Development of citizen science as a mechanism of scientific knowledge creation in the digital environment

Aim. The presented study aims to identify the causes and factors that determine the positive effect of integrating the efforts of the representatives of institutionalized (professional) and social (citizen) science to obtain new knowledge in the digital environment; to investigate the phenomenon of “citizen science” in the context of current trends in the development of scientific knowledge creation mechanisms.

Tasks. The authors examine approaches to understanding the essence of the concept of “citizen science” in relation to the concepts of participation, distributed knowledge, Science 2.0, etc.; identify opportunities and promising areas for the collaboration between professional and citizen science; formulate conditions and directions for further development of scientific knowledge creation mechanisms involving scientific volunteering.

Methods. This study uses general scientific methods of cognition in various aspects to consider the phenomenon and concept of “citizen science” as a vital component of the mechanisms of scientific knowledge creation in project form using the capabilities of digital tools and network technology.

Results. The genesis and priority directions for the development of citizen science are described. The reasons and factors of complementarity between professional and citizen science are substantiated. The development of digital tools and network technology is considered as an essential condition for further development of scientific knowledge creation mechanisms.

Conclusions. The development of citizen science is a natural stage in the development of society, which requires consolidated efforts of the bearers of different competencies to collect and process scientific data for further development.

1. Deryugina O. Discover a star without getting up from your chair: What citizen science is, and what it is capable of. Nozh. Feb. 01, 2021. URL: https://knife.media/civil-science/ (accessed on 20.07.2022). (In Russ.).

2. Strasser B.J., Baudry J., Mahr D., Sanchez G., Tancoigne E. “Citizen Science“? Rethinking science and public participation. Science & Technology Studies. 2019;32(2):52-76. DOI: 10.23987/sts.60425

3. Irwin А. Citizen science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. London: Routledge; 1995. 212 p.

4. Sokolova T.D. Citizen and professional science: The great tide experiment’s case. The Digital Scholar: Philosopher’s Lab. 2020;3(4):107-114. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.5840/dspl20203443

5. Bonney R., Dickinson J.L. Overview of citizen science. In: Dickinson J.L., Bonney R.E., Jr., eds. Citizen science: Public participation in environmental research. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2012:19-26.

6. Muravyeva A.A., Oleynikova O.N. The universities’ role in developing citizen science discourse. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2021;25(3):45-55. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2021.03.026

7. Hecker S., Haklay M., Bowser A., Makuch Z., Vogel J., Bonn A., eds. Citizen science: Innovation in open science, society and policy. London: UCL Press; 2018. 542 p.

8. Pirozhkova S.V. The principle of participation and contemporary mechanisms of producing knowledge in science. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki = Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2018;55(1):67-82. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.5840/eps20185519

9. Hoang C. 10 things: Citizen science. NASA Science. Apr. 11, 2018. URL: https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/407/10-things-citizen-science/ (accessed on 20.07.2022).

10. Jenkins H. Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago, IL: The MacArthur Foundation; 2006. 72 p. URL: https://www.macfound.org/media/article_pdfs/jenkins_white_paper.pdf (accessed on 20.07.2022).

11. Mueller M.P., Tippins D., Bryan L.A. The future of citizen science. Democracy and Education. 2011;20(1):1-12. URL: https://democracyeducationjournal.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=home (accessed on 20.07.2022).

12. Volkova A.V. Potential of “civil science” in social and political development. Sotsial’nopoliticheskie issledovaniya = Social and Political Research. 2019;(1):41-50. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2658-428X-2019-10337

13. Surowiecki J. The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations. New York, London: Doubleday; 2005. 336 p. (Russ. ed.: Surowiecki J. Mudrost’ tolpy. Pochemu vmeste my umnee, chem poodinochke, i kak kollektivnyi razum formiruet biznes, ekonomiku, obshchestvo i gosudarstvo. Moscow: Williams; 2007. 304 p.).

14. Sarayeva N.M., Igumnova E.A., Makhnach A.V., Miklyayeva A.V., Gor’kovaya I.A., Laktionova A.I., Postylyakova Yu.V., Sukhanov A.A. Citizen science and international collaboration in social-psychological research. Institut psikhologii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Sotsial’naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya = Institute of Psychology Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology. 2021;6(4):6-33. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.38098/ipran.sep_2021_24_4_01

15. Mazumdar S., Wrigley S., Ciravegna F. Citizen science and crowdsourcing for earth observations: An analysis of stakeholder opinions on the present and future. Remote Sensing. 2017;9(1):87-107. DOI: 10.3390/rs9010087

16. Dowthwaite L., Sprinks J. Citizen science and the professional-amateur divide: Lessons from differing online practices. Journal of Science Communication. 2019;18(1):1-18. DOI: 10.22323/2.18010206

17. Gazoyan A.G. Citizen science as an instrument of science communication: Analysis of Russian practice. Nomothetika: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo = Nomothetika: Philosophy. Sociology. Law. 2020;45(4):810-817. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18413/2712-746X-2020-45-4-810-817

18. Makhnach A.V., Laktionova A.I., Postylyakova Yu.V. Citizen science in socio-psychological research. Institut psikhologii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Sotsial’naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya = Institute of Psychology Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology. 2019;4(4):43-70. (In Russ.).

19. Swanson A., Kosmala M., Lintott C., Packer C. A generalized approach for producing, quantifying, and validating citizen science data from wildlife images. Conservation Biology. 2016;30(3):520-531. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12695

20. Aristeidou M., Herodotou C. Online citizen science: A systematic review of effects on learning and scientific literacy. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice. 2020;5(1):1-11. DOI: 10.5334/cstp.224

21. Fataliyev T.Kh., Verdiyeva N.N. Investigation of application opportunities of Industry 4.0 solutions in citizen science. Informatsionnye tekhnologii. Problemy i resheniya = Information Technology. 2021;(2):39-44. (In Russ.).

22. Kosmala M., Wiggins A., Swanson A., Simmons B. Assessing data quality in citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2016;14(10):551-560. DOI: 10.1002/fee.1436