Corporate governance in multinational corporations: Current approaches to interpretation

Aim. The presented study aims to develop the theoretical foundations of corporate governance in transnational corporations (TNCs) in the context of specifying the economic content of this concept based on a critical analysis of existing approaches to its interpretation.

Tasks. The authors systematize  and  critically  analyze  existing  approaches  to  the  interpretation of corporate governance  of  TNCs;  clarify  the  definition  of  corporate  governance  based on the organizational and socio-economic peculiarities of modern TNCs.

Methods. The methodological basis of this study includes  subjective,  historical,  and  civilizational approaches. The study uses the methods  of  analysis,  grouping,  and  systematization. The materials used include works of well-known scientists and economists on the problem under consideration.

Results. The authors critically  analyze  literary  sources  on  the  problem  of  identifying  the  economic essence  of  corporate  governance  of  TNCs.  Four  major  approaches  to  the  interpretation of corporate governance reflecting the evolution of this phenomenon are identified and described: center-right approach (corporate governance is considered as a legalized voluntary agreement between the owners   and   the   executive   body   in   connection   with   the   management of   the   corporation’s   economic   activities);   managerial   approach   (corporate   governance   serves to resolve the conflict of interests between shareholders acting as   real   owners   and   professional managers who actually manage the  corporation);  shareholder-centered  aprroach  (corporate governance  is  considered  from  the  perspective  of  shareholders’  interests  and  the  growth of stock prices in the stock market is used  as  the  main  criterion  of  TNC  performance;  socially oriented approach (emerged  in  response  to  the  growing  rejection  of  social  inequality  by the  population  and  employees  as  a  result  of  the  TNCs’  focus  on  maximizing  profit,  environmental  problems, strengthening of ideological and political opponents of the   neoliberal   economy; this approach comprises many concepts, such  as  the  concept  of  corporate  social  responsibility, corporate social capital, knowledge network theory, and the concept of the company participation).   As   the   theory   and   practice   of   corporate   governance   developed,   the   emphasis in its interpretation shifted from owners to managers, from managers to   shareholders   and, finally, from shareholders to a wide range  of  interested  parties  (the  state,  the  local  community, employees, contractors).

Conclusions. Based on the analysis of viewpoints and the  study  of  the  distinctive  characteristics of  modern  corporate  governance,  the  following  refined  definition  is  proposed:  corporate governance  of  TNCs  is  the  organizational  and  economic  relations  between  professional top managers, capital owners, labor collectives, public administration bodies, and other stakeholders in the context of the implementation of the corporation’s strategic  goals  by  ensuring the effeciency of the mechanism  for  making  effective  decisions  and  monitoring  the results.

1. Taylor F.W. The principles of scientific Management. New York, London: Harper & Brothers; 1911. 152 р.

2. Macneil R. Contracts: Adjustment of long-term economic relations under classical, neoclassical and relational contract law. Northwestern University Law Review. 1978;72(6):854-905.

3. Owen G., Kirchmaier T., Grant J. Colin Mayer on corporate governance systems – how much convergence? In: Corporate governance in the US and Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006:31-36. DOI: 10.1057/9780230512450_4

4. Hart O., Moore J. Incomplete contracts and renegotiation. Econometrica. 1988;56(4):755785. DOI: 10.2307/1912698

5. Alchian A.A. Demsetz H. Production, information costs, and economic organization. The American Economic Review. 1972;62(5):777-795. DOI: 10.1109/EMR.1975.4306431

6. Smith A. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell; 1776. 589 p.

7. Berle A., Means G. The modern corporation and private property. New York, NY: MacMillan; 1932. 344 р.

8. Huyghebaert N., Wang L. Expropriation of minority investors in Chinese listed firms: The role of internal and external corporate governance mechanisms. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 2012;20(3):308-332. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00909.x

9. Shleifer A. Vishny R.W. A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance. 1997; 52(2):737-783. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x

10. Eisenberg M.A. The structure of the corporation: A legal analysis. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co.; 1976. 352 р.

11. Drucker P.F. Management challenges for the 21st century. New York, NY: HarperBusiness; 2001. 224 p. (Russ. ed.: Drucker P. Zadachi menedzhmenta v XXI veke. Moscow: Williams; 2004. 272 p.).

12. Korotkov E.M., ed. Crisis management. Moscow: Infra-M; 2006. 620 p. (In Russ.).

13. Easterbrook F.H., Fischel D.R. Voting in corporate law. The Journal of Law & Economics. 1983;26(2):395-427. DOI: 10.1086/467043

14. La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A. Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance. 1999;54(2):471-517. DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00115

15. Young M.N., Peng M.W., Ahlstrom D., Bruton G.D., Jiang Y. Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal-principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies. 2008;45(1):196-220. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00752.x

16. Peregudov S.P. Corporations. Society. State. Moscow: Nauka; 2003. 350 p. (In Russ.).

17. Van Apeldorn E.B. The rise of shareholder capitalism in continental Europe? The commodification of corporate control and the transformation of European corporate governance. In: Proc. 18th World congr. of the International Political Science Association (Québec City, 1-5 August, 2000). 2000:1-31.

18. Hitt M.A., Lee H.-U., Yucel E. The importance of social capital to the management of multinational enterprises: Relational networks among Asian and Western firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 2002;19(2):353-372. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016247920461

19. Adler P.S., Kwon S.-W. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review. 2002;27(1):17-40. DOI: 10.2307/4134367

20. Seifert S.E., Kraimer M.L., Liden R.C. A social capital theory of career success. The Academy of Management Journal. 2001;44(2):219-237. DOI: 10.2307/3069452

21. Wee C.H., Lan L.L. The 36 strategies of the Chinese: Adapting an ancient Chinese wisdom to the business world. Singapore: Addison-Wesley; 1998. 298 p.

22. Peng M.W., Lu Y., Shenkar O., Wang D.Y.L. Treasures in the China house: A review of management and organizational research on Greater China. Journal of Business Research. 2001;52(2):95-110. DOI: 10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00063-6

23. Locke E.A., Noorderhaven N.G., Cannon J.P., Doney P.M., Mullen M.R. Some reservations about social capital. The Academy of Management Review. 1999;24(1):8-11. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1999.15873796

24. Talmud I. Corporate social capital and liability: A conditional approach to three consequences of corporate social structure. In: Leenders R., Gabbay S.M., eds. Corporate social capital and liability. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999:106-117.

25. Adler P.S., Kwon S.-W. Social capital: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In: Lesser E.L., ed. Knowledge and social capital: Foundations and applications. Boston, MA: Butterworth Heinemann; 2000:89-115.

26. Kakinuma S., Fukunaga H. The $4 trillion question. Tokyo Business Today. 1995;63(11): 28-32.

27. Hutton W. The stakeholding society: Writings on politics and economics. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1999. 296 p.

28. Key J. The foundation of corporate success: How business strategies add value. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993. 416 p.

29. Pens I.Sh., Furs S.A. Corporate governance in modern Russian industry: State of the art and factors for improvement. Moscow: Nedra Communications Ltd; 2008. 120 p. (In Russ.).

30. Minford P. Markets, not stakes: The triumph of capitalism and the stakeholder fallacy. London: Orion; 1999. 242 p.