Innovative Growth of the Virtual Economy: A Regulatory Paradigm Shift

Aim. The presented study aims to harmonize the understanding of the innovative growth of the virtual economy within the framework of a regulatory approach from the perspective of the evolution of regulatory mechanisms.
Tasks. The authors identify the major conditions and elements of the virtual economy; clarify the definition of the virtual economy; determine the essential characteristics of the innovative growth of the virtual economy; develop a multidimensional matrix of tools for measuring the innovative growth of the virtual economy within the framework of a regulatory approach.
Methods. This study uses the methods of scientific analysis and synthesis as well as comparative and systems approach to examine the reflection of innovative growth in the evolution of regulatory mechanisms that determine economic behavior.
Results. The acceleration of economic virtualization during the 2020–2021 pandemic has exacerbated the need for a scientific analysis of the ways and directions of innovative economic growth with allowance for intangible, primarily virtual factors, which include traditional symbolic components implemented on the basis of digital tools. The conducted analysis makes it possible to identify four main dimensions that determine directions for the innovative growth of the virtual economy: adaptation to new categories of entities to the extent of personification based on big data; development of new behavioral models; development of institutions and ecosystems; prioritization of a meaningful requirement for harmony and aesthetics on the part of users.
Conclusions. A study of the multidimensional model of innovative growth of the virtual economy will make it possible to improve both the decision-making of individual and group entities, and the regulatory mechanisms used by the government.

1. Samuelson P.A. Economics: An introductory analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.; 1948. 861 p. (Russ. ed.: Samuelson P. Ekonomika (in 2 vols.). Vol. 1. Moscow: Algon; 1997. 415 p.).

2. Machlup F. The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1962. 416 p.

3. Ryle G. The concept of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1949. 334 p.

4. Scheffler I. Conditions of knowledge: An introduction to epistemology and education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1978. 207 p.

5. Boyko S.V., Pokrovskaja N.N. Social forecasting and problems of the future. Nauchnaya mysl’. 2021;15(1-1):27-35. (In Russ.).

6. Bell D. The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. London: Heinemann; 1974. 507 p.

7. Slobodskoi A.L. Influence of the conceptual apparatus on the adequacy of the approach to the management of hired labor. In: Personnel management: Coll. conf. pap. St. Petersburg: Info-Da; 2015:30-34. (In Russ.).

8. Pokrovskaia N.N. Dynamics of criterion models and value-semantic scales in the regulatory mechanisms of innovative economic growth. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Economics Series. 2014;(2):100-108. (In Russ.).

9. Wei F., Pokrovskaia N.N. Digitizing of regulative mechanisms on the Masterchain platform for the individualized competence portfolio. In: Proc. 2017 IEEE VI Forum on strategic partnership of universities and enterprises of hi-tech branches (Science. Education. Inno vations). (St. Petersburg, Nov. 15-17, 2017). New York: IEEE; 2017:73-76. DOI: 10.1109/IVForum.2017.8246055

10. Parker G.G., Van Alstyne M.W., Sangeet P.Ch. Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy — and how to make them work for you. New York: W.W. Nor ton & Co.; 2016. 352 p.

11. Klechikov A.V. The current state and prospects for the development of aggregators in the digital economy of the Russian Federation. International Journal of Open Information Technologies. 2018;6(5):33-38. (In Russ.).

12. Boiko S.V., Garin A.K., Pokrovskaia N.N. Game currencies as a value-regulatory mechanism in the context of digitalization of communications. In: PR and advertising technologies in modern society. Proc. All-Russ. sci.-pract. conf. St. Petersburg: Polytech-Press; 2020:58-64. (In Russ.).

13. Khramova N.N. News aggregators as journalism of the future. Mediasreda. 2017;(12):48-52. (In Russ.).

14. Kiryanov A.E., Masyuk N.N., Zakharov A.M. Taxi aggregators as infrastructural transforming technologies (drivers) of digital economy. Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: ekonomika i upravlenie = ASR: Economics and Management (Azimuth of Scientific Research). 2020;9(3):175-179. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26140/anie-2020-0903-0038

15. Golohvastov D.V., Pokrovskaya N.N., Smirnov P.D. Systemic normative regulators of the market agents’ behaviour of in the frame of the economics of knowledge. Sotsiologiya i pravo = Sociology and Law. 2014;(4):12-23. (In Russ.).

16. Brusakova I.A., Zaozerskaya N.I., Karpov K.A., Kosukhina M.A., Kuz’mina A.D., Pokrovskaya N.N., Raichuk Yu.A., Shpakovskaya I.A. Digital transformation of business and new economic models. St. Petersburg: ETU “LETI”; 2021. 144 p.

17. Brusakova I. Cognitive technologies of information managements of business processes of the digital enterprises. International Journal of Advanced Information Science and Technology. 2016;5(1):73-76. DOI: 10.15693/ijaist/2016.v5i1.73-76

18. Polovyan A.V., Polshkova M.Yu. Effectiveness evaluation of the electronic business functioning of in the context of the innovative development of information technologies. Vesti Avtomobil’nodorozhnogo instituta = Bulletin of the Automobile and Highway Institute. 2021;(2):70-78. (In Russ.).

19. Il’ina I.A., Pokrovskaya N.N., Khashkovskii A.V. Complementarity of bipolar problems: Internet addiction and marketing communication. In: Modern trends and technologies for the development of the potential of regions. Proc. 1st Nat. sci.-pract. conf. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics; 2020:130-136. (In Russ.).

20. Ababkova M.Yu., Al Hajj B.B.Kh. The influence of branding on consumer awareness. In: PR and advertising technologies in modern society. Engineers of senses: Transformation of competencies and global challenges of the communication industry. St. Petersburg: Polytech-Press; 2021:14-18. (In Russ.).

21. Pokrovskaia N.N., Tyulin A.V. Psychological features of the regulatory mechanisms emerging in the digital space. Tekhnologii v infosfere = Technology and Language. 2021;2(2):106-125. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.48417/technolang.2021.02.11

22. Vylkova E.S., ed. The versatility of today’s pandemic reality. St. Petersburg: Publishing and Printing Association of Universities; 2021. 300 p. (In Russ.).

23. Sveiby K.E. The new organizational wealth: Managing and measuring knowledge-based assets. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler; 1997. 275 p.

24. Slobodskoi A.L., Terebkova T.A., Garin A.K. Digital education and the new technological generation: Demand for new content in learning. In: Data science. Proc. Int. sci.-pract. conf. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Economics; 2020:287-289. (In Russ.).

25. Golohvastov D.V., Ababkova M.Yu., Ilyina I.A. Social communication approach to the analysis of changes in the labor behavior of economic agents. Vestnik Evraziiskoi nauki = The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2020;12(4):33. (In Russ.).

26. Nelson J.W. Virtual property problem: What property rights in virtual resources might look like, how they might work, and why they are a bad idea. McGeorge Law Review. 2010;41(2):281-309. URL: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1235&context=mlr (accessed on 20.07.2021).

27. Velichkovsky B.B., Gusev A.N., Vinogradova V.F., Arbekova O.A. Cognitive control and a sense of presence in virtual environments. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya = Experimental Psychology. 2016;9(1):5-20. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2016090102

28. Marshalko R. Sources of income: How the economy developed in video games. DTF. Sept. 24, 2020. URL: https://dtf.ru/gameindustry/216748-istochniki-zarabotka-kak-razvivalas-ekonomika-v-videoigrah (accessed on 20.07.2021). (In Russ.).

29. Pokrovskaia N.N., Garin A.K. Participatory design of communication space: Indie game Minecraft as an implementation of the concept of distributed networks. In: PR and advertising technologies in modern society. Proc. 13th All-Russ. sci.-pract. conf. St. Petersburg: Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University; 2018:104-108. (In Russ.).

30. Bukht R., Heeks R. Defining, conceptualising and measuring the digital economy. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii: obrazovanie, nauka, novaya ekonomika = International Organisations Research Journal. 2018;13(2):143-172. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2018-02-07

31. Brusakova I.A. Methods and models for estimating the maturity of the innovation structure. Upravlencheskie nauki = Management Sciences in Russia. 2019;9(3):56-62. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2304-022X-2019-9-3-56-62

32. Wei F., Pokrovskaia N.N. Digital technologies in agriculture and forestry and the experience of sectoral interactions between Russia and China. In: System analysis in design and management. Proc. 23rd Int. sci.-pract. conf. St. Petersburg: Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University; 2019:353-359. (In Russ.).

33. Krumm S., Kanthak J., Hartmann K., Hertel G. What does it take to be a virtual team player? The knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics required in virtual teams. Human Performance. 2016;29(2):123-142. DOI: 10.1080/08959285.2016.1154061

34. Abdrakhmanova G.A., Dem’yanova A.V., Kovaleva G.G., Kotsemir M.N., Strel’tsova E.A., Suslov A.B., Utyatina K.E. Indicators of the digital economy: Stat. Coll. Moscow: NRU HSE; 2021. 124 p. (In Russ.).

35. Kapitsa S.I., Pokrovskaia N.N., Garin A.K. Game regulatory mechanisms in the gamification of digital education and knowledge transfer. In: Technologies of PR and advertising in modern society. Engineers of senses: Transformation of competencies and global challenges of the communication industry. Proc. sci.-pract. conf. with int. particip. St. Petersburg: Polytech-Press; 2021:167-175. (In Russ.).

36. Vylkova E.S., ed. Russia and the world during and after the COVD-19 pandemic: challenges and opportunities. St. Petersburg: Publishing and Printing Association of Universities; 2020. 274 p. (In Russ.).

37. Strigin A. Remote game drive: Game production has become a steadily growing sector of the economy. Rossiiskaya gazeta. Apr. 06, 2021. URL: https://rg.ru/2021/04/06/reg-szfo/proizvodstvo-igrstalo-stabilno-razvivaiushchejsia-otrasliu-ekonomiki.html (accessed on 20.07.2021). (In Russ.).

38. Novikov V.S. Study of the norms of the institutional environment of the virtual economy. Estestvenno-gumanitarnye issledovaniya = Natural Humanitarian Studies. 2021;(33):164-170. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24412/2309-4788-2021-10849

39. Pokrovskaya N.N. Evolution of labor models in the context of digital technologies. In: System analysis in design and management. Proc. 24th Int. sci. and educ.-pract. conf. (in 3 pts.). Pt. 3. St. Petersburg: Polytech-Press; 2020:369-376. (In Russ.).

40. Ferrell J., Kline K. Facilitating trust and communication in virtual teams. People and Strategy. 2018;41(2):30-35. URL: https://www.nxtbook.com/ygsreprints/HRPS/hrps_41_2_2018/index.php?startid=30#/p/30 (accessed on 20.07.2021).

41. Ababkova M.Yu., Pokrovskaya N.N. Digital economy of knowledge and the future of the labor market as factors in the evolution of the cognitive model of University 4.0. In: Architecture of university education: Modern universities in a single information space. Proc. 3rd Nat. sci.-method. conf. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Economics; 2019:5-12. (In Russ.).

42. The growth in the number of freelancers in Russia was estimated at 76%. Kommersant. Dec. 24, 2020. URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4627662 (accessed on 20.07.2021). (In Russ.).

43. Asanov I., Mavlikeeva M. Can group identity explain gender gap in recruitment process? In: Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik 2020: Gender Economics. Kiel, Hamburg: ZBW – Leibniz Information Centre for Economics. 2020. URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/224647/1/vfs-2020-pid-40525.pdf (accessed on 20.07.2021).

44. Pokrovskaia N.N. Leisure and entertainment as a creative space-time manifold in a post-modern world. In: Ozturk R.G. Handbook of research on the impact of culture and society on the entertainment industry. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2014:21-38. (Advances in Media, Entertainment, and the Arts).

45. Pokrovskaia N., Margulyan Ya., Bulatetskaia A., Snisarenko S. Intellectual analysis for educational path cognitive modeling: Digital knowledge for post-modern value creation. Wisdom. 2020;14(1):69-76. DOI: 10.24234/wisdom.v14i1.305

46. Standing G. The precariat: The new dangerous class. London, New York: Bloomsbury Acade mic; 2011. 208 p.

47. Shkaratan O.I., Karacharovskiy V.V., Gasiukova E.N. Precariat: Theory and empirical analysis (polls in Russia, 1994-2013 data). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Research. 2015;(12):99-110. (In Russ.).

48. Pokrovskaya N.N. Time resource in labor relations (work schedule and normative culture of workers). Trud i sotsial’nye otnosheniya = Labour and Social Relations Journal. 2008;(1):31-37. (In Russ.).

49. Kovalenko E.V., Rozentsvaig A.I., Bakhteeva E.I., Soshnikova I.V., Sherpaev V.I., Novikova Yu.A. The development of remote workers with disability for entrepreneurship system. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education. 2020;23(1):1-10.

50. Pokrovskaya N.N., Burova N.V., Konoplyannik T.M. Forms of employment of highly qualified industrial specialists: The impact of precarization on intellectual capital. In: Planning and provision of training for the industrial and economic complex of the region. Proc. 18th All-Russ. sci.- pract. conf. (St. Petersburg, Nov. 20-21, 2019). Vol. 1. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI”; 2019:95-98. (In Russ.).

51. Yakobovitch D. The future of work is remote and distributed our digital first society has been accelerated by COVID-19. The StartUP. Apr. 29, 2020. URL: https://medium.com/swlh/futureofwork-remote-distributed-covid19-2608bc5c76ac (accessed on 20.07.2021).

52. Theurer C.P., Tumasjan A., Welpe I.M. Contextual work design and employee innovative work behavior: When does autonomy matter? PLoS ONE. 2018;13(10):e0204089. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204089

53. Kalanov G., Dubkovskaya V. Reddit traders bust shortists at GameStop shares. What’s happening? RBC. Jan. 28, 2021. URL: https://quote.rbc.ru/news/article/601281b09a7947c3df186842 (accessed on 20.07.2021). (In Russ.).

54. Ababkova M.Yu. Paratextual ads for brand promotion. In: Actual problems of modern political science: Coll. sci. pap. St. Petersburg: Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University; 2020:62-68. (In Russ.).

55. Ababkova M.Yu., Pokrovskaya N.N. Digital advertising as a tool of intent marketing. In: PR and advertising technologies in modern society. Proc. All-Russ. sci.-pract. conf. St. Petersburg: PolytechPress; 2020:9-14. (In Russ.).

56. Klechikov A.V., Pryanikov M.M., Chugunov A.V. Blockchain technologies and their application in government administration. International Journal of Open Information Technologies. 2017;5(12):123-129. (In Russ.).

57. Ababkova M.Yu., Leontyeva V.L., Pokrovskaia N.N. Development of neuro-communication and cognitive technologies to compress social space in moments of crisis isolation. Vestnik Evraziiskoi nauki = The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2020;12(4):24. (In Russ.).

58. Sarkhanyants K. Epic Games filed a complaint against Apple with the European Commission. Kommersant. Feb. 17, 2021. URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4693882 (accessed on 20.07.2021). (In Russ.).

59. Gelikh O.Ya., Levitskaya A.N., Pokrovskaia N.N. Sociological analysis of attitudes of professional growth and career in the context of digital economy and knowledge society. Sotsio logiya i pravo = Sociology and Law. 2020;(3):12-24. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.35854/2219-6242-2020-3-12-24

60. Unger R.M. The knowledge economy. London: Verso; 2019. 304 p.

61. Gromova E.A. To the question of experimental legal regime for creating digital innovations (regulatory sandboxes). Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo = Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series “Law”. 2019;19(3):36-40. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.14529/law190307

62. Piskarev D.M., Slepov V.A. Methods for managing the risk of emergency of unjustified economic privileges using a digital experimental environment sensitivity ratio. Finansovye rynki i banki = Financial Markets and Banks. 2020;(5):19-23. (In Russ.).

63. Shcheglov K.A., Shcheglov A.Yu. Implementation of sandbox method for potentially malicious applications. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Priborostroenie = Journal of Instrument Engineering. 2017;60(10):940-944. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17586/0021-3454-2017-60-10-940-944

64. Pokrovskaya N.N. Rationality of economic behavior. Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena = Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences. 2007;9(46):128-137. (In Russ.).

65. Baumol W. On the theory of the expansion of the firm. The American Economic Review. 1962;52(5):1078-1087.

66. Brusakova I.A. Tools for system analysis of the efficiency of a digital enterprise. In: System analysis in design and management. Proc. 19th Int. sci.-pract. conf. St. Petersburg: Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University; 2015:16-21. (In Russ.).

67. Brusakova I.A., Kosuhina M.A. The fuzzy logic method for innovation performance measurement. In: Proc. 18th Int. conf. on soft computing and measurements (SCM). (St. Petersburg, May 19-21, 2015). New York: IEEE; 2015:291-293. DOI: 10.1109/SCM.2015.7190487

68. Pokrovskaia N.N., Boyko S.V. Digital economy of knowledge and social rating as a form of reindustrialization of the economy and society. Nauchnaya mysl’. 2020;14(4-1):41-48. (In Russ.).

69. Csikszentmihalyi M. Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1975. 264 p.

70. Avakova E.B., Pokrovskaia N.N. Sociological analysis of innovative activity as creativization of routine and routinization of creative work. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2017;(4):83-89. (In Russ.).

71. Grant C.A., Wallace L.M., Spurgeon P.C. An exploration of the psychological factors affecting remote e-worker’s job effectiveness, well-being and work-life balance. Employee Relations. 2013;35(5):527-546. DOI: 10.1108/ER-08-2012-0059

72. Elliott S. Improving productivity for remote and distributed work forces. Entrepreneur. May 27, 2020. URL: https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/350724 (accessed on 20.07.2021).