Transformation of the institutional code of economic development of industrialized regions in the context of scientific and technological approach
https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2023-11-1284-1296
Abstract
Aim. To develop a methodological approach to the transformation of the institutional code of economic development of an industrial region, which consists in the introduction of a new institute to stimulate scientific and technological development.
Objectives. To reveal the peculiarities of the economic development agency as a source of transformation of the region’s institutional code; to propose schemes of transformation of the institutional code of economic development of the industrial region taking into account the assessment of the level of consistency of the trajectories of its scientific-technological and socioeconomic development; to determine the functions of the economic development agency ensuring the transformation of the Sverdlovsk region’s institutional code.
Methods. Modified Frobenius norms are applied, which allow to design trajectories of scientific-technological and socio-economic development, reflecting the dominant trends of changes in the regions, and to determine the degree of consistency of these trajectories.
Results. The article reflects the approbation of the author’s methodological approach on the example of the Sverdlovsk Oblast. As a result, a partial consistency of the trajectories of scientific and technological and socio-economic development of the Sverdlovsk region in the time interval 2012–2018 is revealed. Recommendations on strengthening the functions of the Economic Development Agency in the context of its participation in the implementation of the territorial projects “Ural Technopolis” and “Ural Engineering School” have been developed.
Conclusions. Transformation of the institutional code of industrial regions is possible in the context of creating economic development agencies that create conditions for the growth of scientific and technological initiatives of economic transformation on the ground, ensuring the growth of consistency of development trajectories of territories as a whole.
Keywords
About the Author
Yu. G. MyslyakovaRussian Federation
Yuliya G. Myslyakova, PhD in Economics, Head of the Laboratory of Economic Genetics of Regions
Scopus Author ID: 57190430830
Researcher ID: B-6076-2018
29 Moskovskaya st., Yekaterinburg 620014
Competing Interests:
the author declares no conflict of interest related to the publication of this article.
References
1. Myslyakova Yu.G., Shamova E.A., Ezhova M.G., Kirillova V.V. Theoretical aspects of modeling the socio-economic genotype of industrial regions of the Russian Federation. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii = Russian Journal of the Economic Theory. 2019;16(1):37-45. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-1.4
2. Myslyakova Yu.G., Shamova E.A., Neklyudova N.P. Social and economic genotype territories of the advancing development on example of the Ural Region. Journal of Applied Economic Research. 2020;19(3):310-328. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15826/vestnik.2020.19.3.015
3. Public declaration of goals and objectives of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation for 2021. Approved by the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia. Konsul’tantPlyus. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_387714/?ysclid=lnspnr7pys475399154 (accessed on 20.04.2023). (In Russ.).
4. Message from the President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation of December 3, 2015. Garant.ru. URL: https://base.garant.ru/71265528/ (accessed on 20.04.2023). (In Russ.).
5. Shelomentsev A.G., Tolchenkin Yu.A. Strategy for innovative technological development of the Russian coal industry based on increased investment activity. Preprint. Yekarerinburg: Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2006. 42 p. (In Russ.).
6. Maude A., Beer A. Regional development agencies in Australia: A comparative evaluation of institutional strengths and weaknesses. The Town Planning Review. 2000;71(1):1-24. DOI: 10.3828/tpr.71.1.y7227415l8171674
7. Bentley G., Gibney J. Regional development agencies and business change. London: Routledge; 2000. 264 p.
8. Bellini N., Danson M., Halkier H. Regional development agencies: The next generation? London: Routledge; 2012. 336 p.
9. Alden J. The Transfer from a problem to a powerful region: The experience of Wales. In: Alden J., Boland P. Regional development strategies: A European perspective. London: Jessica Kingsley; 1996:129-158.
10. Balatsky E.V., Ekimova N.A. Modern ways to boost economic growth in regions. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2020;13(3):74-92. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.3.69.6 (In Russ.: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz. 2020;13(3):74- 92. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.3.69.6).
11. Halkier H., Danson M., Dambor C. Regional development agencies in Europe. London: Jessica Kingsley; 1998. 374 p. DOI: 10.4324/9781315000206
12. Halkier H. Development agencies and regional policy: The case of the Scottish development agency. Regional Politics and Policy. 1992;2(3):1-26. DOI: 10.1080/13597569208420846
13. Gudimenko G.V., Zotov V.B., Ibyatov F.M. Strategic partnership between the state and large business in order to implement significant state projects. Vestnik universiteta (Gosudarstvennyi universitet upravleniya). 2018;(12):23-27. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26425/1816-4277-2018-12-23-27
14. Komarova A.V., Kritsyna E.A. On the proportion of human capital in GRP of Russian regions. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie nauki = Vestnik NSU. Series: Social and Economic Sciences. 2012;12(3):5-14. (In Russ.).
15. Barinova V.A., Zemtsov S.P., Tsareva Yu.V. Entrepreneurship and institutions: Does the relationship exist at the regional level in Russia? Voprosy ekonomiki. 2018;(6):92-116. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2018-6-92-116
16. Kuznetsova O.V. Pyramid of factors of regional socio-economic development. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2013;(2):121-131. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2013-2-121-131
17. Romanova O.A. Strategic vector of economic dynamics of the industrial region. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Regions. 2014;(1):43-56. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17059/2014-1-3
18. Myslyakova Yu.G., Matushkina N.A. Modeling of the basic code of the region’s innovation and industrial development: Theoretical aspects and methodological recommendations. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta = Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics. 2018;(3):15-22. (In Russ.).
19. Andreeva E.L., Karkh D.A., Myslyakova Yu.G. Conceptual approach to forming the basic code of neo-industrial development of a region. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Regions. 2017;13(3):732-745. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17059/2017-3-8
20. Comprehensive Strategy on Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) for 2017. Cabinet Office (Council for Science, Technology and Innovation). 2017. URL: https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/doc/2017stistrategy_main.pdf (accessed on 20.04.2023).
21. Strategy for industrial and innovative development of the Sverdlovsk region for the period until 2035. Approved by Decree of the Government of the Sverdlovsk Region dated June 28, 2019 No. 383-PP. Ministry of Industry and Science of the Sverdlovsk Region. URL: https://mpr.midural.ru/docs/strategy/ (accessed on 20.04.2023). (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Myslyakova Yu.G. Transformation of the institutional code of economic development of industrialized regions in the context of scientific and technological approach. Economics and Management. 2023;29(11):1284-1296. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2023-11-1284-1296