Structural features of the municipal economy: Assessment and interpretation
https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2023-9-1094-1108
Abstract
Aim. To propose an algorithm for structuring the economy of municipalities, allowing to determine their economic profile and classify them.
Tasks. To generalize the available approaches to the structuring of the economy on the basis of the analysis of the types of structures, structural features and evaluation parameters identified in the scientific literature; to identify the limitations of the structural analysis of the economy due to the level of the object of study (municipal entity); to propose a methodology for analyzing the structural features of the economy of municipal entities, allowing to classify them in accordance with their inherent economic specifics.
Methods. Theoretical and methodological basis of the study was formed by a set of scientific ideas in the field of regional economics, economic analysis, statistics. The author applied general scientific methods of theoretical and empirical cognition (logical, dialectical, comparative, cause-and-effect method, method of analysis and synthesis, method of scientific abstraction).
Results. The algorithm of economic structuring is described, which includes such stages as defining the logic of this process, identifying the most significant structural features, selecting indicators for analysis, proposing a methodology for working with the selected indicators and determining approaches to the interpretation of calculation results. It is shown that the most significant problem of the study of economic structure at the municipal level is the limited number of indicators available for analysis. A methodological approach to analyzing the structural features of the economy of municipalities is proposed, which involves the use of data on the number of employed in their economy in terms of types of activities (taking into account small and micro-enterprises) and their subsequent classification, i.e. the allocation of agrarian, industrial, service types (with the possibility of combining them and designating subtypes in relation to the objects for which industrial activities are significant), as well as a separate category of municipalities, which do not have a pronounced economic structure.
Conclusions. The proposed algorithm for analyzing the structural features of the economy of municipalities, taking into account the existing approaches and limitations of the statistical apparatus, can be used in practice (in determining the economic profile of municipalities, their economic specifics). This makes it useful for governing bodies of territories of different levels, responsible for the implementation of economic and spatial transformations.
Keywords
About the Author
A. V. SuvorovaRussian Federation
Arina V. Suvorova - PhD in Economics, Deputy Director for Research
29 Moskovskaya st., Yekaterinburg 620014.
Competing Interests:
The author declares no conflict of interest related to the publication of this article.
References
1. Lohmutov S.V. Sectoral structure of South Asian countries’ economy. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Ekonomika = RUDN Journal of Economics. 2009;(3): 37-44. (In Russ.).
2. Khoroshilov E.E. Canadian economy: Characteristics and evolution of sectoral structure. SShA i Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kul’tura = USA and Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture. 2011;(4):43-62. (In Russ.).
3. Elsukov M.Yu. Territorial and branch structure of the economy: Approaches to the study and management. Nauchnye trudy Severo-Zapadnogo instituta upravleniya RANKhiGS. 2014;5(3):104-112. (In Russ.).
4. Volkova A.G. Sectoral composition of the economy as a typological attribute. Vestnik Baltiiskogo federal’nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta. Seriya: Estestvennye i meditsinskie nauki = IKBFUs Vestnik: Natural and Medical Sciences. 2022;(3):52-67. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.5922/gikbfu-2022-3-4
5. Schipper L., Howarth R., Carlassare E. Energy intensity, sectoral activity, and structural change in the Norwegian economy. Energy. 1992;17(3):215-233. DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(92)90050-A
6. Polyan P.M., Treivish A.I. Territorial structures in science and practice. Moscow: Znanie; 1988. 48 p. (In Russ.).
7. Artobolevskii S.S., Glezer O.B., eds. Space, people, economy of Ugra: Socio-economic transformation of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug. Moscow: Ekonomist; 2007. 415 p. (In Russ.).
8. Valdez-Ramírez R.I., Sobrevilla V. The sectoral-regional structure of the wages in Mexico. Papeles de Población. 2021;27(108):185-209. DOI: 10.22185/24487147.2021.108.16
9. Moshkov A.V. Spatial features of the formation of the territorial and sectoral structure of the economy of the subjects of the Far Eastern Federal District of the Russian Federation. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki = Problems of Modern Economics. 2018;(1):127-132. (In Russ.).
10. Burduli V., Abesadze R. Sectoral, technological, and institutional-organizational structures of the Georgian economy: Development issues in the context of globalization. Kavkaz i globalizatsiya = The Caucasus & Globalization. 2013;7(1-2):55-73. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17686/sced_rusnauka_2013-1671
11. Lebedev Yu. Institutional structure of the innovation economy of Russia. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiiskoi akademii nauk = Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2008;(4):214-227. (In Russ.).
12. Ogurtsova E.V. Functional structure of the Russian economy: Theory and methodology. Saratov: Nauchnaya Kniga; 2011; 165 p. (In Russ.).
13. Babkin A.V., ed. Cluster structure of industrial economy. St. Petersburg: Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University; 2014. 300 p. (In Russ.).
14. Tupikina E.N., Khablak V.V. Russian economy sectors structure. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya = Fundamental Research. 2017;(7):188-192. (In Russ.).
15. de Vries G., Timmer M., de Vries K. Structural transformation in Africa: Static gains, dynamic losses. The Journal of Development Studies. 2015;51(6):674-688. DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2014.997222
16. Klyuzina S.V., Lukashova T.A. The structure of the regionэs economy and socio-economic indicators of its development. Vestnik Ivanovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika = Ivanovo State University Bulletin. Series: Economics. 2012;(3):10-19. (In Russ.).
17. Kormanovskaya I.R. Structure of the economy of the Novgorod region and its compliance with the objectives of sustainable innovative development. Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional Economics: Theory and Practice. 2013;(5):9-21. (In Russ.).
18. Diao X., McMillan M., Rodrik D. The recent growth boom in developing economies: A structural-change perspective. In: Nissanke M., Ocampo J.A., eds. The Palgrave handbook of development economics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2019:281-334. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-14000-7_9
19. Kuznetsova O.V. Structure of economy in Russian regions and the level of their socioeconomic development. Nauchnye trudy: Institut narodnokhozyaistvennogo prognozirovaniya RAN = Scientific Articles: Institute of Economic Forecasting. Russian Academy of Sciences. 2018;16:473-493. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29003/m275.sp_ief_ras2018/473-493
20. Martynov V.L. Regional structure of the economy of the North-West of Russia at the beginning of the 21st century. Regional’nye issledovaniya. 2006;(1):63-70. (In Russ.).
21. Database of indicators of municipalities. Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat). URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Munst.htm (accessed on 12.07.2023). (In Russ.).
22. Voroshilov N.V. Features and problems of formation and use of the statistical information on the municipalities of Russia. ETAP: ekonomicheskaya teoriya, analiz, praktika = ETAP: Economic Theory, Analysis, and Practice. 2022;(6):89-105. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24412/2071-6435-2022-6-89-105
23. Skripkina T.B. Statistical study of the infrastructure of municipalities. Cand. econ. sci. diss. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management; 2021. 216 p. (In Russ.).
24. Quality of life index in Russian cities. VEB.RF. URL: https://citylifeindex.ru/ (accessed on 15.07.2023). (In Russ.).
25. Druzhinin A.G., Shuvalov V.E., eds. Theory of socio-economic geography: The spectrum of modern views. Rostov-on-Don: South Federal University; 2010. 166 p. (In Russ.).
26. Yurina V.S. Systems’s analysis of the city’s economic development. Vestnik Tol’yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta servisa. Seriya: Ekonomika. 2007;(2):284-291. (In Russ.).
27. Yakishin Yu.V. Methodological procedures of formation of the city economy perspective structure. Uchenye zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta tekhnologii upravleniya i ekonomiki = Uchenye zapiski St. Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics. 2015;(1):5-11. (In Russ.).
28. Brief methodological commentary on the Database of indicators characterizing the state of the economy and social sphere of the municipality. Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat). URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/met_bdpmo.htm (accessed on 15.07.2023). (In Russ.).
29. Unified register of small and medium enterprises. Federal Tax Service. URL: https://rmsp.nalog.ru/ (accessed on 10.06.2023). (In Russ.).
30. Sukharev O.S., Voronchikhina E.N. Industrialization of the regions of Russia: Structural evaluation by general and special aggregate criteria. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiiskoi akademii nauk = Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2019;(2):9-33. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2073-6487-2019-10014
31. Domakur O.V. Post-industrial society: Structure, features, mechanism and patterns of formation. Ekonomicheskaya nauka segodnya. 2016;(4):39-47. (In Russ.).
32. Gogoberidze G.G. The concept and essence of the maritime economic potential of coastal zones and coastal areas. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki = Problems of Modern Economics. 2008;(2):266-270. (In Russ.).
33. Logachev V.A., Martynchuk O.I. On the criteria for the transition of the economy to the post-industrial stage. Vestnik Kuzbasskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Vestnik of Kuzbass State Technical University. 2006;(5):117-120. (In Russ.).
34. Frolov D.P., Stratulat I.V., Babkin M.M., Solov’eva I.A. Sector-balanced development of the regional economy: Problem statement. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2015;(1-1). URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=17255 (accessed on 29.06.2023). (In Russ.).
35. Eliseeva O.V. Economic structure of the city: Specifics, factors of formation and qualitative features. Terra Economicus. 2009;7(2-3):178-180. (In Russ.).
36. Creating the “All-Russian Classifier of Types of Economic Activity” and its main distinguishing features. Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat). URL: https://www.gks.ru/bgd/free/B99_10/IssWWW.exe/Stg/d040/ii%201-3.htm (accessed on 08.07.2023). (In Russ.).
37. Altunina V.V., Anuchina D.A. Russian regions’ classification in the context of spatial polarization. Ekonomika, predprinimatel’stvo i pravo = Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. 2022;12(5):1453-1474. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18334/epp.12.5.114641
38. Akberdina V.V., Sergeeva A.S. Industrial regions of Russia: Comparative analysis. Vestnik Zabaikal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Transbaikal State University Journal. 2015;(7):98-117. (In Russ.).
39. Egorova A.A., Uzhegov A.O. Features of assessing the quality of life of the population in industrial regions. Upravlenie v sovremennykh sistemakh = Management in Modern Systems. 2022;(3):3-17. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24412/2311-1313-35-3-17
Review
For citations:
Suvorova A.V. Structural features of the municipal economy: Assessment and interpretation. Economics and Management. 2023;29(9):1094-1108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2023-9-1094-1108