Modern approaches to application of newest technologies and their role in the innovative development of enterprises in the regions of Russia

Aim. The work aimed to conduct system analysis of modern approaches to application of newest technologies by enterprises in the regions of the Russian Federation (RF), as well as develop recommendations for the formation of effective models of their technological updating, taking into account regional and industry specifics.

Objectives. The work seeks to characterize modern approaches and tools for application of new technologies by enterprises in the regions of the Russian Federation and assess their impact on innovative development; to identify key criteria for assessing the level of application of newest technologies, and conduct an empirical analysis of the levels of technology application in different regions of the country; to develop recommendations for considering regional characteristics and determining effective models of technology application to ensure the innovative development of enterprises in the regions of the Russian Federation.

Methods. The study employed a comparative analysis of regional characteristics influencing the choice of a technological renewal model and an assessment of significance of the criteria identified. The study is based on an analysis of published scientific papers and statistical information.

Results. The empirical study results revealed regional differentiation in the application of technologies, with regions with a developed urban environment and a solid scientific base leading. The importance of taking into account regional characteristics when choosing optimal models of technological renewal is demonstrated. It is argued that it is necessary to develop comprehensive methodological approaches combining technological, institutional, and evolutionary aspects of the application of newest technologies by enterprises at the regional level.

Conclusions. The study confirmed significant regional differences in the technological development of Russian enterprises. The work substantiates the need for a differentiated approach combining adaptive models of technology application (innovation ecosystems for leaders, strengthening public-private partnerships for middle-market companies, infrastructure programs for outsiders) with a key role of public-private-scientific synergy, which will reduce disproportions and ensure sustainable innovative growth

1. Ignatieva E.A. Analysis of the practice of using creative technologies in education. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta = Vestnik of Minin University. 2024;12(1):2. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2024-12-1-2

2. Tronina I.A., Semenikhina A.V., Morozova O.I., Kolmykova T.S. Infrastructure projects as a driver of economic development of the regional system. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Sotsiologiya. Menedzhment = Proceedings of South-West State University. Series Economics. Sociology. Management. 2024;14(3):101- 113. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2024-14-3-101-113

3. Bobryshev A.D., Tarabrin K.M., Tumin V.M., et al. Building modern business models in industry. 2nd ed. Moscow: INFRA-M; 2024. 287 p. (In Russ.).

4. Kuznetsova S.N., Kuznetsov V.P., Kozlova E.P., et al. Development and Implementation of mechanisms for sustainable economic development of industrial parks. In: Popkova E.G., ed. Corporate social responsibility to the green growth of business and economy. Cham: Springer; 2025:223-227. (Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-83041-9_37

5. Bantos S.A. The definition of “territorial development” in the economic context and approaches to its formalization. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship. 2024;(9):687-690. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34925/EIP.2024.170.9.123

6. Mityakov E., Kulikova N., Ladynin A., et al. Industrial ecosystems sustainable development management conceptual model. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review. 2025;5(2):e04038. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n02.pe04038

7. Nizhegorodtsev R.M., Goridko N.P. Instruments for industrial modernization and economic policies. Drukerovskii vestnik. 2025;(1):273-287. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17213/2312-6469-2025-1-273-287

8. Laskova D.S., Kosolapova N.A., Ponomareva M.A., Papushenko M.V. Industry 5.0: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development of Russian industry. Journal of Economic Regulation. 2024;15(1):76-88. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17835/2078-5429.2024.15.1.076-088

9. Safargaliev M.F., Yusupova I.V., Seleznev D.K. On support and modern approaches to the creation of industrial clusters as ecosystems of organizing distributed production. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoi akademii nauk = Izvestiya of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023;25(6):60-67. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37313/1990-5378-2023-25-6-60-67

10. Lapaev D.N. Multi-projection optimization model for comparative assessment of economic systems. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost’ = Economic Security. 2025;8(1):89-104. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18334/ecsec.8.1.122496

11. Zelentsova L.S., Efimova N.S., Jamai E.V., Soshnikov A.V. information and organizational support for the mechanism of competitive selection of innovation projects at high-tech enterprises. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya = Economics and Management: Problems, Solutions. 2024;3(7):30-37. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2024.07.03.004

12. Gokhberg L., Roud V. Measuring innovation in Russia: New challenges and solutions. Foresight and STI Governance. 2023;17(1):6-15. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2023.1.6.15

13. Radosevic S., Yoruk E. Why do we need a theory and metrics of technology upgrading? Asian Journal of Technology Innovation. 2016;24:8-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2016.12 07415