Specific Aspects of Structural Organization of Conceptual Management as a Component of Social Management

The present study examines the existing approaches to the interpretation of the nature of conceptual power, substantiates the methodology of a structural organization of conceptual management, and develops its model. Aim. The study aims to substantiate the structural organization of a conceptual management model. Tasks. The existing approaches to the interpretation of the nature of conceptual power are examined. The methodology of a structural organization within a conceptual management model is substantiated. A conceptual management model is developed, which is based on the interrelation and interdependence of the management concept, national ideology, progressive future concept, conceptual operation process, and conceptual operation matrix. Methods. This study substantiates the methodology of structural organization of a conceptual management model, which includes substantiation of its structural elements - conceptual and ideological power, managerial, national, and social ideology, the interaction of which lies at the heart of implementation of conceptual management - the management concept, national ideology, progressive future concept, conceptual operational process, conceptual operations matrix, and creates optimal conditions for achieving a dual result: formation of a rational social behavior paradigm and a framework that generates beneficial social activity. Results. A methodology of structural organization of a social lifestyle model based on the interaction of conceptual and ideological power, managerial, national, and social ideology. This methodology makes it possible to substantiate the structural organization of a conceptual management model, which includes the management concept, national ideology, progressive future concept, conceptual operational process, conceptual operations matrix aimed at the formation of a rational social behavior paradigm and a framework that generates beneficial social activity. The process of formation of rational social behavior and beneficial social activity is represented as a closed system. The driving force behind all processes within that cycle is national ideology, which affects the results of implementation of a progressive future concept. Conclusion. Examination of the existing interpretations of the nature of conceptual power makes it possible to substantiate the methodology of structural organization of a conceptual management model and to develop a corresponding model that functions through interaction between the managerial concept, a national ideology, a progressive future concept, a conceptual operation process, and a conceptual operation matrix, all of which facilitate the formation of a rational social behavior paradigm and a framework that generates beneficial social activity.

management concept, national ideology, progressive future concept, conceptual operation process, conceptual operation matrix, conceptual environment, social behavioral imperative, conceptual power, концепция управления, официальная идеология, концепция прогрессивного будущего, процесс концептуального оперирования, матрица концептуального оперирования, концептуальная среда, императив социального поведения, концептуальная власть

1. Григоренко Д. Е. Либерализм как теория и концепция управления обществом // Вестник Сибирского государственного аэрокосмического университета им. академика М. Ф. Решетнева. 2006. № 4 (11). С. 112-116.

2. Солонько И. В. Феномен концептуальной власти в контексте цивилизационных процессов // Известия Международной академии аграрного образования. 2012. Т. 3, № 15. С. 36-40.

3. Свистунов Д. Е. Национальная безопасность в Российской Федерации: теоретико-правовое исследование // Вестник Марийского государственного университета. Сер.: Исторические науки. Юридические науки. 2017. Т. 3, № 1 (9). С. 78-82.

4. Горшенков Г. Н. Концептуальная власть и антикоррупционное движение в стране // Актуальные проблемы экономики и права. 2013. № 2 (26). С. 225-232.

5. Сулимин А. Н. Новые формы управления в глобальной информационной среде и проблемы национальной безопасности РФ // Вопросы управления. 2015. № 4 (35). С. 56-60.

6. Грецкая О. С. Концепция «золотого миллиарда» в международных отношениях // Сибирский торгово-экономический журнал. 2008. № 7. С. 73-75.

7. Бек У. Что такое глобализация? Ошибки глобализма - ответы на глобализацию / пер. с нем. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2001. 304 с.

8. Тоффлер О. Проблемы власти на пороге XXI века // Свободная мысль. 1992. № 2. С. 113-120.

9. Парсонс Т. Система современных обществ / пер. с англ. Л. А. Седова, А. Д. Ковалева; под ред. М. С. Ковалевой. М.: Аспект Пресс, 1998. 270 с.