Preview

Economics and Management

Advanced search

Modern problems of the state subsurface management system and possible solutions

https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2022-12-1200-1211

Abstract

   Aim. The presented study aims to investigate the existing models and problems of subsurface management regulation in Russia in the context of economic development priorities.
   Tasks. The authors describe subsurface as an object of state regulation and control; identify problems in subsurface management; define theoretical models of subsurface management; substantiate the need to reorganize the current Russian subsurface management model; provide recommendations for the formation of mechanisms to support economic entities that implement environmentally friendly subsurface management systems and digital technologies; justify the need for strategic subsurface management.
   Methods. This study uses general scientific research methods (analysis, synthesis, tabular method, grouping) and methods of strategic analysis.
   Results. Several problems in Russia’s existing state subsurface management system are considered and recommendations for overcoming them are given. It is established that the current licensing model of subsurface management needs to be enhanced by strengthening the contractual component (which includes creating a mixed model). The problem of developing an environmentally friendly subsurface management system is revealed and issues in the industry’s digital transformation are investigated.
   Conclusions. Nowadays, subsurface management is one of the key complex objects in the public administration system. It is based on an extensive system of legal relations between the government and subsurface users. The main problems in the field of subsurface management include imperfection of the current model of state regulation, incomplete formation of a system of environmentally friendly subsurface management, insufficient development of digital platforms and technologies within the industry, and lack of strategic management. These problems can be solved by implementing the following recommendations: developing mixed models of subsurface management (a combination of concession/contract and concession/license models); implementing the concept of circular economy in subsurface management; conducting an environmental modernization of the technologies used; making a transition towards digital management of the mineral resource base; enhancing the production of domestic geological and mining equipment; conducting a strategic exploration and strategic management of subsurface resources.

About the Authors

V. A. Plotnikov
St. Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics; St. Petersburg State University of Economics
Russian Federation

Vladimir A. Plotnikov, D.Sc. in Economics, Professor, Professor at the Department

Department of Management and State and Municipal Administration

190103

44A Lermontovskiy Ave.

Department of General Economic Theory and the History of Economic Thought

191023

21 Sadovaya str.

St. Petersburg



K. A. Shidlovskaya
Saint Petersburg Mining University
Russian Federation

Kseniya A. Shidlovskaya, PhD in Economics, assistant lecturer

Department of Economic Theory

199106

2, 21st Line, Vasilievskiy Island

St. Petersburg



References

1. Bodrunov S. D. The birth of a new era: Challenges for Russia and the world. Nauchnye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii = Scientific Works оf the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2022; 235 (3): 55-62. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.38197/2072-2060-2022-235-3-55-62

2. Plotnikov V. A., Vertakova Yu. V. Sustainable development of Russian industry in the context of a macroeconomic shock and new industrial policy. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management. 2022; 28 (10): 1037-1050. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.35854/1998-1627-2022-10-1037-1050

3. Smeshko O. G., Plotnikov V. A., Vertakova Yu. V. Prospects for the Russian economy: New challenges to economic security and public administration restructuring. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management. 2022; 28 (6): 524-537. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.35854/1998-1627-2022-6-524-537

4. Mereshkin D. E., Plotnikov V. A. State procedures for improving the investment climate in the Russian Federation: Prospects for improvement. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie = Administrative Consulting. 2021; (12): 70-80. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2021-12-70-80

5. Doroshenko S. N., Prima K. A., Lyashenko A. Ya. Stock market analysis on the example of Russian mining companied. Aktual’nye problemy ekonomiki i upravleniya = Actual Problems of Economics and Management. 2022; (1): 3-7. (In Russ.).

6. Pryima K. A. Evaluation of the real sector in the transition to the innovative development of the economic system. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki = Problems of Modern Economics. 2020; (1): 47-50. (In Russ.).

7. Priyma K. A. Sustainable innovation funding as a tool for developing the economic system. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management. 2020; 26 (2): 211-216. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.35854/1998-1627-2020-2-211-216

8. Vertakova Y., Plotnikov V., Babich T. Conceptual framework of state economic policy in the technological and social transformation conditions. E3S Web of Conferences. 2020; 164: 11016. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341155599_Conceptual_framework_of_state_economic_policy_in_the_technological_and_social_transformation_conditions

9. Khaikin M. M. The sphere of subsoil use in the context of the modern development of economic theory. Zapiski Gornogo instituta = Journal of Mining Institute. 2015; 213: 100-109. (In Russ.).

10. Ashby W. R. An introduction to cybernetics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1956. 320 p. (Russ. ed.: Ashby W. R. Vvedenie v kibernetiku. Moscow: URSS; 2019. 432 p.).

11. Rusetskaya G. D. Exploitation of natural resources in oil and gas industry: Common factors of use and conservation of ecological systems. Izvestiya Baikal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Baikal State University. 2019; 29 (4): 523-532. (In Russ.). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/nedropolzovanie-v-neftegazovom-komplekse-zakonomernosti-ispolzovaniya-i-sohraneniya-ekologicheskih-sistem

12. Zhernov E. E., Osokina N. V. Interdependence of types of rent as a factor of effective subsoil use in the territory. Ugol’. 2022; (1): 33-38. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18796/0041-5790-2022-1-33-38

13. Sergeev I. B. Organizational and economic models of subsoil use. Zapiski Gornogo instituta = Journal of Mining Institute. 2008; 179: 20-24. (In Russ.).

14. Miropol’skii D. Yu., ed. The influence of the characteristics of the real sector on the formation of opposite types of economic systems. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Economics; 2022. 353 p. (In Russ.).

15. Dyatlov S. A., Miropol’skii D. Yu., eds. State and market: Mechanisms of interaction in conditions of global instability of economic systems. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Economics; 2014. 706 p. (In Russ.).

16. Prolubnikov A. V. Institutional forms of harmonizing the interests of public and private entities of management. Teoriya i praktika servisa: ekonomika, sotsial’naya sfera, tekhnologii. 2015; (3): 42-48. (In Russ.).

17. Sigitova N. V. Economic and legal mechanism of production sharing agreements. Zapiski Gornogo instituta = Journal of Mining Institute. 2013; 205: 251-254. (In Russ.).

18. Golubkina T. M., Kretinin V. A. Directions for improving state regulation of mining in the Russian Federation. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship. 2021; (6): 85-87. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.34925/EIP.2021.131.6.014

19. Borkova E. A. Modeling socio-economic interrelations as a way to assess sustainable development of the region. Teoriya i praktika servisa: ekonomika, sotsial’naya sfera, tekhnologii. 2022; (3): 24-30. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1994-9960-2020-3-369-384

20. Kazantseva A. N. Issues of development and implementation of state policies in the sphere of production and applying environmentally pure products. Teoriya i praktika servisa: ekonomika, sotsial’naya sfera, tekhnologii. 2018; (2): 16-20. (In Russ.).

21. Cherenkov V. I., Tsoy E. V. Dilemma of the global diffusion of innovation and implementability of the total sustainable development. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2019; (5-1): 15-23. (In Russ.).

22. Ledovskikh V. A. Functions of state management of the economy in the field of subsoil use. Zapiski Gornogo instituta = Journal of Mining Institute. 2009; 182: 201-205. (In Russ.).

23. Lebedev Yu. V., Krylov V. G. System analysis of the subsurface sphere. Vestnik Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta geosistem i tekhnologii = Vestnik of the Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technologies (SSUGT). 2022; 27 (4): 160-168. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33764/2411-1759-2022-27-4-160-168

24. Mustafin S. K. Strategy for the integrated development of mineral raw materials in the old regions of subsoil use: Integration of research, optimization of management, environmental and economic aspect. Trudy Instituta geologii Dagestanskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN. 2011; (57): 155-159. (In Russ.).

25. Lebedev Yu. V., Valiev N. G. O., Lebzin M. S. Basis for sustainable development of the sphere of subsoil use and destructive factors. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo gornogo universiteta = News of the Ural State Mining University. 2021; (3): 149-155. (In Russ.). URL: https://iuggu.ru/download/2021/3-63-2021/018.pdf

26. Zhukov A. M. Formation of the organizational and economic mechanism of rational subsoil use. Zapiski Gornogo instituta = Journal of Mining Institute. 2009; 184: 34-38. (In Russ.).

27. Kuzevič S., Gergeľová M. B., Kuzevičová Ž., Mikhailov V. G. Regulation of economic relations of subsoil use in the system of ensuring sustainable development. Ekonomika i upravlenie innovatsiyami = Economics and Innovation Management. 2020;(3): 9-20. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26730/2587-5574-2020-3-9-20

28. Lebedeva T. A., Bragin M. A., Lyakhov S. V. Destructive factors of sustainable development of subsoil use. Interekspo Geo-Sibir’ = Interexpo GEO-Siberia. 2021; 4 (2): 113-118. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33764/2618-981X-2021-4-2-113-118

29. Il’yasov R. Kh. Flows in the digital economy: Analytical modeling with splines. In: Topical issues of modern science: Theory, technology, methodology and practice. Proc. Int. sci.-pract. online conf. Grozny: ALEF; 2021: 241-247. (In Russ.).

30. Vertakova Yu. V., ed. Institutional transformation of socio-economic systems in the context of digitalization: State, trends, problems and prospects. Kursk: Universitetskaya kniga; 2020. 294 p. (In Russ.).

31. Fedotova G. V. Problems of digitalization of the industrial sector. Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’ = National Interests: Priorities and Security. 2019; 15 (2): 273-283. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24891/ni.15.2.273

32. Polozhentseva Yu. S., Babich T. N. Conceptual aspects of management digital transformation socio-economic system. Russian Economic Bulletin. 2021; 4 (6): 203-208. (In Russ.).

33. Kuainz E. S. Economic model for the development of geological exploration work in subsoil use. Pervyi ekonomicheskii zhurnal. 2022; (7-2): 54-59. (In Russ.).

34. Fedchenko A. A. Impact of Russia’s accession to the World Trade Organization on the exploration industry. Zapiski Gornogo instituta = Journal of Mining Institute. 2014; 208: 70-74. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Plotnikov V.A., Shidlovskaya K.A. Modern problems of the state subsurface management system and possible solutions. Economics and Management. 2022;28(12):1200-1211. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2022-12-1200-1211

Views: 1161


ISSN 1998-1627 (Print)