Preview

Economics and Management

Advanced search

The impact of financial system indicators on economic growth in China, India and a number of other countries

https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2025-3-372-384

Abstract

   Aim. The work is aimed to study the relationship between economic growth rates and financial system indicators in China, India, the remaining original BRICS countries, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), a number of Western countries, as well as to calculate threshold values and the structure of the financial system that induces the economic growth.

   Objectives. In order to achieve this goal, it is necessary to collect and calculate a data panel from a number of countries and regions containing information on their economic growth rates and the state of their financial systems (the latter are represented by indicators of the stock market and the banking system); analyze the data through visual analysis, in particular, construct scatter diagrams and frequency histograms; conduct statistical analysis, that is, calculate correlation coefficients, construct clusters and conduct their meta-analysis; formulate a conclusion on the optimal combination and level of stock market factors, the banking system that contributes to economic growth.

   Methods. The primary data analysis was performed using scatter diagram matrices and frequency histograms. A correlation analysis was performed to summarize the main characteristics of the data panel. The main research method was K-means clustering and meta-analysis of the results.

   Results. A data panel was compiled, supplemented and calculated, to include 17 countries (Russia, Brazil, Germany, Hong Kong, Israel, India, Indonesia, China, Malaysia, Singapore, USA, Thailand, Turkey, the Philippines, South Africa, South Korea, and Japan), ten economic variables (four variables characterizing banking systems, that is, the relative extent of bank deposits, broad money supply, central bank assets and internal loans to the private sector; four variables characterizing the securities market, in particular, stock price volatility, stock market turnover, the size of stock and stock market trading volume to gross domestic product (GDP); two variables characterizing economic growth, that is, the annual growth rate of GDP per capita (purchasing power par, PPP, 2021), and the weighted average annual growth rate of GDP per capita (PPP, 2021) from 1996 to 2020. This panel was used to conduct a cluster analysis, and based on its metadata, reasonable conclusions were made.

   Conclusions. The cluster meta-analysis showed that the maximum positive effect of the financial system on the economy is achieved when the relative size of deposits and loans in the economy is at the GDP level, and downward or upward deviations from this level induce a slowdown in the economy. A similar effect is noted when central bank assets exceed 10 % of GDP. The stock market turnover should be greater than 100 %, and no positive effect on the economy is registered before this threshold is exceeded, while stock market volatility as a whole does not affect economic growth. It was established that the negative effect of exceeding the threshold value of the relative size of loans is significantly reduced, provided that the stock market turnover is in the optimal range.

About the Author

B. D. Klyukin
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Boris D. Klyukin, postgraduate student

119234; 1 Leninskie Gory; Moscow


Competing Interests:

The author declares no conflict of interest related to the publication of this article



References

1. Gözgör G., Gözgör K. The relationship between domestic credit and income: Evidence from Latin America // Applied Econometrics and International Development. 2013. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 89–98.

2. Prochniak M., Wasiak K. The impact of the financial system on economic growth in the context of the global crisis: Empirical evidence for the EU and OECD countries // Empirica. 2017. Vol. 44. No. 2. P. 295–337. DOI: 10.1007/s10663-016-9323-9

3. Kacho A. A., Dahmardeh N. The effects of financial development and institutional quality on economic growth with the dynamic panel data generalized moment method: Evidence from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries // International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues. 2017. Vol. 7. No. 3. P. 461–467. URL: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/4728/pdf (дата обращения: 07. 01. 2025).

4. Inoue T., Hamori S. Financial inclusion and economic growth: Is banking breadth important for economic growth? / T. Inoue, S. Hamori. Financial inclusion, remittance inflows, and poverty reduction in developing countries: Evidence from empirical analyses. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte, 2019. P. 1–16. DOI: 10.1142/9789813279094_0001

5. Le Q., Ho H., Vu T. Financial depth and economic growth: Empirical evidence from ASEAN+3 countries // Management Science Letters. 2019. Vol. 9. No. 6. P. 851–864. DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2019.3.003

6. Bekele D. T., Degu A. A. The effect of financial sector development on economic growth of selected sub-Saharan Africa countries // International Journal of Finance & Economics. 2023. Vol. 28. No. 3. P. 2834–2842. DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.2566

7. Öncel A., Saidmurodov S., Kutlar A. Financial development, export and economic growth: Panel data evidence from Commonwealth of Independent States // The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development. 2024. Vol. 33. No. 1. P. 29–56. DOI: 10.1080/09638199.2022.2164045

8. Law S. H., Singh N. Does too much finance harm economic growth? // Journal of Banking & Finance. 2014. Vol. 41. P. 36–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.020

9. Ho S.-H., Saadaoui J. Bank credit and economic growth: A dynamic threshold panel model for ASEAN countries // International Economics. 2022. Vol. 170. P. 115–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.inteco.2022.03.001

10. Global financial development database // World Bank Group. 2022. URL: https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/gfdr/data/global-financial-development-database (дата обращения: 30. 05. 2024).

11. World development indicators // World Bank Group. 2024. URL: https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search/dataset/0037712/World-Development-Indicators (дата обращения: 28. 06. 2024).

12. Boubakari A., Jin D. The role of stock market development in economic growth: Evidence from some Euronext countries // International Journal of Financial Research. 2010. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 14–20. DOI: 10.5430/ijfr.v1n1p14

13. Zhou M., Shang Y. An empirical analysis of the relationship between China’s economic growth and the stock market // Proceedings of the 2018 International conference on economy, management and entrepreneurship (ICOEME 2018). Dordrecht: Atlantis Press, 2018. P. 218–221. (Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research). DOI: 10.2991/icoeme-18.2018.44

14. Srinivasan P., Karthigai P. Stock market development and economic growth in India: An empirical analysis // International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies. 2014. Vol. 3. No. 3. P. 30–46. DOI: 10.20525/.v3i3.187


Review

For citations:


Klyukin B.D. The impact of financial system indicators on economic growth in China, India and a number of other countries. Economics and Management. 2025;31(3):372-384. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2025-3-372-384

Views: 152


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-1627 (Print)