Inter-Component Relations in a Human-Centered Economy (Part 2)
https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2021-9-687-696
Abstract
Aim. The presented study aims to identify and describe the relations of mutual restriction between the fundamental spheres of a human-oriented economy.
Tasks. The author describes problems associated with the need to study the human-oriented economy; establishes horizontal and vertical economic relations in the economic system; discovers the specific aspects of horizontal economic relations through the interaction between the spheres of a human-oriented economy; identifies normal and pathological restriction relations.
Methods. This study uses scientific methods of cognition, namely content analysis and the Wuxing Pentagram.
Results. Horizontal relations between the defining spheres of a human-oriented economy are determined. The resource (human needs) that ensures interaction between the spheres of the economic system under consideration is identified. Normal restriction relations are described: natural-material sphere — information-digital sphere, information-digital sphere — cognitive sphere, cognitive sphere — social-service sphere, social-service sphere — creatosphere, creatosphere — natural-material sphere. Pathological restriction relations are detected: informationdigital sphere — natural-material sphere, cognitive sphere — information-digital sphere, socialservice sphere — cognitive sphere, creatosphere — social-service sphere, natural-material sphere — creatosphere.
Conclusions. Examination of restriction relations in a human-oriented economy provides insight into the directions for the regulation of the corresponding economic system, which, according to the author, will ensure not only personal, but also economic growth.
About the Author
S. I. Nasyrova
Institute of Education Development of the Republic of Bashkortostan; Bashkir State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana I. Nasyrova, Ph.D. in Economics, Vice-Rector for Research and Innovation1, Associate Professor of the Department of Project Management and Marketing
120 Mingazheva Str., Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan 450005, Russia
32 Zaki Validi Str., Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan 450076, Russia
References
1. Bukht R., Heeks R. Defining, conceptualising and measuring the digital economy. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2017. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3431732
2. Suslov V.I., ed. Development of an innovative economy: Analysis, methods and models. Novosibirsk: Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of the Siberian Branch of RAS; 2020. 440 p. (In Russ.).
3. Didenko D.V. Intellectual economy: Human capital in Russian and in world socio-economic development. St. Petersburg: Aleteiya; 2015. 408 p. (In Russ.).
4. Powell W.W., Snellman K. The knowledge economy. Annual Review of Sociology. 2004;30:199- 220. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100037
5. Sukhodolov A.P., Popkova E.G., Litvinova T.N. Basic characteristics of information economy. In: Models of modern information economy: Conceptual contradictions and practical examples. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Ltd; 2018:17-24. DOI: 10.1108/978-1-78756-287-520181003
6. Kačerauskas T. Creative economy and the idea of the creative society. Transformations in Business & Economics. 2020;19(1):43-52. URL: https://www.culturalstudiesinbusiness.org/post/creative-economy-and-the-idea-of-the-creative-society (accessed on 17.07.2021).
7. Mamedov G., Babych N. Green economy: Global development priorities. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. 2020;6(1):87-91. DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-1-87-91
8. Stahel W.R. The circular economy. Nature. 2016;531(7595):435-438. DOI: 10.1038/531435a
9. Puschmann T., Alt R. Sharing economy. Business & Information Systems Engineering. 2016;58(1):93-99. DOI: 10.1007/s12599-015-0420-2
10. Boyarkin A.V., Pitaikina I.A. Formation of the theory of public health in a human-centered economy. Evraziiskii soyuz uchenykh = Eurasian Union of Scientists. 2015;(4-1):50-53. (In Russ.).
11. Prokin V.V. Integral modeling of economy man and human economy. Novye idei v filosofii. 1998;(7):137-143. (In Russ.).
12. Gairbekov M.S., Gunasheva Z.Ya. Economic man or human economy: An attempt to bring together rationality and humanism. Izvestiya Chechenskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo instituta = Bulletin of Chechen State Pedagogical University. 2017;15(2):225-230. (In Russ.).
13. Fedorenko N.P. Humanistic economics. Moscow: Ekonomika; 2006. 188 p. (In Russ.).
14. McCloskey D. Economics with a human face, or humanomics. Transl. from Eng. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ekonomika = St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies (SUJES). 2013;(3):37-40. (In Russ.).
15. Novosadov S.A. Humanonomics as a new stage in the development of socio-economic relations. Moscow: National Research Nuclear University MEPHI; 2020. 267 p. (In Russ.).
16. Pletnyov D.A. Economy for the human as a nontrivial aim of contemporary economy development. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = CSU Bulletin. 2013; (15):35-42. (In Russ.).
17. Lau L.J. Economic relations between China and the U.S. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies. 2020;17(4):1-37. DOI: 10.1080/14765284.2020.1712887
18. Hutchinson F.E., Bhattacharya P. Singapore-Malaysia economic relations: Deep interdependence. ISEAS Perspective. 2019;(2):1-11. URL: https://www.iseas.edu.sg/images/pdf/ISEAS_Perspective_2019_2.pdf (accessed on 17.07.2021).
19. Roohi M., Shafiee N., Dehshiri M., Hajimineh R. Theory of realism and synchronization of Russia-Turkey economic and political relations improvement. Strategic Studies of Public Policy. 2019;9(32):44-64.
20. Nasyrova S.I. Inter-Component Relations in a Human-Centered Economy (Part 1). Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management. 2021;27(8):612-621 (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2021-8-612-621
21. Boush G.D., Razumov V.I. Research methodology (in candidate and doctoral dissertations). Moscow: INFRA-M; 2020. 227 p. (In Russ.).
22. Motul’skii R.S. Library as a social institution. Minsk: Belarusian State University of Culture; 2002. 374 p. (In Russ.).
23. Voskresenskii A.K., Khlebnikov G.V. The structure of information on philosophy in the system of the Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of RAS. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvenno-nauchnoi informatsii. 2014;(22):184-192. (In Russ.).
24. Chandy K.M. The scientist’s infosphere. IEEE Computational Science and Engineering. 1996;3(2):43-44. DOI: 10.1109/99.503311
25. Glushchenko V., Glushchenko I. Paradigm of formation of scientific providing sphere of post industrial services. Byulleten’ nauki i praktiki = Bulletin of Science and Practice. 2017;(10):228-243. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1012389
26. Abramov E.G. The fourth wave or creative economy as an economic era at the beginning of the XXI century. Rossiiskoe predprinimatel’stvo = Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship. 2012;(2):72-78. (In Russ.).
27. Melnikov O.N., Larionov V.G., Gankin N.A. Areas of responsibility in the conceptual development of “creative economy” and “creative industries”. Kreativnaya ekonomika = Journal of Creative Economy. 2015;9(3):265-278. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Nasyrova S.I. Inter-Component Relations in a Human-Centered Economy (Part 2). Economics and Management. 2021;27(9):687-696. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2021-9-687-696
Views:
350
