Assessing the Quality of Management of Transformation Processes in Economic Systems
https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2020-9-952-956
Abstract
Aim. The presented study aims to develop the methodology for assessing the quality of management of organizational transformation processes.
Tasks. To achieve the set aim, the authors solve the following problems: determine the essence and content of socio-economic transformation, formulate quality assurance principles for the management of transformation processes, draw attention to the problem of selecting a unified quality criterion for the management of organizational transformation processes.
Methods. This study uses general scientific methods of cognition, including analysis and synthesis. It also applies a systems approach to identify the major problems of assessing the quality of management of transformation processes, including the problem of selecting a unified quality criterion for the management of transformation processes and formulating the principles of ensuring the quality of management of transformation processes.
Results. The global problem of managing transformation processes in the economic system consists in the complexity of the managed processes, which increases due to the multidimensionality, mutual influence, and the resulting uncertainty of interactions between the elements of the system. It is concluded that the methodology for assessing the quality of management of transformation processes is based on the principle of integrating separate measures to improve the quality of management of system elements into a single system of management actions and the principle of ensuring that management actions are primarily aimed at preventing possible negative consequences of the transformation of economic systems, i.e. reducing the potential impact of unfavorable events and their consequences. To assess the effectiveness of targeted management actions and productive actions aimed at organizing, controlling, and guiding the transformation process, the authors actualize the problem of selecting an adequate quality criterion for the management of transformation processes in economic systems and put forward a hypothesis about a possible unified criterion of management quality.
Conclusions. The principle of integrating separate measures to improve the quality of management of system elements and the principle of ensuring that management actions are aimed at preventing possible negative consequences lie at the core of the methodology for assessing the quality of management of transformation processes in economic systems. The quality assessment methodology should be developed in the direction of finding a unified quality criterion for managing transformation processes in economic systems.
About the Authors
M. V. MalyshkinaRussian Federation
Mariya V. Malyshkina - Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
44/A Lermontovskiy Ave., St. Petersburg, 190103
M. V. Miroslavskaya
Russian Federation
Marianna V. Miroslavskaya - Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor of the Management and Organizations Department
1, 1st Krasnoarmeyskaya Str., St. Petersburg, 190005
References
1. Makarov A.D., Smeshko O.G., Shmatko A.D. Ensuring the growth of the innovation sector of the Russian economy. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management. 2015;(8):15-18. (In Russ.).
2. Verzilin D.N., Sokolov B.V., Yusupov R.M. Neocybernetics: State of research and development prospects. In: System analysis in design and management. Proc. 23rd Int. sci.-pract. conf. St. Petersburg: Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University; 2019:81-98. (In Russ.).
3. Zubkov V.I. Innovation of quality management processes in complex technical systems. Vestnik Ufimskogo gosudarstvennogo aviatsionnogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Vestnik USATU. 2012;16(6):242-251. (In Russ.).
4. Dvas G.V. Management of the regional economy based on the theory of reliability. St. Petersburg: Nauka; 2005. 359 p. (In Russ.).
5. Dvas G.V. Impact of uncertainty on decision making in the management system of transition economies. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie = Administrative Consulting. 2005;(1):152-167. (In Russ.).
6. Okrepilov V.V. Improving the quality of public administration – the main factor in increasing the sustainability of territories. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii = Russian Journal of the Economic Theory. 2016;(3):27-39. (In Russ.).
7. Vapne G. Assessment criterion in systems analysis. In: System analysis in design and management. Proc. 23rd Int. sci.-pract. conf. St. Petersburg: Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University; 2019:154-165. (In Russ.).
8. Shavrov A.V., Lipa O.A. Management quality assessments and their relationship. In: Theory and practice of construction and operation of automated control systems for technological processes (ACS TP). Proc. Int. sci. conf. “Control–2003”. Moscow: Moscow Power Engineering Institute; 2003:39-44. (In Russ.).
9. Lipa O.A. Selection of control quality criteria when using single-connected and multi-connected technological process control systems. Mezhdunarodnyi tekhnikoekonomicheskii zhurnal = The International TechnicalEconomic Journal. 2012;(2):68-70. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Malyshkina M.V., Miroslavskaya M.V. Assessing the Quality of Management of Transformation Processes in Economic Systems. Economics and Management. 2020;26(9):952-956. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2020-9-952-956