Sustainable Regional Economic Development: Analysis and Management Methods

The presented study examines methods for analyzing and managing sustainable economic development of Russian regions and possible criteria for assessing and improving sustainability.

Aim. The study aims to provide a theoretical and empirical justification for the use of regional competitive attractiveness assessment to manage economic development and improve its sustainability.

Tasks. Based on the measurement and analysis of economic competitive attractiveness indicators and their mathematical treatment, the authors assess the sustainability of development of Russian regions in 2013–2017 and the causes of deviations from progressive growth.

Methods. This study proposes a mathematical tool for measuring the sustainability of Russian regions by assessing their competitive attractiveness and develops a typology of sustainability in the mathematical space of two variables.

Results. Methods for analyzing and managing the sustainability of economic development of Russian regions under the influence of political and economic challenges and risks are proposed. The level and dynamics of regional competitive attractiveness are taken as a criterion of sustainability of economic development. The authors provide methods and indicators for assessing economic competitive attractiveness and criteria for measuring the sustainability of development, which allow them to draw conclusions about the reaction of different regions to the challenges and risks of development in 2013–2017. The study proposes a management scheme for sustainable regional development with a focus on the comprehensive improvement of regional economic competitive attractiveness and potential ways to improve it, including training of municipal and regional managers in crisis management associated with economic and political challenges and risks.

Conclusions. Based on the proposed criterion of economic development sustainability and assessment of the competitive attractiveness of regions and their rankings, it is shown that in 2013–2017 45 out of 83 regions were developing sustainably; by 2017, 19 regions out of the 32 that suffered losses in the competitive attractiveness level and rankings in 2015–2016 have managed to restore the sustainability of economic development and their rankings. This study proves that regions with a high level of economic competitive attractiveness show increased sustainability of development.

1. Glaz’ev S. Prospects for the Russian economy in the context of global competition. Ekonomist. 2007;(5):3-16. (In Russ.).

2. Uskova T. V. Regional sustainability management. Vologda: RAS Institute of Socio-Economic Development of Territories; 2009. 355 p. (In Russ.).

3. Denison E. F. Why growth rates differ: Postwar experiences in nine Western countries. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 1967. 494 p. (Russ. ed.: Denison E. Issledovanie razlichiy v tempakh ekonomicheskogo rosta. Moscow: Progress; 1971. 645 p.).

4. Kuznetsov S. V., ed. Innovative socially oriented development of the regional economy: Methodology and research methods. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation; 2011. 308 p. (In Russ.).

5. Kotler Ph., Asplund Ch., Rein I., Haider D. Marketing places Europe: How to attract investments, industries, residents and visitors to cities, communities, regions and nations in Europe. London: Financial Times Management; 1999. 302 p. (Russ. ed.: Kotler Ph., Asplund Ch., Rein I., Haider D. Marketing mest: privlecheniye investitsiy, predpriyatiy, zhiteley i turistov v goroda, kommuny, regiony i strany Evropy. St. Petersburg: Stockholm School of Economics in St. Petersburg; 2005. 376 p.).

6. Tatarkin A. I. The formation of regions’ competitive advantages. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya = Region: Economics and Sociology. 2006;(1):141-154. (In Russ.).

7. Vazhenin S. G., Bersenev V. L., Vazhenina I. S., Tatarkin A. I. Territorial competition in the economic space. Ekaterinburg: Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of RAS; 2011. 540 p. (In Russ.).

8. Teterin N. Assessment of the socio-economic competitiveness of the region (on the example of the Kurgan region). Chinovnik. 2004;(4). (In Russ.).

9. Official exchange rate. URL: http://www.kurs-dollar-euro.ru (accessed on 03.11.2019). (In Russ.).

10. Weighted average annual oil price. URL: http://www.world.tuble.infoyekonomika/cena-na-neftmarket.ru (accessed on 03.11.2019). (In Russ.).

11. Three years of sanctions against Russia: Losses and gains. Russian news agency. March 18, 2017. URL: http://новости-россии.ru-an.info/новости/три-года-санкций-против-россии-потери-иприобретения/ (accessed on 03.11.2019). (In Russ.).

12. Prices per million British thermal units (MWT) for 1,000 m 3of gas. URL: https://bhom.ru/commodities/prirodnyi-gaz/ (accessed on 03.11.2019). (In Russ.).

13. Porter M. E. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press Publ.; 1998. 592 p. (Russ. ed.: Porter M. Konkurentnoe preimushchestvo: Kak dostich’ vysokogo rezul’tata i obespechit’ ego ustoychivost’. Moscow: Alpina Business Books; 2005. 715 p.).

14. Grinchel’ B. M., Nazarova E. A. Improving the innovative attractiveness of the regions to overcome the crisis. Innovatsii = Innovations. 2015;(6):91-97. (In Russ.).

15. Grinchel’ B. M., Nazarova E. A. The Research of influence of differences in the level of scientific and technological development of Russian regions on the economy and quality of life. Ekonomika Severo-Zapada: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya = Economy of the North-West: Issues and Prospects of Development. 2016;(1):49-67. (In Russ.).

16. Official website of the Federal State Statistics Service. URL: http://www.gks.ru/ (accessed on 15.12.2019). (In Russ.).