 2017;33(1-2):7-31. DOI: 10.1080/0267257X. 2016.1217914


Review

For citations:


Neganov S.A., Neganova V.P. Factors hindering the integration of Russian companies into digital platforms. Economics and Management. 2022;28(8):767-777. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2022-8-767-777

Views: 245


ISSN 1998-1627 (Print)