Inter-Component Relations in a Human-Centered Economy (Part 1)

Aim. The presented study aims to identify and interpret mutual support relationships between the key areas of a human-oriented economy.
Tasks. The authors formulate the problems of the relevance of examining economic relationships within the framework of various economic systems; substantiate the existence of economic support relationships and restrictions in the context of a human-centered economy; identify and structure normal and pathological economic support relationships between the spheres of a  human-oriented economy.
Methods. The theoretical and methodological basis of this study is based on the Wuxing Pentagram.
Results. The authors present their view of economic support relationships in a human-centered economy as a result of interaction between its spheres: natural-material, social-service, information-digital, creatosphere and cognitive sphere. The resource (human needs) that ensures the interaction between the components of the economic system is identified. Normal support relationships are determined: natural-material sphere — social-service sphere; social-service sphere –information-digital sphere; information-digital sphere — creatosphere; creatosphere — cognitive sphere; cognitive sphere — natural-material sphere. Pathological support relationships are detected: social-service sphere — natural-material sphere; information-digital sphere — socialservice sphere; creatosphere — information-digital sphere; cognitive sphere — creatosphere; natural-material sphere — cognitive sphere.
Conclusions. By defining and understanding inter-component support relationships in the context of a human-oriented economy, it becomes possible to determine directions for their regulation to ensure productive development of the economic system as a whole and each person in particular.

1. Mentsiev A.U., Khaliev M.S.U., Guzueva E.R., Mentsiev A.U., Ashakhanova M.Z. Digi talization

2. as a new stage in the formation of economic relations. Proc. int. sci. conf. “Far East Con” (ISCFEC).

3. (Vladivostok, Oct. 1-4, 2019). Dordrecht: Atlantis Press; 2020:3096-3100. (Advances in Economics,

4. Business and Management Research. Vol. 128). DOI: 10.2991/aebmr.k.200312.443

5. Chekmarev V.V. The efficiency of economic relations in the new economy. Journal of Economic

6. Regulation. 2018;9(1):23-32. DOI: 10.17835/2078-5429.2018.9.1.023-032

7. Winder G.M., Le Heron R. Assembling a Blue Economy moment? Geographic engagement with

8. globalizing biological-economic relations in multi-use marine environments. Dialogues in Human

9. Geography. 2017;7(1):3-26. DOI: 10.1177/2043820617691643

10. Pavlov M.Yu. Human creative potential as a challenge for contemporary economic theory. Vestnik

11. Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie = Proceedings of

12. Voronezh State University. Series: Economics and Management. 2019;(1):11-16. (In Russ.).

13. Boush G.D., Razumov V.I. Methodology of scientific research (in PhD and doctoral dissertations).

14. Moscow: INFRA-M; 2020. 227 p. (In Russ.).

15. Epstein D.B. On the new industrial society. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii = The Economic

16. Revival of Russia. 2016;(4):38-45. (In Russ.).

17. Mustafaeva Z.A. Transformation of the service sector in a post-industrial society. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Povolzhskii region. Obshchestvennye nauki = University Proceedings.

18. Volga Region. Social Sciences. 2007; 3: 66-73. (In Russ.).

19. Gribanov Yu.I. Digital transformation of socio-economic systems based on the development of the

20. service integration institution. Doct. econ. sci. diss. Synopsis. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg

21. State University of Economics; 2019. 40 p. (In Russ.).

22. Pitukhin E., Kekkonen A., Sigova S. Transparent informational environment as a strategy for

23. upgrading attractiveness of higher educational university for students. Universitetskoe upravlenie:

24. praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2015;(2):94-103. (In Russ.).

25. Romanova T.F., Klimuk V.V., Andreeva O.V., Sukhoveeva A.A., Otrishko M.O. Digitalization as an

26. urgent trend in the development of the social sphere. In: Popkova E., Sergi B., eds. Digital economy:

27. Complexity and variety vs. rationality. Cham: Springer International Pub lishing; 2020:931-939.

28. (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Vol. 87). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29586-8_106

29. Babkin A.V., ed. Formation of the digital economy and industry: New challenges. St. Pe tersburg:

30. Polytechnic University Publ.; 2018. 660 p. (In Russ.).

31. Benczúr A., Molnár B. On the notion of information – Info-sphere, the world of formations. In:

32. th IEEE Int. conf. on cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom). (Budapest, Feb. 14, 2019).

33. New York: IEEE; 2018:000033-000038. DOI: 10.1109/CogInfoCom.2018.8639904

34. Stepanov A.A., Savina M.V. Creative economy: Essence and problems of development. Upravlenie

35. ekonomicheskimi sistemami: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal = Management of Economic Systems:

36. Scientific Electronic Journal. 2013;(12):104-114. (In Russ.).

37. Tierney W., Hardy J.H., Ebersole C.R., Leavitt K., Viganola D., Clemente E.G., Gordon M., Dreber

38. A., Johannesson M., Pfeiffer T., Eric Luis Uhlmann E.L. Creative destruction in science. Organizational

39. Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2020;161:291-309. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002

40. Melkers J. Focus issue: Science- and technology-based economic development. Economic Development

41. Quarterly. 2004;18(2):95-96. DOI: 10.1177/0891242404263894