Modern approaches to the selection of indicators for assessing the quality of life of the population of the region, having consideration for the impact of digital transformation processes

   Aim. The work aimed to identify the features, advantages and disadvantages of the methods for assessing the quality of life of the population, applied in the Russian Federation (RF), and to propose a set of indicators for assessing the quality of life of the population, having consideration for the processes of digital transformation of the economy and society.

   Objectives. The work seeks to justify the need to develop a method for assessing the quality of life of the population, having consideration for the processes of digital transformation; to conduct a comparative description of the methods for assessing the quality of life of the population of the Russian Federation, to identify their advantages and disadvantages; to propose a set of indicators for assessing the quality of life of the population, taking into account regional specifics and digitalization conditions.

   Methods. The authors used general scientific methods (classifications, system and comparative analysis, scientific synthesis). The study information base was composed of methods for assessing the population quality of life, applied at the regional level in Russia (Institute for Problems of Regional Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Russian Public Opinion Research Center, Rosstat).

   Results. A comparative analysis of the methods for assessing the quality of life of the population, applied in Russia, was performed to reveal their advantages and disadvantages in the context of digitalization of the economy and society. A set of indicators for assessing the quality of life of the population at the regional level in the context of digital transformation is proposed, including groups of indicators determining the level and structure of income and consumption; the state of the labor market and employment; availability and quality of social services; housing conditions; development of digital infrastructure; environmental well-being. The regional specificity of the proposed indicators was characterized. The work also discussed the process of influence of digitalization conditions on various aspects of life of the population, assessed using the proposed indicators.

   Conclusions. Monitoring of the indicators of the population quality of life, taking into account the impact of digitalization, is as an important tool for substantiating and improving the effectiveness of regional socio-economic policy.

1. Basova S.N. On the issue of assessing the standard and quality of life of the population: Regional aspect. In: Baikov N.M., Berezutskii Yu.V., Polivaeva O.G., eds. Poverty as a phenomenon of scientific knowledge and a subject of public administration : Materials of the round table (Khabarovsk, September 28, 2020). Khabarovsk: Far Eastern Institute of Management – branch of RANEPA; 2020:11-20. (In Russ.).

2. Avduevskaya E.A. Comparative analysis of methods for assessing the life quality of the population of the region level. Dnevnik nauki. 2023;(9):25. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.51691/2541-8327-2023-9-3

3. Standard of living. Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat). URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/13397 (accessed on 18. 01. 2025). (In Russ.).

4. Demyanova A.V. Statistical measurement of the impact of digitalization of the economy on employment. Moscow: Institute for Statistical Research and Economics of Knowledge; 2021. 12 p. URL: rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/ryCC4yXJ/Demyanova.pdf (accessed on 18. 01. 2025). (In Russ.).

5. Gagulina N.L. Analysis of the quality of life in the context of global problems of our time. In: Okrepilov V.V., Kuznetsov S.V., eds. Problems of transformation and regulation of regional socio-economic systems : Coll. sci. pap. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation; 2022;(50):4-16. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.52897/978-5-8088-1783-8-2022-50-4-16

6. Okrepilov V.V. The role of quality economics in the sustainability of innovative development. In: Problems of transformation and regulation of regional socio-economic systems : Coll. sci. pap. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation; 2022;(50):113-124. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.52897/978-5-8088-1783-8-2022-50-113-124

7. Okrepilov V.V., ed. Socio-economic development of regions. Moscow: Nauka; 2024. 492 p. (In Russ.).

8. Goryunova A.A. Concept of development of innovation center in Leningrad region. Vestnik nauki. 2024;4(4):736-754. (In Russ.).

9. Litvintseva G.P., Karelin I.N. Digital inequality and quality of life of the population in the regions of the Russian Federation. In: The impact of the digital transformation of the economy on the quality of life of the population: Theory, assessments, regulation. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Technical University Publ.; 2021:67-79. (In Russ.).

10. Panov A.V., Feoktistova T.V. Digital economy and its impact on quality of life. In: Economy today: Current state and development prospects (Vector-2022). Proc. All-Russ. sci. conf. of young researchers with int. particip. (Moscow, May 25, 2022). Pt. 4. Moscow: Russian State University named after A.N. Kosygin; 2022:18-21. (In Russ.).