Transformation of Socio-Economic Development Priorities in the Post-Pandemic Period

Aim. The presented study aims to substantiate methodological approaches to the transformation of the priorities of government regulation of socio-economic development during the post-crisis period in the context of the circular economy.
Tasks. To achieve the set aim, the authors address the theoretical and practical problems of the transformation of socio-economic development priorities; comprehensively analyze major problems and identify indicators and criteria for assessing the effectiveness of the government regulation of management in a circular economy; provide recommendations for optimizing management decisions at all levels of regulation of economic entities in the postcrisis period.
Methods. This study uses the methods of complex and historical analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, expert assessments, information and communication technologies.
Results. Transformation of the strategic management goal in a circular economy implies structural changes in the priorities of socio-economic development in the classical linear functional model of economic entities based on the introduction of a chain of reusable raw materials in a closed cycle. Business regulation in Russia faces the problems of imperfect institutions of title guarantee and legal regulations that significantly increase risks. Currently, priority directions for the transformation of e-government in a circular economy include such areas as legislative support for the operation of economic entities within a single network space, education, technological innovations, innovative design, digital infrastructure, secure storage and processing of analytic databases. The efficiency of government regulation in the post-pandemic period can be improved by developing and implementing comprehensive programs strategically aimed at creating favorable conditions for sustainable interaction between the business and the government in a circular economy.
Conclusions. Transformation of the priorities of government regulation of socio-economic development in the post-pandemic period involves substantiating the scenarios and organizational forms of their implementation aimed at anti-crisis optimization of the regional development program. Under modern conditions, a priority goal for administrative bodies is to achieve balanced parameters that would enhance Russia's competitiveness in the global market of goods and services with allowance for the principles of the circular economy. Target parameters affecting regional growth and development include reduced usage and replenishment of natural resource potential; introduction of closed cycles of production, consumption, distribution, exchange; transition towards zero waste technological chains in all segments; transformation of all spheres of socio-economic development to meet global environmental standards in raw materials, components, etc.

1. Bezdudnaya A.G., Vengertsev V.G. Ecological and economic aspects of the use of secondary material resources (SMR) as a vector of the modern concept of regional development. Konkurentosposobnost’ v global’nom mire: ekonomika, nauka, tekhnologii = Competitiveness in the Global World: Economics, Science, Technology. 2017;(8-4):11-15. (In Russ.).

2. Pakhomova N.V., Richter K.K., Vetrova M.A. Transition to a circular economy and closedloop supply chains as a driver of sustainable development. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ekonomika = St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies (SUJES). 2017;33(2):244-268. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu05.2017.203

3. Aganbegyan A.G., Klepach A.N., Porfiryev B.N., Uzyakov M.N., Shirov A.A. Post-pandemic recovery: The Russian economy and the transition to sustainable social and economic developmet. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2020;31(6):599-605. DOI: 10.1134/S1075700720060027 (In Russ.: Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2020;(6):18-26. DOI 10.47711/0868-6351-183-18-26).

4. Nureev R.M. Industrial society and its socio-economic contradictions. Political economy of labor. Terra Economicus. 2012;10(2):123-149. (In Russ.).

5. Drexl J., Lee N., eds. Pharmaceutical innovation, competition and patent law: A trilateral perspective. Cheltenham, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd; 2013. 345 p.

6. Boutellier R., Heinzen M. Growth through innovation: Managing the technology-driven enterprise. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2014. 263 p.

7. Maksyutina E., Golovkin A. Neo-industrialization of Russian economics on the basis of technologies of the fourth industrial revolution and human capital development. Nauchnotekhnicheskie vedomosti Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie nauki = St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics. 2017;10(1):43-52. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18721/JE.10104

8. Burgonov O.V., Golubetskaya N.P., Vinogradova N.Yu. Simulation of a corporate entreprprise management system. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management. 2017;(3):60-69. (In Russ.).

9. Golubetskaya N.P., Ushakova E.V., Chirkova T.V. Possible scenarios for the innovative development of regional entreprises in the context of restructuring of the Russian economy. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management. 2018;(10):68-74. (In Russ.).

10. Kovalchuk J.A., Stepnov I. The digital economy: Transformation of industrial enterprises. Innovatsii v menedzhmente = Innovations in Management. 2017;(1):32-43. (In Russ.).

11. Petrov A.A. The digital economy: The challenge to Russia. Torgovaya politika = Trade Policy Journal. 2017;(3):46-74. (In Russ.).

12. Schumpeter J.A. Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung: Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus. München, Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker & Humblot; 1911. 369 p. (Russ. ed.: Schumpeter J.A. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. Issledovanie predprinimatel’skoy pribyli, kapitala, kredita, protsenta i tsikla kon”yunktury. Moscow: Progress; 1982. 455 p.).

13. Porter M.E. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press; 1990. 896 p. (Russ. ed.: Porter M. Mezhdunarodnaya konkurentsiya: Konkurentnye preimushchestva stran. Moscow: Alpina Publisher; 2016. 740 p.).

14. Byankin A.S., Burdakova G.I. Development of innovative entrepreneurship in the region based on a higher education institution: solving the problems of personnel training. Nauchnotekhnicheskie vedomosti Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie nauki = St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics. 2018;11(1):136-145. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18721/JE.11112

15. Yashin S.N., Ambartsumjan A.E. Methodical approaches to innovative development management of advertising companied in digital economy. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti SanktPeterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie nauki = St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics. 2018;11(6):153-163. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18721/JE.11613

16. Ding M., Eliashberg J., Stremersch S., eds. Innovation and marketing in the pharmaceutical industry: Emerging practices, research, and policies. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2014. 775 p.