An approach to modeling regional effects in the implementation of air transport infrastructure projects
https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2023-4-435-442
Abstract
Aim. The presented study aims to describe the elements of the assessment of the cumulative regional effect from projects for the development of transport and related sectors of the economy of the Russian Federation.
Tasks. The authors investigate the dynamics of changes in passenger traffic in the Far Eastern region through the example of Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk Airport; identify the growth areas of air transport; explore the possibility of regional development based on investment in tourism business; propose an approach to assessing the cumulative regional effect from projects for the development of transport and related sectors of the region’s economy.
Methods. This study uses well-known methods for evaluating composite, sectoral, and multiplicative effects. The proposed approach is based on the formation of a cumulative regional effect with allowance for the advantages of the examined methods and the method of direct calculation of the generated effects.
Results. Development trends and dynamics of passenger traffic in the Far East are determined through the example of Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk Airport, along with the dynamics and current trends of air traffic (including routes to China) in the context of external factors. Opportunities for the development of tourist routes between China and Russia and the need to establish tourist business in the Far East are identified. An approach is proposed to describe the cumulative regional effect from projects for the development of aviation and tourism infrastructure in the region, which in the future can serve as a basis for the development of an appropriate methodology for calculating the effects.
Conclusions. The results of the study can be used to create a methodology for assessing the cumulative regional effects from projects for the development of transportation and related sectors of the economy based on multiplicative effects.
About the Authors
A. V. GubenkoRussian Federation
Alexander V. Gubenko, D.Sc. in Economics, Professor, First Vice-Rector — Vice-Rector for Development and Economics
38 Pilotov St., St. Petersburg 196210
S. A. Borodulina
Russian Federation
Svetlana A. Borodulina, D.Sc. in Economics, Professor, Head of the Department of Economics No. 17
38 Pilotov St., St. Petersburg 196210
A. S. Kruttsov
Russian Federation
Andrey S. Kruttsov, General Director
1 Ivan Kuropatko St., Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Sakhalin 693014
References
1. Korenyako A. Airlines announce problems with flights to China. RBC. Feb. 21, 2023. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/business/21/02/2023/63f389749a794705136ffc9a (accessed on 20.02.2023). (In Russ.).
2. Restrictions on entry to China for Russian tourists. Novosti regionov Rossii. Fe. 14, 2023. URL: https://regioninformburo.ru/14-02-2023-ogranicheniya-vezda-v-kitaj-rossiyanam-turistam-poslednie-novosti/ (accessed on 20.02.2023). (In Russ.).
3. Titov L.Yu. Synergetic and multiplicate effect of innovative networks. Audit i finansovyi analiz = Audit and Financial Analysis. 2010;(2):120-126. (In Russ.).
4. Shirov A.A., Yantovskii A.A. Assessment of multiplier effects in the economy. Opportunities and limitations. EKO: vserossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal = ECO Journal. 2011;(2):40-58. (In Russ.).
5. Anderson D. The multiplier effect. In: Cate T., ed. Encyclopedia of Keynesian economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 1997:450-453.
6. Mathieu A., van Pottelsberghe B. The economic role of the aviation industry in Belgium. Brussels Economic Review. 2005;48(4):393-418.
7. Borodulina S., Pantina T. Model of sustainable economic development in the context of inland water transport management. In: Murgul V., Pukhkal V., eds. Proc. Int. sci. conf. “Energy management of municipal facilities and sustainable energy technologies (EMMFT 2019)”. Cham: Springer-Verlag; 2021:806-819. (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Vol. 1258). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-57450-5_68
8. Kahn R.F. The relation of home investment to unemployment. The Economic Journal. 1931;41(162):173-198. DOI: 10.2307/2223697
9. Button K., Yuan J. Airfreight transport and economic development: An examination of causality. Urban Studies. 2013;50(2):329-340. DOI: 10.1177/0042098012446999
10. Marazzo M., Scherre R., Fernandes E. Air transport demand and economic growth in Brazil: A time series analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2010;46(2):261-269. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2009.08.008
11. Pantina T.A., Borodulina S.A. Methods for estimation of multiplier effect of investments in development of infrastructure of inland water transport in Russian Federation in the frameworks of federal target programs. Review of European Studies. 2015;7(9):83-96. DOI: 10.5539/res.v7n9p83
Review
For citations:
Gubenko A.V., Borodulina S.A., Kruttsov A.S. An approach to modeling regional effects in the implementation of air transport infrastructure projects. Economics and Management. 2023;29(4):435-442. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2023-4-435-442