Managing technological support for national food security based on a typology of regions
https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2025-11-1409-1425
Abstract
Aim. The work aimed to develop a scientifically based, differentiated approach to regulating technological development processes in Russia’s agro-industrial complex (AIC), taking into account the classification of regions based on their role in the development and use of advanced production technologies (APT) to ensure national food security.
Objectives. The work seeks to verify the hypothesis of the structural heterogeneity of Russian regions, manifested in the division between technology-developing regions and technology-using regions; to conduct a cluster analysis and identify typological groups of regions based on a set of indicators, such as the activity of APT use, level of development, investment attractiveness, and agricultural efficiency; to formulate recommendations for stimulating the development and implementation of technologies, as well as for constructing regional cooperation to achieve the goals of AIC technological independence.
Methods. The methodology is based on a cluster analysis conducted to classify the Russian regions into groups based on their role in technological support of food security. A set of indicators, based on Rosstat data, was applied. This set of indicators was classified into three groups, namely technological activity (the number of advanced technologies developed and used for the AIC), the level of agricultural development (the share of agriculture in the region’s Gross Regional Product and the share of people employed in agriculture), and the investment attractiveness and efficiency of agriculture (the share of investments in fixed capital of the field, the proportion of highly productive jobs in agriculture, and the profitability of the products sold in the industry).
Results. A tool was developed for classifying regions based on their role in creating the technological foundation for food security. Four clusters were identified, each characterized by a specific combination of technological potential and level of agricultural development. This typology was the basis for developing differentiated recommendations for each group of regions.
Conclusions. Russian regions are classified into “developers” (research centers of the country) and “users” (agricultural regions) of agro-industrial technologies. A differentiated approach to developing incentives for regions to achieve technological independence in the food sector involves classifying entities based on their technology use activity and the level of development of agriculture as a key sector for achieving national food security goals. Regions leading in technology development and implementation function as drivers of technological transformation and hubs for cooperation. Regions with high agricultural potential require intensified technology development and implementation processes through local research centers. Regions with low technology adoption require incentives and targeted support for their implementation. Agricultural regions with uneven levels of technology adoption activity are encouraged to adopt the experience of successful regions and replicate best practices. The primary recommendation is to establish cooperation between developer and user regions through technology platforms and specialized technology implementation centers. The resulting tools for developing targeted regional policies allow for the most effective unlocking of the specific potential of each region type to achieve the national goal of technological ensuring of food security.
Keywords
About the Author
E. V. LobkovaRussian Federation
Elena V. Lobkova, PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Social and Economic Planning of the Institute of Economics, Public Administration and Finance
79 Svobodny Ave., Krasnoyarsk 660041
Competing Interests:
the author declares no conflict of interest related to the publication of this article.
References
1. Kulikov I.M., Minakov I.A. Impact of technical and technological modernization and special measures in addressing food security. Nexo Revista Científica. 2023;36(2):155-164. https:// doi.org/10.5377/nexo.v36i02.16055
2. Anisimov A.P., Matytsin D.E. Ensuring food security as a legal and technological problem. In: Inshakova A.O., Frolova E.E., eds. Smart technologies for the digitisation of industry: Entrepreneurial environment. Singapore: Springer; 2022:337-352. (Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. Vol. 352). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4621-8_28
3. Tian J., Bryksa B.C., Yada R.Y. Feeding the world into the future – food and nutrition security: The role of food science and technology. Frontiers in Life Science. 2016;9(3): 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/21553769.2016.1174958
4. McCarthy U., Uysal I., Badia-Melis R., et al. Global food security – issues, challenges and technological solutions. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2018;77(11-20). https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.05.002
5. Mok W.K., Tan Y.X., Chen W.N. Technology innovations for food security in Singapore: A case study of future food systems for an increasingly natural resource-scarce world. Trends Food Science and Technologies. 2020;102:155-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.06.013
6. Ermakova Zh.A. Financial support for technological development of economic sectors. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Vestnik of Samara University. Economics and Management. 2023;14(3):59-70. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0461-2023-14-3-59-70
7. Petukhova M.S., Koval S.V. Forecast of the need for highly qualified personnel in the agricultural sector of the Novosibirsk region in the conditions of a new technological structure. Mezhdunarodnyi sel’skokhozyaistvennyi zhurnal = International Agricultural Journal. 2022;(1):53-56. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.55186/25876740_2022_65_1_53
8. Premanandh J. Factors affecting food security and contribution of modern technologies in food sustainability. Journal of the Sciences of Food and Agriculture. 2011;91(15):2707-2714. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4666
9. Weisenfeld P., Wetterberg A. Technological advances to improve food security: Addressing challenges to adoption. RTI Press Publication. 2015;(RB-0011-1510). https://doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2015.rb.0011.1510
10. Seitov S.K. Innovative development of Russian agriculture: Current state and supporting measures. Izvestiya Timiryazevskoi sel’skokhozyaistvennoi akademii = Izvestiya of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. 2023;(5):134-150. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342Х-2023-5-134-150
11. Barcho M.Kh., Arakelyan A.A., Kvasova A.A., Kozlenko E.I. Innovative development of agriculture in the Krasnodar territory as a factor in ensuring food security. Estestvennogumanitarnye issledovaniya = Natural Humanitarian Studies. 2024;(1):27-31. (In Russ.).
12. Sutormina E.S. Methodological approaches to the study of the infrastructure of innovative activity of agricultural organizations. Moskovskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal = Moscow Economic Journal. 2021;(12):714-724. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2413-046Х-2021-10768
13. Kurdyumov A.V., Korolev A.V. Innovative technologies in agriculture as a factor in ensuring food safety. International Agricultural Journal. 2020;63(6):26. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2588-0209-2020-10251
14. Bing W. Agriculture innovative modernization as a basis for international scientific research of Heilongjiang (China) and territories of the Russian Far East. Territoriya novykh vozmozhnostei. Vestnik Vladivostokskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i servisa = Territory of New Opportunities. Bulletin of the Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service. 2022;14(3):20-28. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24866/VVSU/2073-3984/2022-3/020-028
15. Sayfetdinov A.R. Economic content and features of determining the priorities of the sovereign innovative development of agriculture. Mezhdunarodnyi sel’skokhozyaistvennyi zhurnal = International Agricultural Journal. 2025;68(2):203-208. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.55186/25876740_2025_68_2_203
16. Rykova I.N., Shkodinsky S.V., Yuryeva A.A. Comparative analysis of technical and technological equipment of agricultural sectors in the Russian Federation. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, Taxes & Law. 2019;12(4):39-49. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X‑2019-12-4-39-49
17. Iovlev G.A., Goldina I.I. On the problems of the formation of technical and technological sovereignty in agriculture of the Russian Federation. Izvestiya Timiryazevskoi sel’skokhozyaistvennoi akademii = Izvestiya of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. 2025;(1):201-215. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2025-1-201-215
18. Chekavinsky A.N. STP acceleration is a strategic objective of agricultural development in the region. Problemy razvitiya territorii = Problems of Territory’s Development. 2011;(2): 25-33. (In Russ.).
19. Samygin D.Yu., Ivanov A.A. Territorial location and strategic development of the agrifood sector. Izvestiya Timiryazevskoi sel’skokhozyaistvennoi akademii = Izvestiya of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. 2023;(5):115-133. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2023-5-115-133
20. Wang X., Du R., Cai H., et al. Assessing the impacts of technological change on food security and climate change mitigation in China’s agriculture and land-use sectors. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2024;107:107550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107550
21. Dietrich J.P., Schmitz C., Lotze-Campen H., Popp A., Müller C. Forecasting technological change in agriculture – an endogenous implementation in a global land use model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2014;81:236-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.02.003
22. Cherkasova O.V., Strokov A.S., Tsvetnov E.V., et al. Food security assessment issues in the Russian Federation. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 17. Pochvovedenie = Moscow University Bulletin. Series 17: Soil Science. 2023;78(2):117-127. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0137-0944-17-2023-78-2-117-127
23. Korobeynikova D.M., Bulgarov M.A. Production infrastructure as a factor in agricultural development. Innovatsionnaya ekonomika: informatsiya, analitika, prognozy = Innovative Economy: Information, Analytics, Forecasts. 2025;(3):18-23. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.47576/2949-1894.2025.3.3.002
24. Gurnovich T.G., Sukhorukova N.A., Titova T.A., Tkacheva D.V. Material and technical base of agricultural production in the system of state planning and regulation. Vestnik Akademii znanii = Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge. 2021;(47):120-124. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2304-6139-2021-6-120-124
25. Vertakova Yu.V., Kumratova A.M., Plotnikov V.A. Modeling of the state support results for agricultural development in Russia’s macroregions. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2023;(5):76-81. (In Russ.).
26. Rasskazov A.N. Implementation of the state program for the development of agriculture and the main directions of livestock development. Vestnik Vserossiiskogo nauchnoissledovatel’skogo instituta mekhanizatsii zhivotnovodstva. 2019;(3):152-156. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Lobkova E.V. Managing technological support for national food security based on a typology of regions. Economics and Management. 2025;31(11):1409-1425. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2025-11-1409-1425















