<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">emjume</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Экономика и управление</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Economics and Management</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1998-1627</issn><issn pub-type="epub">3033-7984</issn><publisher><publisher-name>СПбУТУиЭ</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.35854/1998-1627-2025-11-1386-1397</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">emjume-2669</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ ТЕОРИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ECONOMIC THEORY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Диалектика предпринимательской инновации: критический анализ модели PMAi и ее развитие через категорию Aufhebung</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The dialectics of entrepreneurial innovation: A critical analysis of the PMAi model and its development through the Aufhebung category</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3610-0081</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Смешко</surname><given-names>О. Г.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Smeshko</surname><given-names>O. G.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Олег Григорьевич Смешко, доктор экономических наук, доцент, ректор</p><p>190020, Санкт-Петербург, Лермонтовский пр., д. 44а</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Oleg G. Smeshko, D.Sc. in Economics, Associate Professor, rector</p><p>St. Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">rectorat@spbacu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Санкт-Петербургский университет технологий управления и экономики</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>St. Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>11</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>31</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1386</fpage><lpage>1397</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Смешко О.Г., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Смешко О.Г.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Smeshko O.G.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://emjume.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2669">https://emjume.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2669</self-uri><abstract><p>Цель. Расширение модели Progressive Materialization of Anti-Idea (PMAi) через интеграцию в ее структуру гегелевской категории Aufhebung.Задачи. Сформулировать расширенную версию PMAi как диалектическую последовательность фаз; операционализировать сохраняюще-трансформирующий эффект через введение коэффициентов деструкции (Kd) и Aufhebung (Ka); показать аналитическую применимость модели на эмпирических иллюстрациях и очертить «зоны поражения» инноваций.Методология. Методологической основой исследования послужил концептуально-теоретический анализ с элементами историко-понятийной реконструкции, с помощью которого проведено модельное расширение PMAi. Использованы также качественные сравнительные кейс-иллюстрации для проверки эвристики и картирования объекта разрушения (технологические цепочки, компетенции, регуляторика, инфраструктура).Результаты. Анализ модели PMAi показал, что ее достоинство заключается в способности формализовать разрушительный импульс предпринимательской инновации и задать четкий критерий новизны через понятие «анти-объекта». Модель успешно отражает ключевую интуицию шумпетеровской концепции creative destruction, превращая ее в инструмент для оценки масштабов и интенсивности вытеснения устаревших решений.Выводы. Выявлено методологическое ограничение, а именно редукция инновационного процесса к «чистой» деструкции, что существенно сужает объяснительный потенциал модели. Интеграция категории Aufhebung позволяет устранить этот недостаток, превратив PMAi в концепцию, способную описывать инновацию как диалектический процесс, в котором разрушение формы сочетается с сохранением и преобразованием существенных элементов содержания. В расширенном виде модель PMAi становится не просто теоретическим описанием феномена креативного разрушения, а полноценным инструментом стратегического анализа и прогнозирования инноваций.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Aim. The work aimed to expand the Progressive Materialization of Anti-Idea (PMAi) model by integrating Hegel’s category of Aufhebung into its structure.Objectives. The work seeks to formulate an expanded version of the PMAi as a dialectical sequence of phases; to operationalize the preserving-transforming effect by introducing the coefficients of destruction (Kd) and Aufhebung (Ka); to demonstrate the model analytical applicability through empirical illustrations and to outline the “damage zones” of innovation.Methods. The study methodological basis was a conceptual and theoretical analysis with elements of historical and conceptual reconstruction, which was used to expand the PMAi model. Qualitative comparative case exemplifications were also used to test the heuristics and map the object of destruction (technological chains, competencies, regulations, infrastructure).Results. Analysis of the PMAi model revealed its strength in its ability to formalize the destructive impulse of entrepreneurial innovation and define a clear criterion of novelty through the “anti-object” concept. The model represents successfully the key insights of Schumpeter’s concept of creative destruction, transforming it into a tool for assessing the scale and intensity of displacement of outdated solutions.Conclusions. A methodological limitation has been identified, namely the innovation process reduction to “pure” destruction, which significantly limits the explanatory potential of the model. The Aufhebung category integration enables to address this shortcoming, transforming PMAi into a concept capable of describing innovation as a dialectical process where the destruction of form is combined with the preservation and transformation of essential elements of content. In its expanded form, the PMAi model becomes not only a theoretical description of the creative destruction phenomenon, but a fully-fledged tool for strategic analysis and innovation forecasting.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>предпринимательская инновация</kwd><kwd>диалектика</kwd><kwd>креативное разрушение</kwd><kwd>Aufhebung</kwd><kwd>PMAi</kwd><kwd>экономическая трансформация</kwd><kwd>сохраняюще-трансформирующий эффект</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>entrepreneurial innovation</kwd><kwd>dialectics</kwd><kwd>creative destruction</kwd><kwd>Aufhebung</kwd><kwd>PMAi</kwd><kwd>economic transformation</kwd><kwd>preservation and transformation effect</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rothschild E. Economic sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet, and the Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001. 353 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rothschild E. Economic sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet, and the Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2001. 353 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schabas M. The natural origins of economics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2009. 208 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schabas M. The natural origins of economics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 2009. 208 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Litau E. Y. Concept of entrepreneurship anti-ideology // Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues. 2019. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 1308–1318. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.2(35)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Litau E.Y. Concept of entrepreneurship anti-ideology. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues. 2019;7(2):1308-1318. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.2(35)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гегель Г. В. Ф. Наука логики: в 3 т. Т. 1. Учение о бытии / пер. с нем. Б. Г. Столпнера. М.: Академический проект, 2021. 347 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hegel G.W.F. Wissenschaft der Logik. Bd.1. Nürnberg: Johann Leonhard Schrag; 1812. 384 p. (Russ. ed.: Hegel G.W.F. Nauka logiki. In 3 vols. Vol. 1. Uchenie o bytii. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt; 2021. 347 p.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change // Research Policy. 1982. Vol. 11. No. 3. P. 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy. 1982;11(3): 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McCloskey D. N. The rhetoric of economics // Journal of Economic Literature. 1983. Vol. 21. No. 2. P. 481–517.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McCloskey D.N. The rhetoric of economics. Journal of Economic Literature. 1983;21(2):481-517.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Herrmann-Pillath C., Boldyrev I. Hegel, institutions and economics: Performing the social. 1st ed. London; New York: Routledge, 2014. 236 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315848662</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Herrmann-Pillath C., Boldyrev I. Hegel, institutions and economics: Performing the social. 1st ed. London, New York: Routledge; 2014. 236 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315848662</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маркс К. К критике политической экономии. М.: Стереотип, 2024. 176 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marx K. Zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Berlin: W. Besser’s Verlagshandlung; 1859. 164 p. (Russ. ed.: Marx K. K kritike politicheskoi ekonomii. Moscow: Stereotip; 2024. 176 p.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шумпетер Й. А. Теория экономического развития. Капитализм, социализм и демократия / пер. с нем. и англ. М.: Эксмо, 2008. 864 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schumpeter J.A. Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker &amp; Humblot; 1911. 548 p.; Schumpeter J.A. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Routledge; 1976. 437 p. (Russ. ed.: Schumpeter J.A. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. Kapitalizm, sotsializm i demokratiya. Moscow: Eksmo; 2008. 864 p.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Weckowska D., Weiss D., Schwäbe C., Dreher C. Technological innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: A literature review // Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 2024. Vol. 54. Article 100935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2024.100935</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Weckowska D., Weiss D., Schwäbe C., Dreher C. Technological innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: A literature review. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 2024;54:100935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2024.100935</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Houlgate S. An introduction to Hegel: Freedom, truth and history. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005. 334 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Houlgate S. An introduction to Hegel: Freedom, truth and history. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2005. 334 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Troisi O., Visvizi A., Grimaldi M. Rethinking innovation through industry and society 5.0 paradigms: A multileveled approach for management and policy-making // European Journal of Innovation Management. 2024. Vol. 27. No. 9. P. 22–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-08-2023-0659</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Troisi O., Visvizi A., Grimaldi M. Rethinking innovation through industry and society 5.0 paradigms: A multileveled approach for management and policy-making. European Journal of Innovation Management. 2024;27(9):22-51. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-08-2023-0659</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
