The impact of applying the Common Customs Tariff on the armenian export of Cut and Polished Gems to Russia
https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2019-11-33-41
Abstract
The presented study discusses the issues of applying the Common Customs Tariff (CCT) rates of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) on rough diamonds and the impact thereof on the exports of stones cut and polished inArmeniaand then exported toRussia.
Aim. The study aims to identify the possible strategies Armenian diamond cutting and polishing companies could adopt as a response to the application of the CCT rates on rough diamonds and how it would affect exports to various destinations, namely to Russia.
Tasks. The authors analyze the current state of the gems and jewelry sector and substantiate the need to either integrate it into the jewelry manufacturing sector or to apply various strategies to facilitate exports to either Russia or other destinations in the medium term in response to the application of the CCT rates.
Methods. This study uses general scientific methods of cognition, including analytical and methodological approaches and elements of forecasting. Possible strategies the Armenian diamond cutting and polishing companies could adopt in the medium term in response to the application of the EAEU CCT rates are determined using the analytical research method, forecasts in the context of the developments in the Armenian gem processing and jewelry market and global trends, statistical data on the imports and exports of cut and polished gems and jewelry for 2014–2018 published by the UN Comtrade Statistics.
Results. Statistics on the exports of processed diamonds from 2014 to 2018 highlights the issue associated with the loss of competitiveness suffered by Armenian companies (mainly in comparison with Indian diamond cutters). The major global trends in the diamond cutting and polishing business indicate that it could be virtually impossible for Armenian cutters and polishers to compete with Indian companies in the medium term if they do not comes to investing in new technology to achieve operational efficiency. For these companies, it is important not to lose the Russian market due to an increase in the tariff rate and concentrate on the processing of gems that are larger than 1 carat. Another strategy to avoid an increase in the customs tariff rates would depend on the Armenian government’s ability to negotiate with Russia in respect of direct imports of diamond stones from Russian manufactures. Two other options for Armenian cutters involve focusing on cutting and polishing of rubies, sapphires, emeralds, etc. or integrating into the jewelry sector either by being the primary supplier or by considering this business as a channel to sell processed diamond stones by setting up their own jewelry manufacturing companies.
Conclusions. With CCT going into effect in January 2021 and India’s dominant role in the diamond cutting and polishing business, Armenia needs to carefully consider all of the strategies the Armenian companies could adopt, as discussed above. As a member state of the EAEU, Armenia freely exports to Russia, however, further exports to Russia would depend on Armenia’s ability to ensure that cost-effective operations are in place, or to concentrate on the processing of precious gems rather than diamonds, or to switch to the manufacturing of jewelry items as a major export item.
Practical Implication. The findings of this study could be of interest to the Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Armenia and Business Armenia that could be used in elaborating the strategy for the development of Armenian gems and jewelry sector of the economy.
About the Authors
V. L. HarutyunyanArmenia
Vladimir L. Harutyunyan
Grigor Lusavorich Str. 15, Yerevan, Republic of Armenia, 0015
S. V. Dokholyan
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Dokholyan
Yаragskogo Str. 75, Makhachkala, Russian Federation, 367030
A. R. Makaryan
Armenia
Anna R. Makaryan
Grigor Lusavorich Str. 15, Yerevan, Republic of Armenia, 0015
References
1. Dreger C., Herzer D. A further examination of the export-led growth hypothesis. Empirical Economics. 2013;45(1):39-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00181-012-0602-4
2. Çetintaş H., Barişik S. Export, import and economic growth: The case of transition economies. Transition Studies Review. 2009;15(4):636-649. DOI: 10.1007/s11300-008-0043-0
3. Greenaway D., Morgan W., Wright P. Exports, export composition and growth. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development: An International and Comparative Review. 1999; 8(1):41-51, DOI: 10.1080/09638199900000004.
4. Dokholyan S. V., Sargsyan L. N. Is the export-oriented growth hypothesis valid for Armenia? Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management. 2019;(2):4-11. (In Russ.).
5. Armenia competitiveness assessment report, submitted to USAID/Yerevan, under Contract No. PCE-I-837-98-00016-00. Nathan Associates Inc. & J.E. Austin Associates Inc. June 2004. URL: https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADD292.pdf.
6. Hergnyan M., Makaryan A. The role of the diaspora in generating foreign direct investments in Armenia. Armenian Journal of Public Policy. 2007;2(2):259-294.
7. UN Comtrade Database. United Nations Statistics Division. URL: https://comtrade.un.org/ data/.
8. The Common Customs Tariff of the Eurasian Economic Union, approved by Decision No. 54 of the EEC Council dated July 16, 2012 (as amended by Decision No. 101 of the EEC Council of October 18, 2016). URL: http://www.eurasiancommission.org/ru/act/trade/catr/ett/Pages/default.aspx (In Russ.).
9. Annex 4 (List of goods and rates in respect of which, during the transitional period, the Republic of Armenia shall apply the import customs duties rates, other than the Common Customs Tariff rates of the Eurasian Economic Union) to the Treaty on the Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union of May 29, 2014 (adopted October 10, 2014). URL: https://docs.eaeunion.org/docs/en-us/0017354/itia_11102014_doc.pdf
10. Trošt M., Bojnec Š. Export-led growth: The case of the Slovenian and Estonian economies. PostCommunist Economies. 2016;28(3):373-383. DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2016.1184425
11. Hye Q. M. A., Wizarat S., Lau W.-Y. Trade-led growth hypothesis: An empirical analysis of South Asian countries. Economic Modelling. 2013;35:654-660. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2013. 07.040.
12. Kristjanpoller W. R., Olson J. E. Economic growth in Latin American countries: Is it based on export-led or import-led growth? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. 2014;50(sup. 1):6-20. DOI: 10.2753/REE1540-496x5001S101
13. Tang C. F., Lai Y. W., Ozturk I. How stable is the export-led growth hypothesis? Evidence from Asia’s Four Little Dragons. Economic Modelling. 2015;44:229-235. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2014. 09.022
14. Ee C. Y. Export-led growth hypothesis: Empirical evidence from selected sub-Saharan African countries. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2016;35:232-240. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00029-0.
15. Sağlam Y., Egeli H. A. A comparison of domestic demand and export-led growth strategies for European transition economies. Foreign Trade Review. 2018;53(3):156-173. DOI: 10.1177/ 0015732517734755.
16. Rani R., Kumar N. Is there an exportor import-led growth in BRICS countries? An empirical investigation. Jindal Journal of Business Research. 2018;7(1):13-23. DOI: 10.1177/2278682118761748.
17. Shoghakn diamond cutting company to open training center. ARKA News Agency. Nov. 25, 2016. URL: http://arka.am/en/news/business/shoghakn_diamond_cutting_company_to_open_training_center/.
18. Further growth recorded in Armenian diamond Industry. Aazatutyun Radio. Aug. 9, 2017. URL: https://www.azatutyun.am/a/28667420.html.
19. Gziryan A. Armenia’s Kotayk province eyes becoming major diamond industry center. Armenpress. March 6, 2019. URL: https://armenpress.am/eng/news/966487.html.
20. The global diamond industry 2015: Growth perspectives amid short-term challenges. Boston, MA: Bain & Company, Inc.; 2015. 40 p. URL: https://www.awdc.be/sites/awdc2016/ficuments/BAIN%202015%20The%20Global%20Diamond%20Report%202015%20Growth%20perspectives%20amid%20short-term%20challenges.pdf.
21. The global diamond industry 2016: The enduring allure of timeless gems. Boston, MA: Bain & Company, Inc.; 2016. 46 p. URL: https://www.bain.com/contentassets/9b90201a6a764af88ad06f21cca3f273/bain_diamond_report_2016.pdf.
22. The global diamond industry 2017: The enduring story in a changing world. Boston, MA: Bain & Company, Inc.; 2017. 40 p. URL: https://www.awdc.be/sites/awdc2016/ficuments/The%20Global%20Diamond%20Industry%202017%20-%20The%20enduring%20story%20in%20a%20changing%20world.pdf.
23. The global diamond industry 2018: A resilient industry shines through. Boston, MA: Bain & Company, Inc.; 2018. 43 p. URL: https://www.bain.com/contentassets/a53a9fa8bf5247a3b7bb0b10561510c2/bain_diamond_report_2018.pdf.
24. Dubai’s diamond gateway: Certified for security, quality and responsible stewardship. DMCC. 2019. URL:https://www.dmcc.ae/gateway-to-trade/commodities/diamonds.
Review
For citations:
Harutyunyan V.L., Dokholyan S.V., Makaryan A.R. The impact of applying the Common Customs Tariff on the armenian export of Cut and Polished Gems to Russia. Economics and Management. 2019;(11):33-41. https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2019-11-33-41