Preview

Economics and Management

Advanced search

Distance Learning in Higher Education: Technological Aspect

https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2019-8-95-102

Abstract

The  presented study analyzes the  development of distance higher education. Distance learning, previously available via  correspondence between students and  teachers, has  undergone a radical transformation into  online education  (e-learning),  which uses   learning management  systems  as  well  as  other online and  digital  tools.

Aim. The  study aims  to structure the  major elements of  directions for the  development of  distance learning in  Russian and  foreign higher educational institutions.

Tasks. The  author examines the  existing types of distance learning and  their effects on student activity, exploring the   essence of  requirements  for the   successful implementation  of  distance  learning systems.

Methods. This  study uses  analytical methods and  methods for structuring and  systematizing information. The  author makes reference to  the  works of  other researchers on  distance  learning and  e-learning, uses  legal information and  materials  from Internet  sources.

Results.  Application of  information and   communication technologies  (ICT)  in  education has  great potential. It is  necessary to  thoroughly analyze technological  and  digital  systems  that ensure the  efficiency distance  learning. There are many platforms, both open  and  private,  for distance  learning. Conclusions. Realization of  innovative potential will  improve the  level  of  higher education in  Russia and   its prestige in  the   global market, while   implementation  of  innovative research programs will mitigate  the  problem of  brain drain.

About the Author

S. G. Keyyan
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Sarkis G.  Keyyan.

Leninskie gory  1, bldg.  46,  Moscow, Russian  Federation, 119991.



References

1. Sun P.-С., Tsai R., Finger G., Chen Y.-Y., Yeh D. What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 2008, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1183−1202. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007.

2. O’Connell J. Networked participatory online learning design and challenges for academic integrity in higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2016, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1−15. DOI: 10.1007/s40979-016-0009-7.

3. Vlasova E. Z. Elektronnoe obuchenie v sovremennom vuze: problemy, perspektivy i opyt ispol’zovaniya [E-learning in a modern university: problems, prospects and experience of use]. Vestnik Gertsenovskogo universiteta, 2014, no. 1, pp. 43−49.

4. Gros B., García-Peñalvo F. J. Future trends in the design strategies and technological affordances of e-learning. In: Spector M., Lockee B. B., Childress M. D., eds. Learning, design and technology: An international compendium of theory, research, practice and policy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 1−23.

5. On education in the Russian Federation. Federal law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_140174/. Accessed 29.05.2019. (in Russ.).

6. Anderson T., Dron J. Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2011, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 80−97. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890.

7. Lee M. J., McLoughlin C., Chan A. Talk the talk: Learner-generated podcasts as catalysts for knowledge creation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2008, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 501−521. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00746.x.

8. Brown J. S. Learning, working and playing in the digital age. In: Conference on Higher Education of the American Association for Higher Education (Washington, DC, March 20-23, 1999). 1999. Available at: https://serendipstudio.org/sci_edu/seelybrown/seelybrown.html. Accessed 05.06.2019.

9. O’Neill E., Stevens N. T., Clarke E., Cox P., O’Malley B., Humphreys H. Use of e-learning to enhance medical students’ understanding and knowledge of healthcare-associated infection prevention and control. Journal of Hospital Infection, 2011, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 368−370. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.08.008.

10. Martínez Mateo J., Pérez del Rey D., Muñoz-Hernández S. Student motivation and cross-curricular development through e-learning applied to cooperation. In: IEEE EDUCON 2010 Conference: The Future of Global Learning Engineering Education (Madrid, April 14-16, 2010). N.Y.: IEEE, 2010, pp. 913−920. DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON.2010.5492481.

11. Keramati A., Afshari-Mofrad M., Kamrani A. The role of readiness factors in e-learning outcomes: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 2011, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 1919−1929. DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.005.

12. Thomas D., Brown J. S. A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. Lexington: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2011. 137 p.

13. Kim K.-J., Frick T. W. Changes in student motivation during online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2011, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1−23. DOI: 10.2190/EC.44.1.a.

14. Bhuasiri W., Xaymoungkhoun O., Zo H., Rho J. J., Ciganek A. P. Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 2012, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 843−855. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.010.

15. Harandi S. R. Effects of e-learning on students’ motivation. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 181, pp. 423−430. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.905.

16. Molchanov I. N. Formirovanie i otsenka potentsiala sfery obrazovaniya v sovremennoy Rossii [Formation and assessment of the potential of the education sector in modern Russia]. Gumanitarnye i sotsial'nye nauki, 2014, no. 2, pp. 406−410.

17. Keller J., Suzuki K. Learner motivation and e-learning design: A multinationally validated process. Journal of Educational Media, 2004, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 229−239. DOI: 10.1080/1358165042000283084.

18. Garavan T. N., Carbery R., O’Malley G., O’Donnell D. Understanding participation in e-learning in organizations: A large scale empirical study of employees. International Journal of Training and Development, 2010, vol. 14, no 3, pp. 155−168. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2419.2010.00349.x.

19. Bolgov R., Dunaeva Y. University in the global knowledge society: From digital idea to distance learning practice. In: Chugunov A. V., Bolgov R., Kabanov Y., Kampis G., Wimmer M., eds. 1st Int. conf. on digital transformation and global society (DTGS) (St. Petersburg, 22-24 June, 2016). Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 404−410. (Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 674). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-49700-6_40.

20. On the Federal targeted program for the development of education for 2016-2020. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of May 23, 2015 No. 497. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/420276588. Accessed 21.06.2019. (in Russ.).

21. Molchanov I. N., Molchanova N. P. Finansovye osnovy formirovaniya innovatsionnogo potentsiala [Financial fundamentals for developing the innovation potential]. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta, 2016, vol. 20, no. 4 (94), pp. 56−65.

22. Dunaeva Yu. Informatsionnye tekhnologii kak instrumenty universitetskogo obrazovaniya [Information technologies as instruments of university education]. Regional’nye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki, 2016, no. 2 (64), pp. 103−108.

23. Magarshak Yu. The triangle of civilization. Russian academic science needs fundamental changes. Vremya novostey, 2007, no. 54. Available at: http://www.vremya.ru/2007/54/4/174954.html. Accessed 21.06.2019. (in Russ.).

24. Wierzbicki A. P., Nakamori Y., eds. Creative environments: Issues of creativity support for the knowledge civilization age. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2007, pp. 445−467. (Studies in Computational Intelligence. Vol. 59).

25. Duffin E. E-learning and digital education – Statistics & facts. 2019. Available at: https://www. statista.com/topics/3115/e-learning-and-digital-education/.Accessed 20.07.2019.

26. Chernev B. 21 Astonishing e-learning statistics for 2019. Techjury. 2019. Available at: https://techjury.net/stats-about/elearning/. Accessed 20.07.2019.

27. Analysis of the Russian distance learning market: Results of 2018, forecast up to 2021. RBC. May 28, 2019. Available at: https://marketing.rbc.ru/articles/10886/. Accessed 20.07.2019. (in Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Keyyan S.G. Distance Learning in Higher Education: Technological Aspect. Economics and Management. 2019;(8):95-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2019-8-95-102

Views: 315


ISSN 1998-1627 (Print)