Human-oriented economy: The research problem statement
https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2024-11-1323-1333
Abstract
Aim. The work aimed to formulate the main research problem in the context of human-oriented economy, which key role is assigned to a human being and the satisfaction of their needs.
Objectives. The work seeks to reveal the relationship between human-oriented economy and the humanization of the economic system, to identify human-oriented economy using the black-box diagram, and to indicate the research problem for further investigation.
Methods. The authors used the scientific knowledge methods, namely the method of constructing concepts and the black-box diagram.
Results. The work presents the relationship between a human-oriented economy and the economic system humanization (a human-oriented economy is based on the principles of its humanization, aimed at producing reasonably required goods for the full development of a human, based on their triple nature). The work also determines the nature of the possible influence of humanization on a human-oriented economy (coincidence/confrontation of the ideologies of these phenomena). In addition, the understanding of a human-oriented economy is revealed using the black-box diagram (black box is a human-oriented economy, input parameters are human needs, output signals are satisfaction of needs, an inverter system is components of a human-oriented economy). The research problem is presented in relation to a human-oriented economy, while its solution will contribute to the human development and the economic system as a whole.
Conclusions. The research problem stated sets a benchmark for further study of the essence and nature of a human-oriented economy in order to construct its full-fledged theory.
About the Authors
S. I. Nasyrova
Ufa University of Science and Technology
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Svetlana I. Nasyrova - PhD in Economics, Associate Professor at the Department of Strategic Management
32 Zaki Walidi st., Ufa 450076
Competing Interests:
the authors declare no conflict of interest
related to the publication of this article
L. A. Mierin
St. Petersburg State University of Economics
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Larisa A. Mierin - D.Sc. in Economics, Professor, Professor at the specialized department of PAO Gazprom
21 Sadovaya st., St. Petersburg 191023
Competing Interests:
the authors declare no conflict of interest
related to the publication of this article
References
1. Aslanov D.I. Humanist paradigm of market economy. Kreativnaya ekonomika = Journal of Creative Economy. 2011;(10):50-55. (In Russ.).
2. Ismailova M.F. Innovative potential of a human-worker as a factor of the humanization of economy. In: Proc. 55th Int. sci. conf. on economic and social development (Baku, June 18-19, 2020). Varazdin: Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency; 2020: 334-337.
3. Mierin’ L.A. Humanistic orientation of transformations as a strategic benchmark for the development of the Russian economy. In: Global conflict and contours of the new world order. Proc. 20th Int. Likhachev sci. readings (St. Petersburg, June 9-10, 2022). St. Petersburg: Saint-Petersburg University of the Humanities and Social Sciences; 2022:355-357. (In Russ.).
4. Svitačová E.P. Place and tasks of ethics in humanization of economics. In: International scientific days 2018: Towards productive, sustainable and resilient global agriculture and food systems: Conf. proc. Prague: Wolters Kluwer ČR; 2018:2060-2071. DOI: 10.15414/isd2018.s9.17
5. Ivanová P. Business environment and humanization of economy in 21st century. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2016. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2741137
6. Naisbitt J. High tech, high touch: Technology and our search for meaning. New York, NY: Broadway Books Publishing; 1999. 274 p. (Russ. ed.: Naisbit J. Vysokaya tekhnologiya, glubokaya gumannost’: tekhnologii i nashi poiski smysla. Moscow: AST; Tranzitkniga; 2005. 381 p.).
7. Ketova N.P., Ovchinnikov V.N. Humanization of the economy of the North Caucasus is a vector of sustainable development of the region. Sotsial’naya ekonomika. 2013;(1):116-122. (In Russ.).
8. Arutyunova A.E., Smirnova E.V. The essence and content of humanization as a sign of the process of innovative development of the economy. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk = International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2019; (7-1):177-180. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2500-1000-2019-11396
9. Voronkova O., Hordei O., Barusman A.R.P., Ghani E.K. Social integration as a direction for humanization of economic relations and improvement of social welfare. SocioEconomic Challenges. 2019;3(4):52-62. DOI: 10.21272/sec.3(4).52-62.2019
10. Samylina V.V. Problems of humanization of economic growth in the system of relations of social reproduction. Cand. econ. sci. diss. Synopsis. Krasnodar: Kuban State University; 2006. 25 p. (In Russ.).
11. Mironova I.G. Humanization of economic growth: Essence, factors, key directions. Cand. econ. sci. diss. Synopsis. Saratov: Saratov State Social and Economic University; 2010. 25 p. (In Russ.).
12. Asadov B.R. The role of non-governmental actors in the process of humanitarization of the world economy (case of youth organizations and institutions). Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki = Problems of Modern Economics. 2013;(3):175-180. (In Russ.).
13. Komkov N.I., Sutyagin V.V., Volodina N.N. Humanization of the Russian economy as a factor in its development and ensuring socio-political security. Rossiya: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya. 2019;(14-1):107-112. (In Russ.).
14. Sutyagin V.V., Volodina N.N., Lazarev A.A. Expediency of a humanization of economy at development of the Arctic. Ekonomika i sotsium: sovremennye modeli razvitiya = Economics & Society: Contemporary Models of Development. 2018;8(3):94-115. (In Russ.).
15. Vernadskii V.I. Biosphere and noosphere. Moscow: Airis-Press; 2004. 576 p. (In Russ.).
16. Nysh M.S. Humanization as the main trend of the 21st century economy. In: Kharakhnin K.A., ed. Cherepovets scientific readings – 2017. Proc. All-Russ. sci.-pract. conf. (Cherepovets, November 21-22, 2017). In 3 pts. Pt. 3. Cherepovets: Cherepovets State University; 2018:167- 170. (In Russ.).
17. Salikhova I.S. Qualitative integrity of humanization of modern economy. In: Semenov A.V., Malyshev N.G., eds. Sustainable development: Society, ecology, economy. Proc. 15th Int. sci. conf. (Moscow, March 28, 2019). In 4 pts. Pt. 3. Moscow: Moscow Witte University; 2019:394-403. (In Russ.).
18. Makeeva E.S. The role of cultural heritage in the humanization of the modern economy. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Economics; 2020. 75 p. (In Russ.).
19. Salikhova I.S. Imperatives and value-semantic quality of modern economy. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta im. S.Yu. Vitte. Seriya 1: Ekonomika i upravlenie = Moscow Witte University Bulletin. Series 1: Economics and Management. 2019;(1):7-14. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21777/2587-554X-2019-1-7-14
20. Zelenskaya O.A. Humanization of the economy and industrial modernization. Gumanizatsiya obrazovaniya = Humanization of Education. 2011;(1):87-92. (In Russ.).
21. Kulikov M.N. Humanization of economy as factor of transition of Russia to the new quality of economical growth. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Vestnik of Saratov State Technical University. 2007;4(1):185-190. (In Russ.).
22. Chernykh Yu.V. Economic content of humanization. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika = Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Economics. 2016;(2):38-43. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18384/2310-6646-2016-2-38-43
23. Chernysheva E.N. Prospects for an interdisciplinary approach in economic science. Vestnik Rossiiskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta im. G.V. Plekhanova. Vstuplenie. Put’ v nauku = The REU Bulletin. Introduction. The Road to Science. 2013;(1):85-90. (In Russ.).
24. Salikhov B.V. The methodology of the system paradigm and the cognitive aspects of a modern economy humanization. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta im. S.Yu. Vitte. Seriya 1: Ekonomika i upravlenie = Moscow Witte University Bulletin. Series 1: Economics and Management. 2019;(2):7-15. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21777/2587-554X-2019-2-7-15
25. Svetlov V.A. Practical logic. St. Petersburg: Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy; 1995. 472 p. (In Russ.).
26. Boush G D., Razumov V.I. Methodology of scientific research (in candidate and doctoral dissertations). Moscow: Infra-M; 2020. 227 p. (In Russ.).
27. Ashby W.R. An introduction to cybernetics. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1956. 320 p. (Russ. ed.: Ashby W.R. Vvedenie v kibernetiku. Moscow: Foreign Literature Publ.; 1959. 432 p.).
28. Aitbagina E.R. Model of the “black box” type of the motor transport system of cargo transportation. In: Actual problems of science and technology through the eyes of young scientists. Proc. Int. sci.-pract. conf. (Omsk, February 8-9, 2016). Omsk: Siberian State Automobile and Highway University; 2016;479-483. (In Russ.).
29. Safonov K.B. Humanization of social management: Main directions and priorities. In: Tarasov A.N., ed. Humanitarianism in the context of modern socio-cultural transformation. Proc. 8th All-Russ. sci.-pract. conf. with int. particip. Lipetsk: Lipetsk State Pedagogical University named after P.P. Semenov-Tyan-Shansky; 2018:55-58. (In Russ.).
30. Beglova E.I., Nasyrova S.I. Education as a basis for human development. In: Current issues of economic theory: Development and application in the practice of Russian transformations. Proc. 4th All-Russ. sci.-pract. conf. (Ufa, May 26-27, 2015). Ufa: Ufa State Aviation Technical University; 2015:220-225. (In Russ.).
31. Butenko I.V., Butenko D.A. Priority areas for humanization of higher education in Russian higher education institutions. In: Humanization of education and upbringing in the education system: Theory and practice. Proc. 7th Int. sci. conf. (Prague, March 20-21, 2018). Prague: Vědecko Vydavatelské Centrum “Sociosféra-CZ”; 2018;48-52. (In Russ.).
32. Samarskaya N.A. Formation of a modern model of labor protection using the “black box” method. Sotsial’no-trudovye issledovaniya = Social & Labour Research. 2023;(1):108-116. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.34022/2658-3712-2022-50-1-108-116
33. Kirdina-Chandler S.G., Maevsky V.I. Methodological issues of the meso-level analysis in economics. Zhurnal institutsional’nykh issledovanii = Journal of Institutional Studies. 2017;9(3):7-23. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2017.9.3.007-023
Review
For citations:
Nasyrova S.I., Mierin L.A. Human-oriented economy: The research problem statement. Economics and Management. 2024;30(11):1323-1333. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2024-11-1323-1333
Views:
90
