Countercyclical financing as a tool for stimulating investment activity (specific structuring options)

Aim. The presented study aims to analyze specific options for structuring the financial flows of investment projects with the purpose of increasing investment activity. In this article, which is a continuation of the paper published in the journal ‘Economics and Management’ No. 12 (2021), the authors provide a detailed consideration of options for structuring the financial flows of projects.

Tasks.  The first part of the article gives a general description of the mechanism of project financing in the implementation of investment projects and allocation of risks among participants, while also considering the factor of price volatility and an example of accelerated repayment of financing. The second part provides examples of specific repayment options capable of reducing the risks of a price decline for the investor.

Methodology. This study uses general scientific research methods (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction), including the analysis of risk allocation options in the financial flows of projects and graphical representation of information, comparison of alternatives. Special methods of financial modeling and investment project efficiency assessment are also used.

Results. The authors explore the options for countercyclical financing, describing the development of an optimal schedule and conditions for loan repayment to reduce the risks of negative market conditions for the project initiator. These options are illustrated with graphic examples describing the conditions for the implementation of the proposed investment project, the characteristics of which correlate with the real project.

Conclusions. Approaches to fine-tuning the structure of financing to balance the interests of the project’s initiators and creditors and to stimulate investment activity in general are outlined. Examples are given that can be useful to students, teachers, practitioners in the field of investment analysis and corporate finance, as well as representatives of the banking and business community.

1. Tsekhomskiy N.V., Tikhomirov D.V. Countercyclical financing as a tool for facilitating investment activity in Russia: An overview of approaches. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management. 2021;27(12):932-942. (In Russ.). (In Russ.). DOI: 10.35854/1998-1627-2021-12-932-942

2. Tikhomirov D.V. Financial model as management decisions tool in project finance. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2018;(2):44-51. (In Russ.).

3. Byoun S., Kim J., Yoo S. Risk management with leverage: Evidence from project finance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 2013;48(2):549-577. DOI: 10.1017/S0022109013000082

4. Müllner J. International project finance: Review and implications for international finance and international business. Management Review Quarterly. 2017;67(2):97-133. DOI: 10.1007/s11301-017-0125-3

5. Aretz K., Bartram S.M., Dufey G. Why hedge? Rationales for corporate hedging and value implications. Journal of Risk Finance. 2007;8(5):434-449. DOI: 10.1108/15265940710834735

6. Tikhomirov D., Plotnikov V. The minimisation of risks in project finance: Approaches to financial modelling and structuring. MATEC Web of Conferences. 2018;193:05069. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201819305069

7. Cohn A., Engelmann J., Fehr E., Maréchal M.A. Evidence for countercyclical risk aversion: An experiment with financial professionals. American Economic Review. 2015;105(2):860-885. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20131314

8. Stellinga B. The open-endedness of macroprudential policy. Endogenous risks as an obstacle to countercyclical financial regulation. Business and Politics. 2020;22(1):224-251. DOI: 10.1017/bap.2019.14