Modeling the management of organizational projects in the field of environmental sustainability: Methodological approaches and comparative analysis of the experience of Iran and Turkey
https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2025-2-160-170
Abstract
Aim. The work aimed to assess the management effectiveness of organizational projects in the field of environmental sustainability in Iran and Turkey, as well as to develop methodological approaches that combine policy mechanisms, financial incentives, and public participation to optimize the implementation of sustainable development initiatives.
Objectives. The work seeks to identify the key indicators of sustainable development; conduct a comparative analysis of national strategies; and characterize the use of structural modeling (SEM) to assess the effectiveness of policies.
Methods. The work employed structural modeling (SEM), comparative and correlation analysis, as well as statistical data processing. The information was collected from government reports, international environmental organizations and expert surveys. The analysis was performed using the SPSS and AMOS software packages to model the interdependencies between sustainable development factors.
Results. The analysis performed in the course of the study enables to conclude that Turkey demonstrates a more structured and proactive approach to sustainable development, especially in the field of implementation of renewable energy sources and digital management technologies. However, Iran faces challenges due to limited financial support and disadvantages in enforcement practices. The SEM analysis confirms the importance of an integrated sustainable development model and reveals that successful outcomes depend on a balanced combination of policy regulation, financial mechanisms, and public participation strategies.
Conclusions. Strengthening regulatory frameworks, integrating digital technologies into environmental management, and expanding alternative financing mechanisms such as green bonds are required to improve the effectiveness of sustainable development projects in Iran and Turkey. Achieving long-term environmental balance will be possible through the transition to an ecosystem approach and greater private sector participation in sustainable development initiatives.
About the Author
N. MahmoudiRussian Federation
Niloufar Mahmoudi, PhD in Biology, postgraduate student on the specialty “Management in Organizational Systems”, Department of Innovative Management in the Industries of the Engineering Academy
6 Miklukho-Maklaya st., Moscow 117198, Russia
Competing Interests:
The author declares no conflict of interest related to the publication of this article.
References
1. Renewable energy market analysis: GCC 2019. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA); 2019. 154 p. URL: https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2019/Jan/IRENA_Market_Analysis_GCC_2019.pdf (accessed on 02.02.2025).
2. Circular economy in Europe: Developing the knowledge base. EEA Report. 2016;(2). URL: https://www.socialistsanddemocrats.eu/sites/default/files/Circular%20economy%20in%20Europe.pdf (accessed on 02.02.2025).
3. Human development report 2020: The next frontier — human development and the Anthropocene. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme; 2020. 412 p. URL: https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/hdr2020.pdf (accessed on 02.02.2025).
4. Marchau V.A.W.J., Walker W.E., Bloemen P.J.T.M., Popper S.W., eds. Decision making under deep uncertainty: From theory to practice. Cham: Springer-Verlag; 2019; 405 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-05252-2
5. Paunovic I., Müller C., Deimel K. Citizen participation for sustainability and resilience: A generational cohort perspective on community brand identity perceptions and development priorities in a rural community. Sustainability. 2023;15(9):7307. DOI: 10.3390/su15097307
6. Borhani F., Motlagh M.S., Ehsani A., Rashidi Y. Evaluation of short-lived atmospheric fine particles in Tehran, Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 2022;15:1398. DOI: 10.1007/s12517-022-10667-5
7. Eden S. Public participation in environmental policy: Considering scientific, counter-scientific and non-scientific contributions. Public Understanding of Science. 1996;5(3):183-204. DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/5/3/001
8. Tawiah V., Zakari A., Adedoyin F.F. Determinants of green growth in developed and developing countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021;28(29):39227-39242. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-13429-0
9. Farajzadeh Z., Ghorbanian E., Tarazkar M. H. The shocks of climate change on economic growth in developing economies: Evidence from Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022;372:133687. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133687
10. Schneider S., Spieth P., Clauss T. Business model innovation in the aviation industry. International Journal of Product Development. 2013;18(3-4):286-310. DOI: 10.1504/IJPD.2013.055010
11. Osterwalder A. The business model ontology: A proposition in a design science approach. PhD thesis. Lausanne: Université de Lausanne; 2004. 172 p. URL: https://www.academia.edu/download/30373644/thebusinessmodelontology.pdf (accessed on 02.02.2025).
12. Busch T., Bruce-Clark P., Derwall J., et al. Impact investments: A call for (re)orientation. SN Business & Economics. 2021;1(2):33. DOI: 10.1007/s43546-020-00033-6
13. Manuel M., Lightfoot D., Fattahi M. The sustainability of ancient water control techniques in Iran. Water History. 2018;10(1):13-30. DOI: 10.1007/s12685-017-0200-7
14. Ediger V.Ş. Climate change and sustainable energy in Turkey. İstanbul: ENIVA Publications; 2013. 146 p.
15. Novikov S.V., Solodova A.D. Key trends in the aviation industry: Digital economy and new technologies. Gumanitarnye, sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki = Humanities, Social-Economic and Social Sciences. 2018;(5):276-278. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.23672/SAE.2018.5.14156
16. On currency regulation and currency control. Federal law of December 10, 2003 No. 173-FZ. Konsul’tantPlyus. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_45458/ (accessed on 10.02.2025). (In Russ.).
17. Mahmoudi N. Indicators of efficiency for environmental NGOs in promoting environmental sustainability in Iran. In: Contemporary research in the context of global transformation. Proc. 3rd Int. sci.-pract. conf. (Petrozavodsk, September 02, 2024). Petrozavodsk: Novaya nauka; 2024:73-79. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.46916/04092024-978-5-00215-512-5
18. Global energy review 2021: Assessing the effects of economic recoveries on global energy demand and CO₂ emissions in 2021. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2021. 36 p. URL: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/d0031107-401d-4a2f-a48b-9eed19457335/GlobalEnergyReview2021.pdf (accessed on 02.02.2025).
19. Tonyaloğlu E.E. Future land use/land cover and its impacts on ecosystem services: Case of Aydın, Turkey. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2025;22(2):4601-4617. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-024-05907-y
20. Kaya E.B., Erbaş İ. The relationship between urban transformation and sustainability: A bibliometric analysis and exploring existing trends. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. 2024;23(5):1756-1775. DOI: 10.1080/13467581.2023.2270033
Review
For citations:
Mahmoudi N. Modeling the management of organizational projects in the field of environmental sustainability: Methodological approaches and comparative analysis of the experience of Iran and Turkey. Economics and Management. 2025;31(2):160-170. https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2025-2-160-170