Artificial intelligence-based decision support systems: Integration, adaptation, and performance evaluation
https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2024-12-1521-1534
Abstract
Aim. The work aimed to conduct a comprehensive analysis of decision support systems (DSS) based on artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, with an emphasis on their integration into business processes and performance evaluation.
Objectives. The work seeks to study the main stages of AI-based DSS development, to determine key performance indicators for assessing their financial, operational, and strategic impact, to select the main challenges in such implementations and the long-term effects of the systems, as well as to formulate recommendations for improving their interpretability and adaptability.
Methods. The study employed methods of system analysis, generalization of practical experience, and research. The article considers modern trends in the use of AI, successful cases from the practice of large companies (JPMorgan Chase, General Electric, Amazon), and the concept of the J-curve productivity for analyzing long-term effects.
Results. The integration of AI into DSS provides the best potential for increasing work efficiency, reducing costs, and improving the quality of management decisions. A comprehensive efficiency assessment model has been developed, which includes both quantitative and qualitative indicators.
Conclusions. AI-based DSS can be used not only to increase the accuracy and rate of management decisions, but also to optimize the resource utilization and adapt to a fast-paced market environment. However, successful integration of such systems requires solving a number of problems, including improvement of data quality, enhancement of the interpretability of algorithms, and adapting the personnel to new technologies. Hybrid models that combine AI capabilities and cognitive methods open up a promising direction capable of improving the efficiency and adaptability of DSS under conditions of uncertainty. The implementation of the proposed approaches leads to increased competitiveness and sustainability of companies.
About the Authors
S. V. Savin
LLC “Rezalt Region”; Southern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergei V. Savin, General Director; postgraduate student
82/1 Orbitalnaya st., Rostov-on-Don 344114
105/42 Bolshaya Sadovaya st., Rostov-on-Don 344022
A. D. Murzin
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anton D. Murzin, D.Sc. in Engineering, PhD in Economics,
Associate Professor, Professor at the Department of Management of Spatial and Economic Systems Development, Faculty of Management
105/42 Bolshaya Sadovaya st., Rostov-on-Don 344022
Researcher ID: F-6037-2014
Scopus Author ID: 56592239800
References
1. Gartner top 10 strategic technology trends for 2024. Gartner. 2024. URL: https://www.gartner.com/en/articles/gartner-top-10-strategic-technology-trends-for-2024 (accessed on 11.09.2024).
2. Brynjolfsson E., Rock D., Syverson C. The productivity J-curve: How intangibles complement general purpose technologies. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics. 2021;13(1):333-372. DOI: 10.1257/mac.20180386
3. The state of AI in early 2024: Gen AI adoption spikes and starts to generate value. McKinsey & Company. May 30, 2023. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai (accessed on 12.09.2024).
4. Oppioli M., Sousa M.J., Sousa M., de Nuccio E. The role of artificial intelligence for management decision: A structured literature review. Management Decision. 2023. DOI: 10.1108/MD-08-2023-1331
5. Duan Y., Edwards J.S., Dwivedi Y.K. Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data — evolution, challenges and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management. 2019;48:63-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021
6. Barredo Arrieta A., Díaz-Rodríguez N., Del Ser J., et al. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion. 2020;58:82-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012
7. Artificial intelligence in Russia in 2023: Trends and prospects. ICT.Moscow. 2023. URL: https://ict.moscow/projects/ai/research/iskusstvennyi-intellekt-v-rossii-v-2023-godu-trendy-i-perspektivy/ (accessed on 12.09.2024). (In Russ.).
8. Floridi L., Cowls J., Beltrametti M., et al. AI4People — An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines. 2018;28(4):689-707. DOI: 10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
9. Benbya H., Pachidi S., Jarvenpaa S.L. Special issue editorial: Artificial intelligence in organizations: Implications for information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2021;22(2):282-303. DOI: 10.17705/1jais.00662
10. Wamba S.F., Bawack R.E., Guthrie C., Queiroz M.M., Carillo K.D.A. Are we preparing for a good AI society? A bibliometric review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021;164:120482. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120482
11. Stoykova S., Shakev N. Artificial intelligence for management information systems: Opportunities, challenges and future directions. Algorithms. 2023;16(8):357. DOI: 10.3390/a16080357
12. Taherdoost H. Deep learning and neural networks: Decision-making implications. Symmetry. 2023;15(9):1723. DOI: 10.3390/sym15091723
13. Dias W.P.S., Weerasinghe R.L.D. Artificial neural networks for construction bid decisions. Civil Engineering Systems. 1996;13(3):239-253. DOI: 10.1080/02630259608970200
14. Sadeghian R., Sadeghian M.R. A decision support system based on artificial neural network and fuzzy analytic network process for selection of machine tools in a flexible manufacturing system. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2016;82(9):1795-1803. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-7440-4
15. He X., Zhao K., Chu X. AutoML: A survey of the state-of-the-art. Knowledge-Based Systems. 2021;212:106622. DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106622
16. Zöller M.-A., Huber M.F. Benchmark and survey of automated machine learning frameworks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 2021;70:409-472. DOI: 10.1613/jair.1.11854
17. Artificial intelligence in Russia — 2023: trends and prospects. Yakov and Partners. URL: https://yakovpartners.ru/publications/ai-future/ (accessed on 12.09.2024). (In Russ.).
18. Smagin V.S. Industrial Internet — dreams come true. ISUP. Informatizatsiya i sistemy upravleniya v promyshlennosti = ISUP Magazine. Informatization and Management Systems in Industry. 2016;(5):61-63. URL: https://isup.ru/upload/pdf-zhurnala/2018%20i%20dalee/2016/5/060_063_Advantek%20inzheniring.pdf (accessed on 20.09.2024). (In Russ.).
19. Application of artificial intelligence in logistics. ITOB. Jun. 18, 2024. URL: https://itob.ru/blog/primenenie-iskusstvennogo-intellekta-v-logistike/ (accessed on 20.09.2024). (In Russ.).
20. Because AI is only half the answer. Digital Data Design Institute at Harvard. URL: https://d3.harvard.edu/ (accessed 0n 20.09.2024).
21. JPMorgan reduced lawyers’ hours by 360,000 annually by automating loan agreement analysis with machine learning software COIN. Best Practice AI. URL: https://www.best-practice.ai/ai-case-study-best-practice/jpmorgan_reduced_lawyers’_hours_by_360%2C000_annually_by_automating_loan_agreement_analysis_with_machine_learning_software_coin (accessed on 20.09.2024).
22. Bromels J. 3 ways GE’s Predix is revolutionizing customers’ operations. Fox Business. URL: https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/3-ways-ges-predix-is-revolutionizing-customers-operations (accessed on 20.09.2024).
23. Afzal F., Yunfei S., Nazir M., Bhatti S.M. A review of artificial intelligence based risk assessment methods for capturing complexity-risk interdependencies. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. 2021;14(2):300-328. DOI: 10.1108/ijmpb-02-2019-0047
24. Azeez M., Akpinar M., Ayar K. A hybrid prediction approach using multiple linear regression and decision trees. In: 2023 9th Int. conf. on information technology trends (Dubai, May 24-25, 2023). New York, NY: IEEE; 2023:61-66. DOI: 10.1109/ITT59889.2023.10184242
25. Weiser A.-K., Krogh G. von. Artificial intelligence and radical uncertainty. European Management Review. 2023;20(4):711-717. DOI: 10.1111/emre.12630
Review
For citations:
Savin S.V., Murzin A.D. Artificial intelligence-based decision support systems: Integration, adaptation, and performance evaluation. Economics and Management. 2024;30(12):1521-1534. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2024-12-1521-1534
Views:
107
