Goal-setting technique in a logistics service system: Overcoming the limitations of the technocratic approach to key performance indicators
https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2026-1-49-58
Abstract
Aim. This work aimed to investigate the issue of defining the boundaries of key performance indicators (KPIs) for a logistics service evaluation system.
Objectives. The work seeks to analyze and systematize existing approaches to defining KPI boundary values for small entrepreneurship logistics service systems; to propose a conceptual model for defining KPI boundary values based on the dynamic interaction between the logistics system development and decision-maker transformation; to identify and characterize the driving forces of the goal-setting process through development of practical recommendations for managing them to ensure sustainable development.
Methods. The study employed a set of methodological approaches, namely comparative and critical analysis, interdisciplinary synthesis, conceptual modeling, and qualitative case study analysis.
Results. A concept of the existential-managerial nature of goal-setting has been developed, demonstrating that defining the KPI boundaries of a logistics service system is not a technicaleconomic, but a psychological-managerial task. The application of an interdisciplinary analogy with the multiworld interpretation of quantum physics is substantiated, allowing the management process to be modeled as a sequence of irreversible «branchings of reality». The cyclical nature of the mutual interaction between goal achievement and decision-maker transformation has been established. Three key driving forces of goal-setting were identified and systematized, which are ambition, greed, and mindfulness. The work discovered a critical point where healthy ambitions transition to greed, which determines the vector of a company’s development. It also demonstrated the impossibility of creating a universal mathematical formula for calculating ideal KPI boundaries for a logistics service system due to the predominance of psychological aspects over formal algorithms.
Conclusions. The KPI boundaries of a logistics service system represent not a technical and economic task, but an existential and managerial one, in which psychological aspects prevail over mathematical calculations. A cyclical interaction between the logistics system development and the transformation of decision makers has been established. It was substantiated that the KPI system effectiveness is determined by the balance of three opposing forces, which are ambition, greed, and mindfulness. The concept of «conscious stability» has been developed as an alternative development path focused on qualitative process improvement rather than quantitative growth. The work provides recommendations for practical application.
About the Author
O. A. ElaginaRussian Federation
Olga A. Elagina, PhD in Economics, Associate Professor,
Associate Professor at the Department of Information Technology in Public Administration
78 Vernadsky Ave., Moscow 119454
Competing Interests:
the author declares no conflict of interest related to the publication of this article
References
1. Krylov S.I. Development of the methodology of analysis in the balanced scorecard. Moscow: Finansy i statistika; 2021. 152 p. (In Russ.).
2. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1996. 336 p. (Russ. ed.: Kaplan R., Norton D. Sbalansirovannaya sistema pokazatelei: Ot strategii k deistviyu. Moscow: Olymp-Business; 2003. 214 p.).
3. Waters D. Supply chain management: An introduction to logistics. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan; 2000. 384 p. (Russ. ed.: Waters D. Logistika: upravlenie tsep’yu postavok. Moscow: Yuniti-Dana; 2003. 503 p.).
4. Bowersox D.J., Closs D.J. Logistical management: The integrated supply chain process. Singapore; New York: McGraw-Hill Co.; 1996. 730 p. (Russ. ed.: Bowersox D.J., Closs D.J. Logistika: integrirovannaya tsep’ postavok. Moscow: Olymp-Business; 2006. 639 p.).
5. Christopher M. Logistics and supply chain management: Strategies for reducing cost and improving service. Harlow: Financial Times/Prentice-Hall; 1998. 328 p. (Russ. ed.: Christopher M. Logistika i upravlenie tsepochkami postavok: kak sokratit’ zatraty i uluchshit’ obsluzhivanie potrebitelei. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2004. 315 p.).
6. Goldratt E.M., Cox J. The goal: A process of ongoing improvement. Great Barrington: North River Press; 2010. 362 p. (Russ. ed.: Goldratt E.M., Cox J. Tsel’: protsess nepreryvnogo uluchsheniya. Moscow: Sberbank; 2012. 415 p.).
7. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux; 2011. 499 p. (Russ. ed.: Kahneman D. Dumai medlenno… reshai bystro. Moscow: AST; 2011. 656 p.).
8. Ariely D. Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York, London: Harper Perennial; 2010. 380 p. (Russ. ed.: Ariely D. Predskazuemaya irratsional’nost’: skrytye sily, opredelyayushchie nashi resheniya. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber; 2010. 320 p.).
9. Frankl V.E. The doctor and the soul: From psychotherapy to logotherapy. New York, NY: Vintage Books; 1973. 318 p.; Frankl V.E. The will to meaning: Foundations and applications of logotherapy. New York, NY: Penguin Books USA Inc.; 1969. 179 p.; Frankl V.E. The unheard cry for meaning: Psychotherapy and humanism. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster; 1978. 191 p.; Frankl V.E. Logotherapie und Existenzanalyse: Texte aus fünf Jahrzehnten. München, Zürich: Piper Taschenbuch; 1987. 184 p.; Frankl V.E. Der Mensch vor der Frage nach dem Sinn: Eine Auswahl aus dem Gesamtwerk. München, Zürich: Piper Taschenbuch; 1979. 292 p. (Russ. ed.: Frankl V. Chelovek v poiskakh smysla: sbornik. Moscow: Progress; 1990. 368 p.).
10. Byrne P. The many worlds of Hugh Everett. Scientific American. 2008;297(6):72-79. https:// doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1207-98 (Russ. ed.: Byrne P. Mnozhestvennost’ mirov Kh’yu Everetta. V mire nauki. 2008;(3):69-75.).
Review
For citations:
Elagina O.A. Goal-setting technique in a logistics service system: Overcoming the limitations of the technocratic approach to key performance indicators. Economics and Management. 2026;32(1):49-58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2026-1-49-58
JATS XML

















