Preview

Economics and Management

Advanced search

MTIC VAT Fraud in EU Countries and Measures to Counter Them

Abstract

The article examines the questions of VAT fraud in crossborder trade. Purpose. To analyze missing trader intra-community (MTIC) VAC fraud in Europe. Research tasks. To provide brief theoretical analysis of VAT in international trade; to examine current problems in the cross-border VAT fraud and main strategies to counter them; to estimate the MTIC VAT gap in EU countries in 2013-2014. Methodology. Comparative and graphical analysis Results. We found that among analyzed countries Italy had the largest MTIC VAT gap. It could be explained inter alia by the existing annual VAT returns (instead monthly and quarterly returns), which substantially complicates the process of quick detection of MTIC fraud. The significant increase of ratio of MTIC VAT gap to the VAT revenue was observed for the Czech Republic, which served as the main reason for fundamental changes in VAT reporting system in the country. Conclusion. The analysis of the theoretical background of VAT in cross-border trade in goods allowed us to determine both some main features related to the crossborder VAT fraud (organized crime, smuggling, money laundering and estimation problems) and measures to tackle them. We defined, based on the evaluation of current strategies aiming to reduce the possibilities of cross-border VAT fraud, the three main groups of such measures, notably, economic measures, institutional measures and procedural and technical measures.

About the Author

Elena V. Sokolovskaya
Research Institute of Fiscal Policy, State Fiscal Service of Ukraine
Russian Federation


References

1. Keen M., Smith S. VAT Fraud and Evasion: What Do We Know, and What Can be Done? Fiscal Affairs Department // IMF Working Paper, 2007. 35 р.

2. Fedeli S., Forte F. Models of Cross-Border VAT Fraud. Dipartimento di Economia Pubblica // Working Paper N 123. Roma, Giugno, 2009. 25 p.

3. Mesdom B. VAT and Cross-Border Trade: Do Border Adjustments Make VAT a Fair Tax? Tax Analysts. 2011. Р. 192-203.

4. Magnusson D. Investigating VAT fraud in connection with cross-border trade within the European Union. Jonkoping International Business School: [Электронный ресурс]. Режимдоступа: http://www.gma-bg.org/upl_doc/no%2009%20magnussson%20sofia%20ny%20eng%20ver.pdf.

5. Bukhsh F., Weigand H. VAT Fraud: Possible technical and ontological solutions. Tilburg University: [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://vmbo2015.blogs.dsv.su.se/files/2015/02/VMBO2015_submission_14.pdf.

6. Walpole M. Tackling VAT Fraud // International VAT Monitor. Sept./Oct. 2014. Р. 258-263.

7. Gradeva K. VAT Fraud in Intra-EU Trade. Goethe University. Frankfurt, 2014. 33 p.

8. International VAT/GST Guidelines. OECD, 2015. 81 p.

9. Sokolovska O. Race to the bottom in international tax competition:some conceptual issues // Journal of Tax Reform. 2016. Vol. 2, N. 2. Р. 98-110: [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://jtr.urfu.ru/fileadmin/user_upload/site_40_4525/Sokolovska.pdf.

10. Combating VAT fraud in the EU the way forward. International VAT association. European Commission, 2007. 49 p.

11. Frunza M. Cost of the MTIC VAT Fraud for European Union Members (April 4, 2016). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2758566.

12. Italy: Technical Assistance Report-Enhancing Governance and Effectiveness of the Fiscal Agencies. IMF Country Report. № 16/241, 2016. 69 p.

13. Fighting VAT fraud: “time to step up efforts”. ECA Press, 2016: [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/News/NEWS1603_03/INSR_VAT_FRAUD_EN. pdf.

14. Tackling intra-Community VAT fraud: More action needed. European Court of Auditors Special Report, 2016. N 24. 58 p.

15. Laundering the proceeds of VAT carousel fraud. FATF & OECD, 2007. 33 p.

16. EUROJUST News. Issue 11. March 2014. 20 p.


Review

For citations:


Sokolovskaya E.V. MTIC VAT Fraud in EU Countries and Measures to Counter Them. Economics and Management. 2016;(9):60-66. (In Russ.)

Views: 514


ISSN 1998-1627 (Print)