Co-evolutionary-convergent potential of ESG 5.0 as a driver of industrial growth of the Russian economy in a multipolar world

   Aim. To study the coevolutionary-convergent potential formed by synergetic integration of Industry 5.0 technologies and ESG principles, as well as to conceptualize this potential as a driver of industrial growth of the Russian economy in a multipolar world.

   Objectives. Clarification of the concept of “co-evolutionary-convergent potential” and its implementation in relation to ESG-development version 5.0 in a multipolar world; identification of trends and tendencies in the formation of co-evolutionary-convergent potential of ESG 5.0 on the basis of bibliometric analysis; assessment of opportunities and challenges of the potential impact of co-evolutionary-convergent potential of ESG 5.0 on economic growth in Russia.

   Methods. The research was conducted using the scientific method of systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA model. Methods and tools of bibliometric analysis were used, including VosViewer, biblioshiny in R-environment and Lens analytics. ChatGPT-4 model was applied as an intelligent assistant for analyzing and structuring information.

   Results. The key trends and tendencies of ESG 5.0 co-evolutionary and convergent potential formation were revealed. The analysis of the relationship between the concepts of “Industry 5.0” and “ESG” was carried out, the most productive authors and organizations, as well as the main directions of research were identified. The significant role of ESG 5.0 in stimulating sus-
tainable and innovative growth of the Russian economy was confirmed.

   Conclusions. The coevolutionary and convergent potential of ESG 5.0 is of great importance for promoting industrial growth and sustainable development of the Russian economy. In order to realize this potential, it is necessary to create appropriate infrastructure, adapt the regulatory environment and increase investment in research and development.

1. Babkin A., Shkarupeta E., Danilov D., Tashenova L., Nosirov I. From ESG to EICSG (Environment, Intelligent, Cyber, Social, Governance) strategic management in Industry 5.0. E3S Web of Conferences. 2024;531:05017. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202453105017

2. Okoli C. A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2015;37:43. DOI: 10.17705/1CAIS.03743

3. Ismail A.M., Azman K.B.B. The impact of environmental, social, and governance performance on financial performance: Evidence from Japanese companies. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology. 2024;8(3):236-258. DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i3.950

4. Whittaker D.H. Open access: Beyond secular stagnation: A digital and green economy? The Japanese Political Economy. 2021;47(4):365-386. DOI: 10.1080/2329194X.2021.2012806

5. Romanova O.A., Sirotin D.V. Basic industries of Russia’s industrial regions: The image of the future. Journal of New Economy. 2022;23(2):9-28. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29141/2658-5081-2022-23-2-1

6. Nicoletti B. Proposition of value and Fintech organizations in Banking 5.0. In: Nicoletti B. Banking 5.0: How Fintech will change traditional banks in the ‘new normal’ post pandemic. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2021:91-152. (Palgrave Studies in Financial Services Technology). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-75871-4_4

7. Savchenko V.M., Kononenko L.V., Gai O.M. Financial and statistical analysis in risk management in the financial market within the context of “Industry 5.0”. Ekonomіchnii prostіr. 2024;(189):167-173. (In Ukrain.). DOI: 10.32782/2224-6282/189-31

8. Chen L., Shen Q., Yu X., Chen X. Knowledge spillovers along the sustainable supply chain of China’s listed companies: The role of long-term orientation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2024;9(2):100478. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2024.100478

9. De Giovanni P. Sustainability of the metaverse: A transition to Industry 5.0. Sustainability. 2023;15(7):6079. DOI: 10.3390/su15076079

10. Sood S., Kim A. The golden age of the Big Data audit: Agile practices and innovations for e-commerce, post-quantum cryptography, psychosocial hazards, artificial intelligence algorithm audits, and deepfakes. International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development. 2023;9(2):7-23. DOI: 10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.92.2001

11. Zhironkin S., Ezdina N. Review of transition from Mining 4.0 to Mining 5.0 innovative technologies. Applied Sciences. 2023;13(8):4917. DOI: 10.3390/app13084917

12. Chen L., Xie J., Zhang X., Deng J., Ge S., Wang F.-Y. Mining 5.0: Concept and framework for intelligent mining systems in CPSS. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles. 2023;8(6):3533-3536. DOI: 10.1109/tiv.2023.3285417

13. Serrano W. Smart or intelligent assets or infrastructure: Technology with a purpose. Buildings. 2023;13(1):131. DOI: 10.3390/buildings13010131

14. Bogdan V., Rus L., Gherai D.S., Florea A.G., Bugnar N.G. A streamline sustainable business performance reporting model by an integrated FinESG approach. Sustainability. 2023;15(24):16860. DOI: 10.3390/su152416860

15. Rehman A., Ganesan Y., Al-Maskari N. Influence of internal audit on implementation of environmental, social, and governance factor: Case of public listed companies in Oman. In: Żywiołek J., Rosak-Szyrocka J., Nayyar A., Naved M., eds. Modern technologies and tools supporting the development of Industry 5.0. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2024:339-380. DOI: 10.1201/9781003489269-10

16. Short L.G. Measuring trust for accountability in an untrusted digital world. IEEE Technology Policy and Ethics. 2021;6(6):1-5. DOI: 10.1109/ntpe.2021.9778150

17. Ferreira C.B.D., Da Silva V.L.A. A relação da Sociedade 5.0 com a iniciativa de esg nas organizações: Pesquisa exploratória sobre a importância desta abordagem. PUC-Rio: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro. 2022. DOI: 10.17771/PUCRio.acad.57089

18. Cherevatskyi D.Y. The resilience of economics and the economics of resilience. Ekonomіka promislovostі = Economy of Industry. 2023;(1):31-39. (In Ukrain.). DOI: 10.15407/econindustry2023.01.031

19. Asif M., Searcy C., Castka P. ESG and Industry 5.0: The role of technologies in enhancing ESG disclosure. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2023;195:122806. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122806

20. Yoşumaz İ., Uzun H. The relationship between Industry 5.0 process and ESG process: A qualitative analysis in the context of Türkiye’s BIST Sustainability 25 Index white good sector. Environmental Research and Technology. 2024. DOI: 10.35208/ert.1431800

21. Rehman A., Umar T. Literature review: Industry 5.0. Leveraging technologies for environmental, social and governance advancement in corporate settings. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. 2024. DOI: 10.1108/CG-11-2023-0502

22. Sekaran A., Dadwal S.S., Ali A. Industry 5.0 and environmental, social, and governance initiatives in supply chain sustainability: A study of the European fast fashion industry. In: Dadwal S., Kumar P., Verma R., Singh G. Opportunities and challenges of Business 5.0 in emerging markets. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2023:151-171. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-6403-8.ch008

23. Petrica I.M., Caraiani C., Lungu C.I., Anica-Popa L.-E. The interconnectivity of ESG research within the realm of sustainability: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems. 2024;23(1):261-290. DOI: 10.24818/jamis.2024.01011

24. Egorova G.I., Marinova A.A. The educational potential of functional literacy in the parameters of conceptuality and regional practice. Vestnik Surgutskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Surgut State Pedagogical University. 2022;(4):32-44. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26105/sspu.2022.79.4.004

25. Shkarupeta E., Babkin A. Eco-innovative development of industrial ecosystems based on the quintuple helix. International Journal of Innovation Studies. 2024;8(3):273-286. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijis.2024.04.002

26. Donthu N., Kumar S., Mukherjee D., Pandey N., Lim W.M. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 2021;133:285-296. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

27. Jain K., Tripathi P.S. Mapping the environmental, social and governance literature: A bibliometric and content analysis. Journal of Strategy and Management. 2023;16(3):397-428. DOI: 10.1108/JSMA-05-2022-0092

28. Khan M.A. ESG disclosure and firm performance: A bibliometric and meta analysis. Research in International Business and Finance. 2022;61:101668. DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101668

29. Gamidullaeva L.A. Smart specialization: Origin and state of the art. MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitie) = MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2024;15(1):166-184. DOI: 10.18184/2079-4665.2024.15.1.166-184

30. Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Medicine. 2021;18(3):e1003583. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583

31. Scholar search results. Lens. URL: https://www.lens.org/lens/search/scholar/list?q= (accessed on 07. 07. 2024).

32. Free access to the Dimensions linked research database. Dimensions. URL: https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication (accessed on 07. 07. 2024).

33. Stats. OpenAlex. URL: https://openalex.org/works (accessed on 07. 07. 2024).

34. Rezensionen. Datenschutz Datensicherheit (DuD). 2016;40(4):259-264. DOI: 10.1007/s11623-016-0591-0

35. Popkova E.G., ed. Smart green innovations in Industry 4.0 for climate change risk management. Cham: Springer-Verlag; 2023. 660 p. (Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-28457-1

36. Caiado R.G.G., Scavarda L.F., Gavião L.O., et al. A fuzzy rule-based Industry 4.0 maturity model for operations and supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics. 2021;231:107883. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107883

37. Alkaraan F., Albitar K., Hussainey K., Venkatesh V.G. Corporate transformation toward Industry 4.0 and financial performance: The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG). Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022;175:121423. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121423

38. Raja Santhi A., Muthuswamy P. Industry 5.0 or Industry 4.0S? Introduction to Industry 4.0 and a peek into the prospective Industry 5.0 technologies. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM). 2023;17(2):947-979. DOI: 10.1007/s12008-023-01217-8

39. Alkaraan F., Elmarzouky M., Hussainey K., Venkatesh V.G. Sustainable strategic investment decision-making practices in UK companies: The influence of governance mechanisms on synergy between Industry 4.0 and circular economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2023;187:122187. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122187

40. Nitlarp T., Kiattisin S. The impact factors of Industry 4.0 on ESG in the energy sector. Sustainability. 2022;14(15):9198. DOI: 10.3390/su14159198

41. Saxena A., Singh R., Gehlot A., et al. Technologies empowered environmental, social, and governance (ESG): An Industry 4.0 landscape. Sustainability. 2023;15(1):309. DOI: 10.3390/su15010309

42. Yu W., Gu Y., Dai J. Industry 4.0-enabled environment, social, and governance reporting: A case from a Chinese energy company. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting. 2023;20(1):245-258. DOI: 10.2308/JETA-2022-014

43. Concept of technological development for the period up to 2030. Approved by the order of the Government of the Russian Federation of May 20, 2023 No. 1315-r. Official website of the Government of Russia. URL: http://static.government.ru/media/files/KlJ6A00A1K5t8Aw93NfRG6P8OIbBp18F.pdf (accessed on 07. 07. 2024). (In Russ.).

44. On the Strategy for scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of February 28, 2024 No. 145. Official website of the President of Russia. URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/50358 (accessed on 07. 07. 2024). (In Russ.).