The Project as the Way to Implement Entrepreneurial Activity in the 21^st Century

Aim. The aim of this paper is to study and develop theoretical and methodological basis for understanding the phenomenon of the “project” and its role in the implementation of entrepreneurial activity in the 21^st century.

Tasks. The main objective of this paper is to conceptualize the category of the “project” in the modern entrepreneurial paradigm. The widespread dissemination of this concept indicates that in the 21^st century, the content side of entrepreneurial activity is gradually changing towards its humanization, showing a shift from exclusively economic goals towards ethical and aesthetic motives.

Methods. The methodological basis of the paper is a transdisciplinary attitude that combines the philosophical and ethical provisions of the theory of synergy, metaethics, semantic theories that underpin the scientific research in the field of entrepreneurship theory. It also provides a synthesis of the methodology of individualism and holism, which allows expanding the development of the entrepreneurship theory according to the intersubjective nature of economic reality and the endogenous growth theory.

Results. Today’s interpretation of the concept of the “project” is gradually acquiring a different meaning. Increasingly, there is a tendency to use this word in connection to socially significant problems from an educational project to a charitable project. The category of the “project” implies the connection between the public good and the private need.
Such a shift in emphasis indicates that there is a universal need for understanding entrepreneurship as a useful activity of great social significance. The task of the theory of entrepreneurship is to create a symbolic system of the modern entrepreneurial paradigm, based on the humanism principles, responsibility, biophilia, and education, implying the awareness of market participants about the potential impact of their actions on the entire eco-system.

Conclusions. We consider the restrictions in response to anthropogenic human activities as a source of new entrepreneurial opportunities and as an integral positive element of the modern economy. In this basis, the restrictions provide freedom to innovative actions that will help to maintain the environment while eliminating environmental threats. However, the change cannot happen without adequate information flows, appropriate regulations, and viable market institutions. The modern world can be characterized as a world of uncertainties; therefore there is a constant transition from one environmental crisis to another. Each environmental crisis is an unintended consequence of previous economic innovations and can be resolved with new ones. While governments will develop regulatory frameworks that stimulate environmental protection and regeneration, they cannot act as quickly as entrepreneurs who can implement innovations and stimulate corresponding creative destruction. Governments’ capacity is limited and their speed of response is slow due to their need to meet the interests of different groups; entrepreneurs destroy such interests. Modern technological possibilities multiply the choice and, consequently, the freedom. As practice shows, no legislative restrictions can hold back a “civilizational” development for a long time, and this necessitates an awareness of responsibility.
Therefore, we consider the development of the ethical foundations of entrepreneurial activity as the most promising investment. In the light of this, one should abandon the established use of the entrepreneurship concept, put a new essence into it, and develop new categories that would correspond to the content side of entrepreneurial activity.

1. Renan E. De l’origine du langage. Paris: Michel-Lévy frères; 1858. 258 p. (Russ. ed.: Renan E. O proiskhozhdenii yazyka. Voronezh: V. Goldstein Print.; 1866. 126 p.).

2. Defoe D. An essay upon projects. Glasgow: Good Press; 2019. 220 p.

3. Fedorov N.F. Works. Moscow: Mysl’; 1982. 711 p. (In Russ.).

4. Masloboeva O.D. Research programs in the context of the modern scientific picture of the world. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Economics; 2016. 123 p. (In Russ.).

5. A Guide to the project management body of knowledge. 5 th ed. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute; 2013. 616 p. URL: https://repository.dinus.ac.id/docs/ajar/PMBOKGuide_5th_Ed.pdf (accessed on 26.11.2020).

6. Seymour T.J., Hussein S. The history of project management. International. Journal of Management and Information Systems. 2014;18(4):233-240. DOI: 10.19030/ijmis.v18i4.8820

7. Kuura A. Blackburn R.A., Lundin R.A. Entrepreneurship and projects – Linking segregated communities. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 2014;30(2):214-230. DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2013.10.002

8. APM body of knowledge. 5 th ed. Princes Risborough: Association for Project Management; 2006. 198 p.

9. Cleland D.I., Ireland L.R. Project management: Strategic design and implementation. 5 th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2006. 523 p.

10. Lundin R.A., Söderholm A. A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 1995;11(4):437-455. DOI: 10.1016/0956-5221(95)00036-U

11. Katila R., Chen E.L., Piezunka H. All the right moves: How entrepreneurial firms compete effectively. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. 2012;6(2):116-132. DOI: 10.1002/sej.1130

12. Guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK ® guide). Moscow: Olymp-Business; 2019. 974 p. (In Russ.).

13. Blank S., Dorf B. The startup owner’s manual: The step-by-step guide for building a great company. Pescadero: K & S Ranch; 2012. 608 p.

14. Salamzadeh A., Kawamorita Kesim H. Startup companies: Life cycles and challenges. In: Proc. 4 th Int. conf. on employment, education and entrepreneurship (EEE). (Belgrade, 14-16, 2015). 2015:15-24. URL: http://www.eee-conference.com/_img/arhiva/2015/eee_2015_book_i.pdf (accessed on 26.11.2020).

15. Baccarini D. The concept of project complexity – A review. International Journal of Project Management. 1996;14(4):201-204. DOI: 10.1016/0263-7863(95)00093-3

16. Williams T.M. The need for new paradigms for complex projects. International Journal of Project Management. 1999;17(5):269-273. DOI: 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00047-7

17. Huemann M., Martinsuo M. In project management, uncertainty is a great opportunity. International Journal of Project Management. 2016;34(6):1026-1027. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.001

18. Turner J.R., Cochrane R.A. Goals-and-methods matrix: Coping with projects with ill-defined goals and/or methods of achieving them. International Journal of Project Management. 1993;11(2):93-102. DOI: 10.1016/0263-7863(93)90017-H

19. Becker A., Knyphausen-Aufsess D., Brem A. Beyond traditional developmental models: A fresh perspective on entrepreneurial new venture creation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing. 2015;7(2):152-172. DOI: 10.1504/IJEV.2015.068591

20. De Meyer A., Loch C.H., Pich M.T. Managing project uncertainty: From variation to chaos. MIT Sloan Management Review. 2002;43(2):60-67. URL: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/managingproject-uncertainty-from-variation-to-chaos/ (accessed on 07.12.2020).

21. Lindgren M., Packendorff J. A project-based view of entrepreneurship: Towards action-orientation, seriality and collectivity. In: Steyaert C., Hjorth D., eds. New movements in entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar; 2003:86-102. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ef88/26d7c1c48a6321a68c1a40f76c03074c21bf.pdf (accessed on 07.12.2020).

22. Salamzadeh A. New venture creation: Controversial perspectives and theories. Economic Analysis. 2015;48(3-4):101-109.

23. Rasmussen E. Understanding academic entrepreneurship: Exploring the emergence of university spin-off ventures using process theories. International Small Business Journal. 2011;29(5):448-471. DOI: 10.1177/0266242610385395

24. Levie J., Lichtenstein B.B. A terminal assessment of stages theory: Introducing a dynamic states approach to entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2010;34(2):317-350. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00377.x

25. Bhave M.P. A process model of entrepreneurial venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing. 1994;9(3):223-242. DOI: 10.1016/0883-9026(94)90031-0

26. Engwall M. The project concept(s): On the unit of analysis in the study of project management. In: Lundin R.A., Midler C., eds. Projects as arenas for renewal and learning processes. Boston, MA: Springer Verlag; 1998:25-35. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5691-6_3

27. Artto K., Wikström K. What is project business? International Journal of Project Management. 2005;23(5):343-353. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.03.005

28. Packendorff J. Inquiring into the temporary organization: New directions for project management research. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 1995;11(4):319-333. DOI: 10.1016/09565221(95)00018-Q

29. Winter M., Andersen E.S., Elvin R., Levene R. Focusing on business projects as an area for future research: An exploratory discussion of four different perspectives. International Journal of Project Management. 2006;24(8):699-709. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.005

30. Martinsuo M., Gemuenden H.G., Huemann M. Toward strategic value from projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2012;30(6):637-638. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.03.006

31. Nair S., Paulose H., Palacios M., Tafur J. Service orientation: Effectuating business model innovation. The Service Industries Journal. 2013;33(9-10):958-975. DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2013.746670

32. Langmaack L., Zharovskikh D. The project-based view of entrepreneurship: Exploring the projectbased view and its implications for startups. Umeå: Umeå School of Business and Economics, Umeå University; 2017. 112 p. URL: http://umu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1070093/FULLTEXT01.pdf (accessed on 09.12.2020).

33. Gemünden H.G., Lehner P., Kock A. The project-oriented organization and its contribution to innovation. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(1):147-160. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.009

34. Blank S. What’s a startup? First principles. Steve Blank. Jan. 25. 2010. URL: https://steveblank.com/2010/01/25/whats-a-startup-first-principles/ (accessed on 09.12.2020).