Preview

Economics and Management

Advanced search

Transformation of mortgage lending in early to mid-2020s and its impact on the Russian economy

https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2025-6-760-769

Abstract

Aim. The work aimed to develop the conception of subsidized mortgage products and their role in the transformation of the mortgage lending paradigm in the Russian Federation (RF) in early to mid-2020s.
Objectives. The work seeks to determine the key stages in the development of subsidized mortgage products in Russia; to identify the specific risks of subsidized mortgage products for borrowers and credit institutions; to assess the impact of subsidized mortgages on the credit and financial system, the construction industry, as well as the affordability of housing in Russia.
Methods. The study employed general scientific research methods, such as analysis, comparison, analogy and scientific abstraction, as methodological tools. The study was based on the analysis of regulatory and legal acts of the Russian Federation, reports of the Bank of Russia and the financial institution for development in the housing sector of Russia, DOM.RF, addressed to mortgage lending issues. The empirical base of the study consisted of the data of the Bank of Russia and DOM.RF, posted on their official Internet portals.
Results. Despite the high socio-economic significance, subsidized mortgages have not received sufficient attention in the works of Russian scientists. Scientific works are mainly focused on studying the conditions and effectiveness of state-subsidized soft-window mortgage programs. The objective necessity for a comprehensive study of the impact of subsidized mortgages on the Russian economy determined the relevance of this article. The author attempted to develop ideas about subsidized mortgage products and their impact on the construction industry, the credit and financial system, and the population of Russia. The institutional foundations were studied, as well as the key stages of the development of subsidized mortgages were identified. The article presents the economic mechanism of formation of near-zero rates on “soft-window mortgage from the developer”, as well as the impact of subsidized mortgage on the distortion of fair value in the primary real estate market. Delayed side effects of bulk soft-window and subsidized mortgages in the short and medium term were revealed.
Conclusions. Subsidized mortgages did not induce an increase in the availability of either housing or mortgage loans, but enabled developers to ensure additional sales, thereby stimulating the functioning of the construction and related industries in the short and medium term. The bulk soft-window mortgages with state support achieved their goal as a short-term anti-crisis measure, serving as a prime engine of the development of housing construction in all regions of the Russian Federation. However, it is currently not possible to assess objectively its impact on the economy due to the limited period of the study.

About the Author

T. A. Yakovleva
St. Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics
Russian Federation

Tatyana A. Yakovleva, PhD in Economics, Associate Professor at the Department of International Finance and Accounting 

44A Lermontovskiy Ave., St. Petersburg 190020


Competing Interests:

The author declares no conflict of interest related to the publication of this article.



References

1. On mortgage (pledge of real estate). Federal Law of July 16, 1998 No. 102-FZ. Konsul’tantPlyus. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_19396/?ysclid=mamncbrn ql351188128 (accessed on 30.01.2025). (In Russ.).

2. On approval of the Rules for reimbursement to credit and other organizations of lost income on housing (mortgage) loans (credits) issued to citizens of the Russian Federation in 2020–2024. RF Government Resolution of April 23, 2020 No. 566 (as amended on April 23, 2020) (no longer in effect). Konsul’tantPlyus. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_351097/437e6180590893bf1d66cadb6f292ec6d13c0b25/?ysclid=mamne2b8l5325767947 (accessed on 30.01.2025). (In Russ.).

3. Indicators of the housing (mortgage housing) lending market. Bank of Russia. URL: https://cbr.ru/statistics/bank_sector/mortgage/?utm_source=w&utm_content=page#a_62947 (accessed on 24.04.2025). (In Russ.).4. Review of financial market risks: information and analytical material. 2024;(1). Bank of Russia. URL: https://cbr.ru/Collection/Collection/File/48852/ORFR_2024-01.pdf (accessed on 24.02.2025). (In Russ.).

4. Preferential mortgages accelerated the growth of housing prices. Bank of Russia. Feb. 09,

5. URL: https://cbr.ru/press/regevent/?id=44602 (accessed on 12.04.2025). (In Russ.).

6. Standard for the protection of rights and legitimate interests of mortgage borrowers (agreed by the Bank of Russia on September 26, 2024). Konsul’tantPlyus. URL: https://www.con-sultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_486623/?ysclid=mamiwsa9ce217149539 (accessed on 30.04.2025). (In Russ.).

7. Housing affordability in cities, urban agglomerations and regions of Russia. Institute of Urban Economics. URL: https://www.urbaneconomics.ru/sites/default/files/dostupnost_ zhilya_v_rossii_2024.pdf (accessed on 01.04.2025). (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Yakovleva T.A. Transformation of mortgage lending in early to mid-2020s and its impact on the Russian economy. Economics and Management. 2025;31(6):760-769. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2025-6-760-769

Views: 9


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-1627 (Print)